Determinants of Mexican-Origin Dropout: The Roles of Mexican Latino/a Destinations and Immigrant Generation
Adolescents of Mexican origin have higher than average school dropout rates, but the risk of school non-enrollment among this subgroup varies substantially across geographic areas. This study conducts a multilevel logistic regression analysis of data from the 2005–2009 American Community Survey to evaluate whether spatial heterogeneity in school non-enrollment rates among Mexican-origin youth (n = 71,269) can be attributed to the histories of states and local areas as Mexican Latino/a receiving gateways. This study also determines whether the association between new destinations and school non-enrollment varies within the Mexican-origin population by nativity and duration of residence. Net of background controls, the risk of non-enrollment does not differ significantly between Mexican-origin youth living in states that are newer Mexican Latino/a gateways versus those in more established destinations, in part because Mexican-origin school non-enrollment rates are heterogeneous across newer destination states. At the more local Public Use Microdata Area level, however, Mexican-origin youth in newer gateways have a higher risk of non-enrollment than those in established destinations, revealing the importance of local-level contexts as venues for integration. The disparity in non-enrollment between Mexican-origin youth in new versus established destination PUMAs is apparent for all generational groups, but is widest among 1.25-generation adolescents who arrived in the country as teenagers, suggesting that local new destinations are particularly ill-equipped to deal with the educational needs of migrant newcomers.
KeywordsImmigration/migration Immigrant destinations Dropout Latinos/Hispanics
- Bean, F. D., & Tienda, M. (1988). Hispanic population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Bell, B. A., Morgan, G. B., Kromrey, J. D., & Ferron, J. M. (2010). The impact of small cluster size on multilevel models: A Monte Carlo examination of two-level models with binary and continuous predictors. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2010/Files/308112_60089.pdf.
- Fry, R. (2011). The Hispanic diaspora and the public schools: Educating Hispanics. In Latinos and the economy (pp. 15–36). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Gouveia, L., Carranza, M. A., & Cogua, J. (2005). The Great Plains migration: Mexicanos and Latinos in Nebraska. In V. Zúñiga & R. Hernández-León (Eds.), New destinations: Mexican immigration in the United States (pp. 23–49). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Hernández-León, R., & Zúñiga, V. (2005). Appalachia meets Aztlan: Mexican immigration and intergroup relations in Dalton, Georgia. In V. Zúñiga & R. Hernández-León (Eds.), New destinations: Mexican immigration in the United States (pp. 244–274). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. J., Cullen, R. M., & Boswell, T. D. (1980). The changing demography of Spanish Americans. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Massey, D. S. (2008). New faces in new places: The changing geography of american immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Massey, D. S., & Capoferro, C. (2008). The geographic diversification of American immigration. In D. S. Massey (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of american immigration (pp. 25–50). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The condition of education—Elementary and secondary education—Student effort, persistence and progress—Status dropout rates—Indicator May (2016). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_coj.asp.
- Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Ruggles, S. J., Alexander, J. T., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Schroeder, M. B., & Sobek, M. (2010). Integrated public use microdata series: Version 5.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Rumberger, R., & Lim, S. A. (2008). Why students drop out of school: A review of 25 years of research. Santa Barbara, CA: California Dropout Research Project. Retrieved from http://inpathways.net/researchreport15.pdf.
- Schneider, B., Martinez, S., & Owens, A. (2006). Barriers to educational opportunities for Hispanics in the United States. In M. Tienda & F. Mitchell (Eds.), Hispanics and the future of America (pp. 179–227). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, A. (2004). The rise of new immigrant gateways. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2004/02/demographics-singer.
- Singer, A. (2014). Metropolitan immigrant gateways revisited, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2015/12/01-metropolitan-immigrant-gateways-revisited-singer.
- Telles, E. M., & Ortiz, V. (2008). Generations of exclusion: Mexican-Americans, assimilation, and race. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Terrazas, A. (2011). Immigrants in new-destination states. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/immigrants-new-destination-states.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). Employment status of the civilian noninstitutional population by sex, race, Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, marital status, and detailed age, 2005 annual averages [table]. Geographic profile of employment and unemployment. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/gps/#tables.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Percent of the total population 25 years and over with a Bachelor’s degree or higher by sex, for the United States, regions, and states: 1940 to 2000 [table]. Census 2000 PHC-T-41. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/education/data/census/halfcentury/tables.html.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Public use microdata areas (PUMAs). Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/puma.html.
- Zúñiga, V., & Hernández-León, R. (2005). New destinations: Mexican immigration in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar