Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 583–605 | Cite as

The Discrepancy Between Ideal and Actual Parity in Hong Kong: Fertility Desire, Intention, and Behavior

Article

Abstract

The total fertility rate of Hong Kong has remained below 1.3 children per woman for about three decades, but it is still unknown whether this ultra-low fertility is driven by a downward shift in people’s fertility desires, or by low fertility intention. This study investigates the fertility desires and fertility intentions of married women via a parity-specific approach, using data from the knowledge, attitude, and practice survey conducted in 2012. The results show that the average ideal parity has shifted to sub-replacement level, indicating that the “two-child family” ideal is waning. The logistic regressions show that the determinants of low fertility intentions vary across parities: marital life satisfaction, household income, and good communication with husbands regarding childbearing are positively associated with first-birth intentions; wives’ part-time work depresses second-birth intentions; wives’ full-time work and gender inequality in the division of housework are negatively associated with third-birth intentions. It is noteworthy that fertility desire has become a strong predictor of fertility intention—especially related to first and second births, independent of other socioeconomic factors. Motivations for childbearing and difficulties in childrearing also differ across actual parities. These results should be applicable to women in other high-income Asian countries. The formulation of any pronatalist policy in Hong Kong should consider these parity-specific differences to enhance its effectiveness.

Keywords

Fertility desire Fertility intention Parity-specific analysis Hong Kong 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the useful suggestions of the reviewers. This study was supported by the Strategic Public Policy Research Funding Scheme of Research Grant Council (SPPR-HKU-12). The data is made available by the Family Planning Association of Hong Kong and the authors are grateful for the support of the Research Committee of the Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Surveys.

References

  1. Adsera, A. (2011). Where are the babies? Labor market conditions and fertility in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 27(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atoh, M., Kandiah, V., & Ivanov, S. (2004). The second demographic transition in Asia? Comparative analysis of the low fertility situation in East and South-East Asian countries. The Japanese Journal of Population, 2(1), 42–75.Google Scholar
  4. Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: a review of research. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 29(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basten, S. (2013a). Comparing projection assumptions of fertility in six advanced asian economies; or ‘thinking beyond the medium variant’. Asian Population Studies, 9(3), 322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basten, S. (2013b). Re-Examining the fertility assumptions for Pacific Asia in the UN’s 2010 world population prospects. Oxford: University of Oxford Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Barnett Papers in Social Research.Google Scholar
  7. Basten, S. (2015). Understanding ultra-low fertility in Hong Kong. In R. R. Rindfuss & M. K. Choe (Eds.), Low and lower fertility (pp. 63–86). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basten, S., & Verropoulou, G. (2013). “Maternity migration” and the increased sex ratio at birth in Hong Kong SAR. Population Studies, 67(3), 323–334. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2013.826372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basten, S., & Verropoulou, G. (2015). A re-interpretation of the ‘Two-Child Norm’ in post-transitional demographic systems: Fertility intentions in Taiwan. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0135105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker, G. S. (2009). A Treatise on the Family. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bernardi, L., Mynarska, M., & Rossier, C. (2015). Uncertain, changing and situated fertility intentions. In D. Philipov, A. C. Liefbroer, & J. Klobas (Eds.), Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (pp. 113–139). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Berninger, I., Weiß, B., & Wagner, M. (2011). on the links between employment, partnership quality, and the intention to have a first child: the case of West Germany. Demographic Research, 24(24), 579–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Billari, F. C., Philipov, D., & Testa, M. R. (2009). Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: Explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 25(4), 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blossfeld, H.-P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M., & Kurz, K. (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society: The losers in a globalizing world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, 27, 260–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chan, S. (2014). Planning to have a baby in Hong Kong? That’ll cost you HK$5.5 m. Retrieved October 2015, from http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1583164/planning-baby-thatll-be-hk55m.
  17. Chen, Y.-H. (2008). The significance of cross-border marriage in a low fertility society: evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39(3), 331–352.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, F., Liu, G., & Mair, C. A. (2011). Intergenerational ties in context: Grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. Social Forces; A Scientific Medium Of Social Study And Interpretation, 90(2), 571.Google Scholar
  19. Chow, N., & Lum, T. (2008). Trends in family attitudes and values in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Central Policy Unit, Hong Kong SAR Government.Google Scholar
  20. Cooke, L. P. (2003). The south revisited: The division of labor and family outcomes in Italy and Spain. IRISS working paper series 2003–2012. Luxembourg: IRISS at CEPS/INSTEAD.Google Scholar
  21. Fiori, F., Rinesi, F., Pinnelli, A., & Prati, S. (2013). Economic insecurity and the fertility intentions of Italian women with one child. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(3), 373–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FPAHK. (2014). Report of youth sexuality study 2011. Available from Family Planning Association of Hong Kong Retrieved September 2016 http://www.famplan.org.hk/fpahk/en/template1.asp?style=template1.asp&content=info/research.asp.
  23. Frejka, T., Jones, G. W., & Sardon, J. P. (2010). East Asian childbearing patterns and policy developments. Population and Development Review, 36(3), 579–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00347.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fried, E. S., Hofferth, S. L., & Udry, J. R. (1980). Parity-specific and two-sex utility models of reproductive intentions. Demography, 17(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friedman, D., Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1994). A theory of the value of children. Demography, 31(3), 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagewen, K. J., & Morgan, S. P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review, 29(3), 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. HKCSD. (2010). Social data collected via the general household survey: Special topics report—report No.52. Available from Hong Kong census and statistics department. Retrieved January 2016 http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11301522010XXXXB0100.pdf.
  29. HKCSD. (2012). Demographic trends in Hong Kong 1981–2011. Available from Hong Kong census and statistics department Retrieved October 2015 http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B1120017032012XXXXB0100.pdf.
  30. HKCSD. (2015a). Hong Kong annual digest of statistics (2015 Edition). Available from Hong Kong census and statistics department Retrieved January 2016 http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B10100032015AN15B0100.pdf.
  31. HKCSD. (2015b). Hong Kong Population projections 2015–2064. Available from Hong Kong census and statistics department Retrieved September 2015 http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp190.jsp?productCode=B1120015.
  32. HKCSD. (2015c). Women and men in Hong Kong—key statistics (2015 Edition). Available from Hong Kong census and statistics department Retrieved January 2016 http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11303032015AN15B0100.pdf.
  33. Iacovou, M., & Tavares, L. P. (2011). Yearning, learning, and conceding: reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, G. W. (2007). Delayed marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia. Population and Development Review, 33(3), 453–478. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00180.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jones, G. W. (2012). Late marriage and low fertility in Singapore: the limits of policy. The Japanese Journal of Population, 10(1), 89–101.Google Scholar
  36. Kim, E. H.-W. (2013). Fertility Intentions and Behavior in a Lowest-Low Fertility Country. Paper presented at the XXVII IUSSP International Population Conference, Busan, South Korea.Google Scholar
  37. Kreyenfeld, M., & Andersson, G. (2014). Socioeconomic differences in the unemployment and fertility nexus: Evidence from Denmark and Germany. Advances in Life Course Research, 21, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leridon, H. (2004). Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Human Reproduction, 19(7), 1548–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Leridon, H. (2008). A new estimate of permanent sterility by age: sterility defined as the inability to conceive. Population Studies, 62(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: A life-course perspective. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 25(4), 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2014). Parental well-being surrounding first birth as a determinant of further parity progression. Demography, 52(4), 1147–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, 17(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McDonald, P. (2006). Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review, 32(3), 485–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McDonald, P. (2013). Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity. Demographic research, 28, 981–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mencarini, L., & Tanturri, M. L. (2004). Time use, family role-set and childbearing among Italian working women. Genus, 60(1), 111–137.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, W. B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: a theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120(2), 225–255.Google Scholar
  47. Miller, W. B. (2011a). Comparing the TPB and the TDIB framework. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, W. B. (2011b). Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mills, M., Mencarini, L., Tanturri, M. L., & Begall, K. (2008). Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and the Netherlands. Demographic Research, 18, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morgan, S. P., & Taylor, M. G. (2006). Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Namboodiri, N. K. (1972). Some observations on the economic framework for fertility analysis. Population Studies, 26(2), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oláh, L. S. (2003). Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(2), 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Philipov, D. (2009). Fertility intentions and outcomes: the role of policies to close the gap. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 25(4), 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Philipov, D. (2011). Theories on fertility intentions: a demographer’s perspective. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Philipov, D., & Bernardi, L. (2012). Concepts and operationalisation of reproductive decisions implementation in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Comparative Population Studies, 36(2–3), 495–530.Google Scholar
  56. Quah, S. R. (2015). Routledge Handbook of Families in Asia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Rijken, A. J., & Thomson, E. (2011). Partners’ relationship quality and childbearing. Social Science Research, 40(2), 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rotkirch, A., Basten, S., Väisänen, H., & Jokela, M. (2011). Baby longing and men’s reproductive motivation. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sobotka, T., & Beaujouan, É. (2014). Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Population and Development Review, 40(3), 391–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Spéder, Z., & Kapitány, B. (2009). How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 25(4), 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Straughan, P., Chan, A., & Jones, G. (2008). Ultra-low fertility in Pacific Asia: trends, causes and policy issues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Testa, M. R. (2012). Family sizes in Europe: Evidence from the 2011 Eurobarometer survey. Vienna: Vienna Inst. of Demography.Google Scholar
  63. Tong, Y., Piotrowski, M., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Resistant to change? The transition to parenthood among married adults in China. Journal of Family Therapy.Google Scholar
  64. Trent, R. B. (1980). Evidence bearing on the construct validity of” ideal family size”. Population and Environment, 3(3–4), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Udry, J. R. (1983). Do couples make fertility plans one birth at a time? Demography, 20(2), 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yeung, W.-J. J., & Hu, S. (2016). Paradox in marriage values and behavior in contemporary China. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 2(3), 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yip, P. S. F., Chen, M., & Chan, C. H. (2015). A tale of two cities: A decomposition of recent fertility changes in Shanghai and Hong Kong. Asian Population Studies, 11(3), 278–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yip, P., Law, C., & Cheung, K. (2008). Ultra-low fertility in Hong Kong: A review of related demographic transitions, social issues, and policies to encourage childbirth. In P. Straughan, A. Chan, & G. Jones (Eds.), Ultra-low fertility in Pacific Asia: Trends, causes and policy issues (pp. 132–159). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Yip, P., & Lee, J. (2002). The impact of the changing marital structure on fertility of Hong Kong SAR (Special Administrative Region). Social Science and Medicine, 55(12), 2159–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yip, P., Li, B. Y., Xie, K. S., & Lam, E. (2006). An analysis of the Lowest Total Fertility Rate in Hong Kong SAR. Paper presented at the International Conference on Declining Fertility in East and Southeast Asian Countries, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Work and Social AdministrationThe University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations