Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 287–305 | Cite as

Cohabitation Expectations Among Young Adults in the United States: Do They Match Behavior?

  • Wendy D. Manning
  • Pamela J. Smock
  • Cassandra Dorius
  • Elizabeth Cooksey
Article

Abstract

Cohabitation continues to rise, but there is a lack of knowledge about expectations to cohabit and the linkage between expectations and subsequent cohabitation. We capitalize on a new opportunity to study cohabitation expectations by drawing on the National Longitudinal Study of Youth (NLSY79) main youth and two waves (2008 and 2010) of the NLSY young adult (YA) surveys (n = 1,105). We find considerable variation in cohabitation expectations: 39.9 % have no expectation of cohabiting in the future and 16.6 % report high odds of cohabiting in the next 2 years. Cohabitation expectations are associated with higher odds of entering a cohabiting relationship, but are not perfectly associated. Only 38 % of YAs with certain cohabitation expectations in 2008 entered a cohabiting union by 2010. Further investigation of the mismatch between expectations and behaviors indicates that a substantial minority (30 %) who entered a cohabiting union had previously reported no or low expectations, instances of what we term “unplanned cohabitation.” Our findings underscore the importance of considering not only just behavior but also individuals’ expectations for understanding union formation, and more broadly, family change.

Keywords

Family Cohabitation Union formation Emerging adulthood Young adults Unplanned cohabitation 

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Koblas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Axinn, W. G., & Thornton, A. (1993). Mothers, children, and cohabitation: The intergenerational effects of attitudes and behavior. American Sociological Review, 58(2), 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, J. S. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Considering drives, proximity and dynamics. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogle, R. H., & Wu, H. S. (2010). Thirty years of change in marriage and union formation attitudes, 1976–2008 (Family Profile-10-03). Bowling Green: National Center for Family and Marriage Research.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S. L. (2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulcroft, R. A., & Bulcroft, K. A. (1993). Race differences in attitudinal and motivational factors in the decision to marry. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(2), 338–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bumpass, L. (1990). What’s happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27(4), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlson, M., McLanahan, S., & England, P. (2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41(2), 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J., & Manning, W. (2010). The relationship context of premarital serial cohabitaiton. Social Science Research, 39(5), 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Copen, C., Daniels, K., & Mosher, W. (2013). First premarital cohabitation in the United States: 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National Health Statistics Reports, 64. Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
  12. Crissey, S. R. (2005). Race/ethnic differences in the marital expectations of adolescents: The role of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 697–709.Google Scholar
  13. DeMaris, A. (2004). Regression with social data: Modeling continuous and limited response variables (vol. 417). Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Eggebeen, D., & Dew, J. (2009). The role of religion in adolescence for family formation in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(1), 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Freedman, R., Coombs, L. C., & Bumpass, L. L. (1965). Stability and change in expectations about family size. Demography, 2, 250–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1301–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guzzo, K. B. (2006a). The relationship between life course events and union formation. Social Science Research, 35(2), 384–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guzzo, K. B. (2006b). How do marriage market conditions affect entrance into cohabitation vs. marriage? Social Science Research, 35(2), 332–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guzzo, K. B. (2009). Marital intentions and the stability of first cohabitations. Journal of Family Issues, 30(2), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagewen, K. J., & Morgan, S. P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Halpern-Meekin, S. (2012). Unlikely optimists, skeptics, and believers: Understanding adolescents’ prospective relationship views. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27(5), 606–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayford, S. R. (2009). The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography, 46(4), 765–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang, P. M., Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Bergstrom-Lynch, C. (2011). He says, she says: Gender and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 32(7), 876–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2011). Cohabitation and trends in the structure and stability of children’s family lives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Kiser, C. V. (1967). The growth of American families studies: An assessment of significance. Demography, 4(1), 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landale, N. S., Schoen, R., & Daniels, K. (2010). Early family formation among White, Black, and Mexican American women. Journal of Family Issues, 31(4), 445–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lehrer, E. (2004). The role of religion in union formation: An economic perspective. Population Research and Policy Review, 23(2), 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lesthaeghe, R., & Neidert, L. (2006). The second demographic transition in the United State: Exception or textbook example? Population and Development Review, 32(4), 669–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Licther, L., Batson, C., & Brown, J. (2004). Marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single and cohabiting mothers. Social Service Review, 78(1), 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liefbroer, A. (2011). On the usefulness of the theory of planned behaviour for fertility research. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liefbroer, A., Gerritsen, L., & Gireveld, J. (1994). The influence of intentions and life course factors on union formation behavior of young adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56(1), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Manning, W. D. (2013). Trends in cohabitation: Twenty years of change, 1987–2008 (Family Profile-13-12). Bowling Green: National Center for Family and Marriage Research.Google Scholar
  35. Manning, W. D., Cohen, J. A., & Smock, P. J. (2011). The role of romantic partners, family, and peer networks in dating couples’ views about cohabitation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 26(1), 115–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2007). The changing institution of marriage: Adolescents’ expectations to cohabit and to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 559–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manning, W. D., & Smock, P. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 989–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manning, W. D., Trella, D., Lyons, H., & Du Toit, N. C. (2010). Marriageable women: A focus on participants in a community healthy marriage program. Family Relations, 59(1), 87–102.Google Scholar
  39. McLanahan, S. S., & Sandefur, G. D. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, W. B., & Pasta, D. (1995). Behavioral intentions: Which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(6), 530–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morgan, S. P., & Bachrach, C. (2011). Is the theory of planned behavior an important model for human fertility? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morgan, S. P., & Rackin, H. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 36(1), 91–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oppenheimer, V. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career development process. Demography, 40(1), 127–149.Google Scholar
  44. Pearce, L. D., & Thornton, A. (2007). Religious identity and family ideologies in the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1227–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Philipov, D. (2011). Theories on fertility intentions: A demographer’s perspective. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raley, R., Crissey, S., & Muller, C. (2007). Of sex and romance: Late adolescent relationships and young adult union formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(5), 1210–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rindfuss, R. R. (1991). The young adult years: Diversity, structural change, and fertility. Demography, 28(4), 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryan, S., Franzetta, K., Schelar, E., & Manlove, J. (2009). Family structure history: Links to relationship formation behaviors in young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(4), 935–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sassler, S., Cunningham, A., & Lichter, D. T. (2009). Intergenerational patterns of union formation and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30(6), 757–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sassler, S., & Schoen, R. (1999). The effect of attitudes and economic activity on marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Kim, Y. J., Nathanson, C. A., & Fields, J. M. (1999). Do fertility intentions affect behavior? Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(3), 790–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schoen, R., Landale, N., & Daniels, K. (2007). Family transitions in young adulthood. Demography, 44(4), 807–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scott, M. E., Schelar, E., Manlove, J., & Cui, C. (2009). Young adult attitudes about relationships and marriage: Times may have changed, but expectations remain high. (Research Brief). Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  54. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smock, P. J., & Greenland, F. (2010). Diversity in pathways to parenthood: Patterns, implications, and emerging research directions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 576–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smock, P. J., & Manning, W. D. (1997). Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage. Demography, 34(3), 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. South, S. J. (1993). Racial and ethnic differences in the desire to marry. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(2), 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stewart, S., Manning, W., & Smock, P. (2003). Union formation among men in the U.S.: Does having prior children matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thornton, A., Axinn, W., & Teachman, J. (1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60(5), 762–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1009–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. U.S. Bureau of the Census (2011) Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to the present. In Families and Living Arrangements: Marital Status. Retrieved August 31, 2012 from http://www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/marital.html.
  62. Waller, M. R., & McLanahan, S. S. (2005). “His” and “her” marriage expectations: Determinants and consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whelpton, P. K., Campbell, A. A., & Patterson, J. E. (1966). Fertility and family planning in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Zito, R. C. (2013). Family structure history and teenage cohabitation: Instability, socioeconomic disadvantage or transmission? Journal of Family Issues,. doi:10.1177/0192513X13490933.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy D. Manning
    • 1
  • Pamela J. Smock
    • 2
  • Cassandra Dorius
    • 3
  • Elizabeth Cooksey
    • 4
  1. 1.Sociology Department and Center for Family and Demographic ResearchBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Sociology Department and Population Studies CenterThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  4. 4.Department of SociologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations