Cohabitation and Marital Expectations Among Single Millennials in the U.S.
Cohabitation has surpassed marriage as the most common union experience in young adulthood. We capitalize on a new opportunity to examine both marital and cohabitation expectations among young single women in recently collected, nationally representative data (National Survey of Family Growth 2011–2015) (N = 1467). In the US there appears to be a ‘stalled’ second demographic transition as single young adult (ages 18–24) women have stronger expectations to marry than cohabit and the vast majority expects to, or has, already married. Among young women expecting to marry, the majority (68%) expect to cohabit with their future spouse but about one-third expect to follow a traditional relationship pathway into marriage (to marry without cohabiting first). In addition, women from disadvantaged backgrounds report the lowest expectations to marry, but there is no education gradient in expectations to cohabit. Marriage expectations follow a “diverging destinies” pattern, which stresses a growing educational divide, but this is not the case for cohabitation expectations. Our results, based on recently collected data, provide insight into the contemporary context of union formation decision-making for the millennial generation.
KeywordsCohabitation Marriage Young adulthood Second demographic transition Millennials Diverging destinies
This research was supported in part by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development center grants to the Center for Family and Demographic Research at Bowling Green State University (P2CHD050959) and the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan (P2CHD041028).
- Bogle, R. H., & Wu, H. S. (2010). Thirty years of change in marriage and union formation attitudes, 1976–2008 (FP-10-03). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. http://www2.bgsu.edu/downloads/cas/file119502.pdf.
- Carlson, E. (2018). Reformulating second demographic transition theory. In R. Schoen (Ed.), Analytic family demography (pp. 7–28). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cherlin, A. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Cherlin, A. (2014). Labor’s Love Lost: The rise and fall of the working class family in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
- Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegard, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239.Google Scholar
- Hemez, P. & Manning, W. D. (2017). Thirty years of change in premarital cohabitation experience (FP-17-05). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/hemez-manning-30-yrs-change-women-premarital-cohab-fp-17-05.html.
- Lamidi, E. (2015). Trends in cohabitation: The never married and previously married, 1995–2014 (FP-15-21). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. https://www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/lamidi-cohab-prev-and-never-married-fp-15-21.pdf.
- Lamidi, E. O., Manning, W. D., & Brown, S. L. (2019). Change in the stability of first premarital cohabitation, 1980–2009. Demography (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. A., & Stearns, J. (2016). Family inequality: Diverging patterns in marriage, cohabitation, and childbearing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 79–102.Google Scholar
- Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., Lamidi, E., & Payne, K. K. (2014c). Trends in births to single and cohabiting mothers, 1980–2009 (FP-14-05). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. http://www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/FP-14-05TrendsInBirth.pdf.
- Sassler, S. & Miller, A. (2017). Cohabitation Nation. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Scott, M. E., Schelar, E., Manlove, J., & Cui, C. (2009). Young adult attitudes about relationships and marriage: Times may have changed, but expectations remain high (Research Brief). Washington, DC: Child Trends. https://doi.org/10.1037/e508662011-001.
- Tanfer, K. (1987). Patterns of premarital cohabitation among never-married women in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49(3), 483–497.Google Scholar
- Taylor, P. (2010). The decline of marriage and rise of new families (Social and Demographic Trends report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://pewsocialtrends.org/files/2010/11/pewsocial-trends-2010-families.pdf.
- Tucker, M. B. (2000). Marital values and expectations in context: Results from a 21-city survey. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 283–2301). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). Table MS-2. Estimated median age at first marriage: 1890 to present. Suitland, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved June 28, 2018, from https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/tables/families/time-series/marital/ms2.xls.
- Willoughby, B. J., & Carroll, J. S. (2015). On the horizon: Marriage timing, beliefs, and consequences in emerging adulthood. In J. J. Arnett (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of emerging adulthood (pp. 280–295). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199795574.013.31.