Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 441–466 | Cite as

The Future Labor Force of an Aging Taiwan: The Importance of Education and Female Labor Supply

Article

Abstract

This study uses multi-state cohort component projections and detailed vital statistics data to project the future Taiwanese population by age, sex, and education up to 2050. These are the first education-specific population projections for Taiwan, and they reveal how young highly educated cohorts during the next decades will replace older cohorts with lower levels of educational attainment. The results of the population projections enter our estimation of the future composition of the Taiwanese labor force. Incorporating education as an extra dimension in labor force projections allows us to make inferences about the quality of future labor supply in a rapidly aging Taiwan and the leverage of expanding economic activity across the life course, particularly of women. At present, women’s economic activity above age 25 in Taiwan is significantly lower than men’s and also much lower than women's in Western developed nations. Some of the expected adverse economic consequences of population aging can likely be alleviated by having a more educated and consequently more productive labor force. The overall results and conclusions of our study, though based on the Taiwanese context, apply to other Asian economies with rapidly aging populations and currently comparatively low levels of female labor force participation as well.

Keywords

Labor force projections Female labor force participation Education projections Population aging Taiwan 

References

  1. Ahn, N., & Mira, P. (2002). A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economics, 15(4), 667–682. doi:10.1007/s001480100078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billari, F., & Kohler, H.-P. (2004). Patterns of low and lowest-low fertility in Europe. Population Studies, 58, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., Fink, G., & Finlay, J. E. (2009). Fertility, female labor force participation, and the demographic dividend. Journal of Economic Growth, 14(2), 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, D., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, D. E., Chatterji, S., Kowal, P., Lloyd-Sherlock, P., McKee, M., Rechel, B., et al. (2015). Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. Lancet, 385, 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blossfeld, H.-P. (2009). Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 513–530. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Börsch-Supan, A. (2003). Labor market effects of population aging. Labour, 17(Special Issue), 5–44.Google Scholar
  8. Brewster, K. L., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2000). Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carone, G. (2005). Long-term labour force projections for the 25 EU member states: A set of data for assessing the economic impact of ageing (Vol. Economic Papers Nr. 235.). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.Google Scholar
  10. Chang, C.-F. (2006). The employment discontinuity of married women in Taiwan: Job status, ethnic background and motherhood. Current Sociology, 54(2), 209–228. doi:10.1177/0011392106056743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, C.-F. (2013). Sociology of labor. Taipei: Naitonal Cheng-Chi University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, C. (2005). Perspectives of Taiwan’s population and the potency of alternative policies. The Japanese Journal of Population, 3(1), 58–75.Google Scholar
  13. Cheng, Y.-H. A. (2014). Changing partner choice and marriage propensities by education in post-industrial Taiwan, 2000-2010. Demographic Research, 31(33), 1007–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chien, W.-Y. (2004). The changes of married women’s employment reentry in Taiwan (in Chinese). Journal of Population Studies, 28, 1–47.Google Scholar
  15. Council for Economic Planning and Development. (2010). Population projections of Taiwan from 2010 to 2060 (in Chinese) (pp. 1–70). Taipei: Council for Economic Planning and Development.Google Scholar
  16. Department of Household Registration. (2013). Population statistics database. Taipei: Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  17. DGBAS. (1987-2010). Yearbook of manpower survey statistics: 1987-2010. Taipei: Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan.Google Scholar
  18. DGBAS. (2015). Report on the manpower utilization survey. Taipei: DGBAS. Retrieved from http://ebook.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/512319493SQKUQ4S8.pdf.
  19. Fifield, A. (2014, August 1). Japanese leader Abe wants more women to work. So he’s got big plans for day care. Washington Post.Google Scholar
  20. Fougere, M., Harvey, S., Mercenier, J., & Merette, M. (2009). Population ageing, time allocation and human capital: A general equilibrium analysis for Canada. Economic Modelling, 26(1), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fukuda, S. (2013). The changing role of women’s earnings in marriage formation in Japan. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 646(1), 107–128. doi:10.1177/0002716212464472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gauthier, A. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(3), 323–346. doi:10.1007/s11113-007-9033-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for US women. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heard, G. (2011). Socioeconomic marriage differentials in Australia and New Zealand. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 125–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hseuh, C.-T. (2003). Demographic trends and traits in Taiwan: A few implications for social welfare policy (in Chinese). National Policy Quarterly, 2(4), 1–22.Google Scholar
  26. Jao, Y.-H., & Li, J.-C. A. (2012). Trends in the employment of married mothers of preschool-aged children in Taiwan. Chinese Sociological Review, 44(4), 5–26.Google Scholar
  27. Kashyap, R., Esteve, A., & García-Román, J. (2015). Potential (mis) match? Marriage markets amidst sociodemographic change in India, 2005–2050. Demography, 52(1), 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. KC, S., Barakat, B., Goujon, A., Skirbekk, V., Sanderson, W. C., & Lutz, W. (2010). Projection of populations by level of educational attainment, age, and sex for 120 countries for 2005-2050. Demographic Research, 22, 383–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Land, K. C., & Rogers, A. (1982). Multidimensional mathematical demography. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2010). Fertility, human capital, and economic growth over the demographic transition. European Journal of Population, 26, 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loichinger, E. (2015a). Labor force projections for India and China by age, sex, and highest level of educational attainment, 2010 to 2060. Paper presented at the 2013 IUSSP Meeting, Busan, South Korea.Google Scholar
  32. Loichinger, E. (2015b). Labor force projections up to 2053 for 26 EU countries, by age, sex, and highest level of educational attainment. Demographic Research, 32, 443–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ludwig, A., Schelkle, T., & Vogel, E. (2012). Demographic change, human capital and welfare. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15(1), 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lutz, W., Butz, W. P., & KC, S. (2014). World population and human capital in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lutz, W., Goujon, A., & Doblhammer-Reiter, G. (1998). Demographic dimensions in forecasting: Adding education to age and sex. Population and Development Review, 24, 42–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matysiak, A., & Vignoli, D. (2008). Fertility and women’s employment: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 24(4), 363–384. doi:10.1007/s10680-007-9146-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ministry of Education. (2012). Education statistics database. Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. Retrieved September 12, 2014, from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/.
  38. Ministry of Labor. (2013). International labor statistics. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Labor, Executive Yuan. Retrieved September 10, 2014, from http://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/nat/0228menu.htm.
  39. Ministry of the Interior. (1947–2015). Vital statistics database. Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior. Retrieved April 1, 2014, from http://www.ris.gov.tw/zh_TW/346.
  40. Ministry of the Interior. (1975–2013). Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of China, 1975-2013. In Department of Household Registration (Ed.). Taipei: Ministry of the Interior.Google Scholar
  41. Myrskylä, M., Goldstein, J. R., & Cheng, Y. H. A. (2013a). New cohort fertility forecasts for the developed world: Rises, falls, and reversals. Population and Development Review, 39(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Myrskylä, M., Leinonen, T., & Martikainen, P. (2013). Life expectancy by labor force status and social class: Recent period and cohort trends and projections for Finland, working papers 02/2013. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Pensions.Google Scholar
  43. National Development Council. (2014). Population projections of Taiwan from 2014 to 2061 (in Chinese) (pp. 1–75). Taipei: National Development Council.Google Scholar
  44. Nieuwenhuis, R., Need, A., & Van Der Kolk, H. (2012). Institutional and demographic explanations of women’s employment in 18 OECD countries, 1975–1999. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(3), 614–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD. (2016). OECD statistics database. Paris: OECD. Retrieved August 15, 2016, from http://stats.oecd.org/.
  46. Ogus, S., & Hedrick-Wong, Y. (2013). Women power and economic growth in Asia MasterCard Worldwide Insights (Vol. 3Q, 2013).Google Scholar
  47. Ono, H. (2003). Women’s economic standing, marriage timing, and cross-national contexts of gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 275–286. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00275.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pettit, B., & Hook, J. (2005). The structure of women’s employment in comparative perspective. Social Forces, 84(2), 779–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schrier, D. (2010). British Columbia labour force participation rate projections. A cohort analysis model. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Statistics.Google Scholar
  50. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42(4), 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tsay, C.-L. (2003). Below-replacement fertility and prospects for labour force growth in Taiwan. Journal of Population Research, 20(1), 67–87. doi:10.1007/BF03031796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Uunk, W., Kalmijn, M., & Muffels, R. (2005). The impact of young children on women’s labour supply a reassessment of institutional effects in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 48(1), 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang, H.-Z., & Chang, S.-M. (2002). The commodification of international marriages: Cross-border marriage business in Taiwan and Vietnam. International Migration, 40(6), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang, L., Lo, Y.-M., Fan, S.-C., & Chao, W.-T. (2009). Analysis of population projections for Taiwan: 2008 to 2056 Taiwan Economic Forum (Vol. 7, No. 8, pp. 36–69). Taipei: Department of Manpower Planning, Council for Economic Planning & Development, Executive Yuan.Google Scholar
  55. Yang, W.-S., & Lu, M. C.-W. (2010). Asian cross-border marriage migration: Demographic patterns and social issues (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yu, W.-H. (2009). Gendered trajectories: Women, work, and social change in Japan and Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Sociology, Academia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.College of Population StudiesChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)LaxenburgAustria

Personalised recommendations