Trajectories of Unintended Fertility
Having an unintended birth is strongly associated with the likelihood of having later unintended births. We use detailed longitudinal data from the Add Health Study (N = 8300) to investigate whether a host of measured sociodemographic, personality, and psychosocial characteristics select women into this “trajectory” of unintended childbearing. While some measured characteristics and aspects of the unfolding life course are related to unintended childbearing, explicitly modeling these effects does not greatly attenuate the association of an unintended birth with a subsequent one. Next, we statistically control for unmeasured time-invariant covariates that affect all birth intervals, and again find that the association of an unintended birth with subsequent ones remains strong. This persistent, strong association may be the direct result of experiencing an earlier unintended birth. We propose several mechanisms that might explain this strong association.
KeywordsUnintended fertility Selection Life course State dependence
- Barber, J. S., & A. Emens. (2006). The intersection among unintended, premarital and teenage childbearing in the U.S. Population Studies Center Research Report, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 06-608.Google Scholar
- Caspi, A., & Shiner, R. L. (2006). Personality development. Handbook of child psychology III:6Google Scholar
- Chandra, A., Martinez, G. M., Mosher, W. D., Abma, J. C., & Jones, J. (2005). Fertility, family planning, and the reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Statistics, 23(5), 1–160.Google Scholar
- Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises i can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Guilkey, D., & P. Lance. (2014). Program impact estimation with binary outcome variables: Monte Carlo results for alternative estimators and empirical examples. In Sickles & Horrace (Eds), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 5–46). Springer: New York.Google Scholar
- Harris, K. M. (2013) The Add Health study: design and accomplishments http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/data/guides/DesignPaperWIIV.pdf.
- Heckman, J. J. (1981). Heterogeneity and state dependence. In Studies in labor markets (pp. 91–140). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Heckman, J. J. (1991). Identifying the hand of past: Distinguishing state dependence from heterogeneity. The American Economic Review, 81(2), 75–79.Google Scholar
- Jones, R. K., & K. Kost (2006). Reporting of induced and spontaneous abortion in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Presented at the National Center for Health Statistics National Survey of Family Growth Research Conference, Bethesda, MD. October 19–20.Google Scholar
- Logan, C., E. Holcombe, J. Manlove, & S. Ryan (2007). The consequences of unintended childbearing. A White Paper prepared by Child Trends for the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
- Luker, K. (1985). Abortion and the politics of motherhood. Berkeley, CA., University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Mosher, W. D., J. Jones, & J. C. Abma (2012). Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982–2010. National Health Statistics Reports No. 55. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
- The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2003). National survey of adolescents and young adults: sexual health knowledge, attitudes, and experiences. Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. Proposed healthy people 2020 objectives, family planning. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/overview.aspx?topicid=13. Accessed 2/1/11.