Advertisement

Cohabitation and Contraceptive Use in the United States: A Focus on Race and Ethnicity

  • Maurice Anyawie
  • Wendy Manning
Original Research
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

While cohabitation has been increasing and a growing context to have and raise children, there has been little attention to one of the key determinants of fertility and effective contraceptive use. Drawing data from the 2013–2015 National Survey of Family Growth (N = 2285), we provide a contemporary portrait of contraceptive use among cohabiting American women. Specifically, we were guided by two main goals. First, we compared cohabiting and married women’s contraceptive use patterns and the variation by race and ethnicity. Second, we focused solely on cohabiting unions; and examined the racial and ethnic variation among cohabiting women. We found that cohabiting women are more likely to use effective methods of contraception than married women. Nonetheless, our findings point to the fact that white cohabiting women are driving the higher patterns of contraceptive use among cohabiting women. Indeed, a further examination of the variation among women in cohabiting relationships shows that black cohabitors are less likely to use effective contraception in cohabiting relationships, compared to whites. Our findings contribute to understanding the reproductive behaviors among a growing set of couples, cohabitors.

Keywords

Cohabitation Contraceptive use Race and ethnicity United States 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. This research was supported in part by the Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, which has core funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD050959). An earlier draft of this paper was presented at the 2018 Population Association of America and 2018 Council on Contemporary Families conferences.

References

  1. Bachrach, C. A. (1987). Cohabitation and reproductive behavior in the U.S. Demography, 24(4), 623–637.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S. L., Sanchez, L. A., Nock, S. L., & Wright, J. D. (2006). Links between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital quality, stability, and divorce: A comparison of covenant versus standard marriages. Social Science Research, 35(2), 454–470.Google Scholar
  3. Bumpass, L., & Lu, L. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54(1), 29–41.Google Scholar
  4. Chatters, L. M., Taylor, R. J., Bullard, K. M., & Jackson, J. S. (2009). Race and ethnic differences in religious involvement: African Americans, Caribbean blacks, and non-Hispanic whites. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(7), 1143–1163.Google Scholar
  5. Cherlin, A. J. (1998). Marriage and marital dissolutions among black Americans. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29(1), 147–158.Google Scholar
  6. Cherlin, A. J., Ribar, D. C., & Yasutake, S. (2016). Nonmarital first births, marriage, and income inequality. American Sociological Review, 81(4), 749–770.Google Scholar
  7. Choi, K. H., & Hamilton, E. (2016). Mexican migration to the United State and contraceptive use. Demographic Research, 34(40), 1129–1160.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. A. (2011). Children in Cohabiting Unions. (FP-11-07). National Center for Family & Marriage Research. Retrieved from http://ncfmr.bgsu.edu/pdf/familyprofiles/file101018.pdf.
  9. Culwell, K., & Feinglass, J. (2007). The association of health insurance with use of prescription contraceptives. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 226–230.Google Scholar
  10. Daniels, K., Daugherty, J., Jones, J., & Mosher, W. (2015). Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. National Health Statistics Report, 86, 1–4.Google Scholar
  11. Dehlendorf, C., Foster, D., de Bocanegra, H., Brindis, C., Bradsberry, M., et al. (2011). Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: Methods received by family PACT clients, California, 2011–2007. Perspective Sex Reproductive Health, 43(3), 181–187.Google Scholar
  12. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2011). Promises I can keep: How poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Eeckhaut, M. C. W., Sweeney, M. M., & Gipson, J. D. (2014). Who is using long-acting reversible contraceptive methods? Findings from nine low-fertility countries. Perspectives on Sexual Reproductive Health, 46(3), 149–155.Google Scholar
  14. England, P., Caudillo, M., Littlejohn, K., et al. (2016). Why do young, unmarried women who don’t want to get pregnant contracept inconsistently? Mixed-method evidence for the role of efficacy. Socius, 2, 1–15.Google Scholar
  15. Fehring, R. J., & Ohlendorf, J. (2007). The influence of religiosity on contraceptive use and abortion in the United States. Life and Learning, 17, 399–414.Google Scholar
  16. Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2011). Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception, 84(5), 478–485.Google Scholar
  17. Frost, J. J., Singh, S., & Finer, L. B. (2007). Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, united states, 2004. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(2), 90–99.Google Scholar
  18. Gibbs, L. (2014). Contraception biographies: women’s contraceptive method switching and union status. PhD dissertation; Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
  19. Gibson-Davis, C. M., & Rackin, H. (2014). Marriage or carriage? Trends in union context and birth type by education. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 506–519.Google Scholar
  20. Godecker, A. L., Thomson, E., & Bumpass, L. L. (2001). Union status, marital history and female contraceptive sterilization in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives, 33(1), 35–49.Google Scholar
  21. Guzzo, B. K. (2017b). Unintended births: variation across social and demographic characteristics. Family profiles. FP-17-09. Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family and Marriage Research. http://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/guzzo-unintended-births-variation-social-dem-char-fp-17-09.html.
  22. Hayford, S. R., & Guzzo, B. K. (2013). Race-ethnic differences in motivation to avoid unintended nonmarital pregnancy”. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45(1), 41–51.Google Scholar
  23. Hayford, S. R., Guzzo, B. K., & Smock, P. J. (2014). Decoupling of marriage and parenthood? Trends in the timing of marital first births, 1945–1995. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 520–538.Google Scholar
  24. Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86(3), 1163–1188.Google Scholar
  25. Hiekel, N., & Castro-Martín, T. (2014). Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 489–505.Google Scholar
  26. Hummer, R. A., & Hamilton, E. R. (2010). Race and ethnicity in fragile families. The Future of Children, 20(2), 113–131.Google Scholar
  27. Jacobs, J., & Stanfors, M. (2013). Racial and ethnic differences in U.S. women’s choice of reversible contraceptives, 1995–2010. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45(3), 139–147.Google Scholar
  28. Jones, R. K., Darroch, J. E., & Henshaw, S. K. (2002). Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000–2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(6), 294–303.Google Scholar
  29. Jones J., Mosher W.D., & Daniels K (2012). Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006 2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995. National health statistics reports; no 60. National Center for Health Statistics. 2012. Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr060.pdf.
  30. Kavanaugh, M. L., & Jerman, J. (2018). Contraceptive method use in the United States: Trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception, 97(1), 14–21.Google Scholar
  31. Kavanaugh, M. L., Jerman, J., & Finer, L. B. (2015). Changes in use of long acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. women, 2009–2012. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 126(5), 917–927.Google Scholar
  32. Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19(47), 1663–1692.Google Scholar
  33. Kiernan, K. E. (2001). The rise of cohabitation and childbearing outside marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 15(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  34. Kim, Y., & Raley, R. K. (2015). Race/ethnic differences in non-marital fertility rates in 2006–2010. Population Research and Policy Review, 34(1), 141–159.Google Scholar
  35. Kost, K., Singh, S., Vaughan, B., & Trussell, J. (2008). Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Contraception, 8(77), 10–21.Google Scholar
  36. Lichter, D. T. (2012). Childbearing among cohabiting women: Race, pregnancy, and union transitions. In Alan Booth, S. L. Brown, N. S. Landale, W. Manning, & S. M. McHale (Eds.), Early adulthood in a family context (pp. 209–219). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Lichter, D. T., Michelmore, K., Turner, R. N., & Sassler, S. (2016). Pathways to a stable union? Pregnancy and childbearing among cohabiting and married couples. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(3), 377–399.Google Scholar
  38. Lichter, D. T., & Qian, Z. (2008). Serial cohabitation and the marital life course. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(4), 861–878.Google Scholar
  39. Lichter, D. T., Sassler, S., & Turner, R. N. (2014). Cohabitation, post-conception unions, and the risein non-marital fertility. Social Science Research, 47(September), 134–147.Google Scholar
  40. Mahoney, A., Lamidi, E., Payne, K.K., & Manning, W. (2015). Religiosity and US single, cohabiting and married mothers. (FP-15-06). National Center for Marriage Research. http://w.w.w.bgsu.edu/resouces/data/fami-profiles/mahoney-lamidi-payne-fp-15-0/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/FP-14-05.
  41. Manning, W. D. (2001). Childbearing in cohabiting unions: racial and ethnic differences. Family Planning Perspectives, 33(5), 217–223.Google Scholar
  42. Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., Lamidi, E., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Trends in Births to Single and Cohabiting Mothers, 1980–2009. (FP-14-05). National Center for Family & Marriage Research. http://www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-ofarts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/FP-14-05TrendsInBirth.pdf
  43. Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Stykes, J. B. (2015). Family complexity among children in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654(1), 48–65.Google Scholar
  44. Manning, W., Flanigan, C., Giodano, C., & Longmore, M. (2009). Relationship dynamics and consistency of condom use among adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(3), 181.Google Scholar
  45. Manning, W. D., & Landale, N. S. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in the role of cohabitation in premarital childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 63–77.Google Scholar
  46. Manning, W. D., & Stykes, B. (2015). Twenty-five years of change in cohabitation in the US 1987-2013. (FP-15-01). National Center for Marriage Research. https://www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/…/FP/FP-15-01-twenty-five-yrs-cohab-us.pdf.
  47. Montgomery, M. R., & Casterline, J. B. (1996). Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Population and Development Review, 22(Supplement Fertility in the United States), 151–175.Google Scholar
  48. Moreau, C., Hall, K., Trussell, J., et al. (2013). Effect of prospectively measured pregnancy intentions on the consistency of contraceptive use among young women in Michigan. Human Reproduction, 28(3), 642–650.Google Scholar
  49. Musick, K., England, P., Edgington, S., & Kangas, N. (2009). Education differences in intended and unintended fertility. Social Forces, 88(2), 543–572.Google Scholar
  50. Musick, K., & Michelmore, K. (2015). Change in the stability of marital and cohabiting unions following the birth of a child. Demography, 52(5), 1463–1485.Google Scholar
  51. Osborne, C., Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2007). Married and cohabiting parents’ relationship stability: A focus on race and ethnicity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1345–1366.Google Scholar
  52. Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegârd, T., Keizer, R., & Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review, 36(4), 775–801.Google Scholar
  53. Prettner, K., & Strulik, H. (2017). It’s a sin—contraceptive use, religious beliefs, and long-run economic development. Review of Development Economics, 21(3), 543–566.Google Scholar
  54. Rajan, S., Morgan, S. P. P., Harris, M. K., et al. (2017). Trajectories of unintended fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 36(6), 903–928.Google Scholar
  55. Ranjit, N., Bankole, A., Darroch, J. E., & Singh, S. (2001). Contraceptive failure in the first two years of use: Differences across socioeconomic subgroups. Family Planning Perspectives, 33(1), 19–27.Google Scholar
  56. Reed, J., England, P., Littlejohn, K., Conroy Bass, B., & Caudillo, M. L. (2014). Consistent and inconsistent contraception among young women: Insights from qualitative interviews. Family Relations, 63(2), 244–258.Google Scholar
  57. Sassler, S., & Miller, A. J. (2014). ‘‘We are very careful’’: The fertility desires and contraceptive behaviors of cohabiting couples. Family Relations, 63(4), 538–553.Google Scholar
  58. Schieman, S. (2010). Socioeconomic status and beliefs about God’s influence in everyday life. Sociology of Religion, 71(1), 25–51.Google Scholar
  59. Schneider, D. (2011). Wealth and the marital divide. American Journal of Sociology, 117(2), 627–667.Google Scholar
  60. Schnieder, D. (2017). Non-marital and teen fertility and contraception during the Great Recession. The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(3), 126–144.Google Scholar
  61. Schwartz, C. R., & Han, H. (2014). The reversal of the gender gap in education and trends in marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 79(4), 605–629.Google Scholar
  62. Stykes, B. (2015). Generation X and millennials: attitudes about having and raising children in cohabiting unions (FP-15-13). National Center for Family & Marriage research. http://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/stykes-gen-x-millenials-fp-15-13
  63. Sweeney, M. M. (2010). The reproductive context of cohabitation in the United States: Recent change and variation in contraceptive use. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1155–1170.Google Scholar
  64. Sweeney, M. M. (2016). Socioeconomic standing and variability in marriage timing in the twentieth 20th century. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 663(1), 270–291.Google Scholar
  65. Sweeney, M., Castro-Martín, T., & Mills, M. (2015). The reproductive context of cohabitation in comparative perspective: Contraceptive use in the United States, Spain and France. Demographic Research, 32(5), 147–182.Google Scholar
  66. Sweeney, M., & Raley, R. K. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and the changing context of childbearing in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 539–558.Google Scholar
  67. Wu, L. L. (2008). Cohort estimates of nonmarital fertility. Demography, 45(1), 193–207.Google Scholar
  68. Wuthnow, R. (2003). Overcoming status distinctions? Religious involvement, social class, race and ethnicity in friendship patterns. Sociology of Religion, 64(4), 423–442.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Center for Family and Demographic ResearchBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations