Advertisement

Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 687–716 | Cite as

Declining Segregation of Same-Sex Partners: Evidence from Census 2000 and 2010

  • Amy L. Spring
Article

Abstract

Despite recent media and scholarly attention describing the “disappearance” of traditionally gay neighborhoods, urban scholars have yet to quantify the segregation of same-sex partners and determine whether declining segregation from different-sex partners is a wide-spread trend. Focusing on the 100 most populous places in the United States, I use data from the 2000 and 2010 Decennial Census to examine the segregation of same-sex partners over time and its place-level correlates. I estimate linear regression models to examine the role of four place characteristics in particular: average levels of education, aggregate trends in the family life cycle of same-sex partners, violence and social hostility motivated by sexual orientation bias, and representation of same-sex partners in the overall population. On average, same-sex partners were less segregated from different-sex partners in 2010 than in 2000, and the vast majority of same-sex partners lived in environments of declining segregation. Segregation was lower and declined more rapidly in places that had a greater percentage of graduate degree holders. In addition, segregation of female partners was lower in places that had a greater share of female partner households with children. These findings suggest that sexual orientation should be considered alongside economic status, race, and ethnicity as an important factor that contributes to neighborhood differentiation and urban spatial inequality.

Keywords

Residential segregation Same-sex partners Gay and lesbian population Sexual orientation Neighborhoods 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges Stewart Tolnay and four anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Partial support for this research came from a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development training grant, T32 HD007543, to the Center for Studies in Demography & Ecology at the University of Washington.

References

  1. Adler, S., & Brenner, J. (1992). Gender and space: Lesbians and gay men in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 16(1), 24–34.Google Scholar
  2. Advocate. (2007). The Advocate Poll, p. 10. Accessed 24 April 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, A. M., & Hammarstedt, M. (2009). Detecting discrimination against homosexuals: Evidence from a field experiment on the internet. Economica, 76(303), 588–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Anacker, K. B., & Morrow-Jones, H. A. (2005). Neighborhood factors associated with same-sex households in US cities. Urban Geography, 26(5), 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badgett, M. V. L. (1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(4), 726–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badgett, M. V. L., & Rogers, M. A. (2003). Left out of the count: Missing same-sex couples in Census 2000. Institute for Gay and Lesbian Strategic Studies. Available via http://ourfamiliescount.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/LeftOut.pdf. Cited 31 Aug 2012.
  8. Barth, J., Overby, L. M., & Huffmon, S. H. (2009). Community context, personal contact, and support for an anti-gay rights referendum. Political Research Quarterly, 62(2), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bell, D., & Valentine, G. (1995). Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography, 37(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2002). Why do gay men live in San Francisco? Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1), 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Black, D., Makar, H., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2003). The earning effects of sexual orientation. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 56(3), 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Bouthillette, A.-M. (1997). Queer and gendered housing: A tale of two neighborhoods in Vancouver. In G. B. Ingram, A.-M. Bouthillette, & Y. Retter (Eds.), Queers in space: Communities, public places, and sites of resistance (pp. 213–232). Seattle, WA: Bay Press.Google Scholar
  15. Buchanan, W. (2007). S.F.’s Castro District faces an identity crisis. San Francisco Chronicle. Available via http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/S-F-s-Castro-district-faces-an-identity-crisis-2615423.php. Accessed 25 Feb 2007.
  16. Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movement. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Christafore, D., & Leguizamon, S. (2012). The influence of gay and lesbian coupled households on house prices in conservative and liberal neighborhoods. Journal of Urban Economics, 72(2), 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooke, T. J., & Rapino, M. (2007). The migration of partnered gays and lesbians between 1995 and 2000. The Professional Geographer, 59(3), 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation measures. American Sociological Review, 20(2), 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Escoffier, J. (1975). Stigmas, work environment, and economic discrimination against homosexuals. Homosexual Counseling Journal, 2(1), 8–17.Google Scholar
  22. Farley, R., Steeh, C., Krysan, M., Jackson, T., & Reeves, K. (1994). Stereotypes and segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit area. American Journal of Sociology, 100(3), 750–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Florida, R. L. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Florida, R., & Gates, G. (2001). Technology and tolerance: The importance of diversity to high-technology growth. The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. Available via http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/1000492_tech_and_tolerance.pdf. Cited 31 Aug 2012.
  25. Florida, R., & Mellander, C. (2010). There goes the metro: How and why bohemians, artists and gays affect regional housing values. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forsyth, A. (1997). ‘Out’ in the valley. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21(1), 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gates, G. J. (2010). Same-sex couples in US Census Bureau data: Who gets counted and why. The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. Available via http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/same-sex-couples-in-us-census-bureau-data-who-gets-counted-and-why/. Cited 31 Aug 2012.
  28. Gates, G. J., & Cooke, A. M. (2012). Census 2010 snapshots. The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. Available via http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/census-lgbt-demographics-studies/us-census-snapshot-2010/. Cited 31 Aug 2012.
  29. Gates, G. J., & Ost, J. (2004). The gay and lesbian atlas. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  30. GeoLytics, Inc. (2010). Census of population and housing 2010, summary file 1 in 2000 boundaries. East Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  31. Ghaziani, A. (2010). There goes the gayborhood? Contexts, 9(4), 64–66.Google Scholar
  32. Ghaziani, A. (2011). Post-gay collective identity construction. Social Problems, 58(1), 99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Green, D. P., McFalls, L. H., & Smith, J. K. (2001). Hate crime: An emergent research agenda. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 479–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Green, D. P., Strolovitch, D. Z., & Wong, J. S. (1998). Defended neighborhoods, integration, and racially motivated crime. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 372–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayslett, K. L., & Kane, M. D. (2011). “Out” in Columbus: A geospatial analysis of the neighborhood-level distribution of gay and lesbian households. City & Community, 10(2), 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(4), 412–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, R., & Farley, R. (1985). On the statistical significance of the index of dissimilarity. Paper presented at the 1985 Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  38. Kirkey, K., & Forsyth, A. (2001). Men in the valley: Gay male life on the suburban-rural fringe. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kyles, K. (2007). Culture clash: Boystown shifting as more families move in. Chicago Tribune. Available via http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2007-12-10/news/0712100253_1_gay-men-calendars-culture-clash. Accessed 10 Dec 2007.
  40. Laumann, E., Ellingson, S., Mahay, J., Paik, A., & Youm, Y. (2004). The sexual organization of the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lauster, N., & Easterbrook, A. (2011). No room for new families? A field experiment measuring rental discrimination against same-sex couples and single parents. Social Problems, 58(3), 389–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J., & Farley, R. (2004). Segregation of minorities in the metropolis: Two decades of change. Demography, 41(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.Google Scholar
  44. Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. O’Connell, M., & Feliz, S. (2011). Same-sex couple household statistics from the 2010 Census. Social, Economic and Housing Statistics Division working paper number 2011-26, US Bureau of the Census. Available via http://www.census.gov/hhes/samesex/files/ss-report.doc. Cited 31 Aug 2012.
  46. Patterson, O. (1997). The ordeal of integration: Progress and resentment in America’s “racial” crisis. Washington, DC: Civitas/Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2007). The age of independence: Interracial unions, same-sex unions, and the changing American family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rossi, P. H. (1980). Why families move. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Rushbrook, D. (2002). Cities, queer space, and the cosmopolitan tourist. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 8(1–2), 183–206.Google Scholar
  50. Seidman, S. (2002). Beyond the closet: The transformation of gay and lesbian life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Skogan, W. (1986). Fear of crime and neighborhood change. Crime and Justice, 8, 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thernstrom, S., & Thernstrom, A. (1997). America in black and white: One nation, indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  53. US Census Bureau. (2000). Census of population and housing, 2000: Summary tape file 1. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  54. US Census Bureau. (2009). American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, 2005–2009. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  55. US Census Bureau. (2010). Census of population and housing, 2010: Summary tape file 1. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  56. US Department of Justice & Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2005–2010). Hate Crime Statistics, 2005–2010. Available via http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ucr#cius_hatecrime. Cited 23 Jan 2013.
  57. Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zoloth, B. S. (1976). Alternative measures of school segregation. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations