Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 339–360 | Cite as

Schools, Neighborhoods and Selection: Outcomes Across Metropolitan Los Angeles

  • William A. V. ClarkEmail author
  • Regan Maas


What is the relationship between school segregation and neighborhood segregation across school districts in Los Angeles County, and are school district outcomes on reading and mathematics scores related to levels of school segregation across these districts? We compute segregation scores using US tract level data for 2000 and use reading and mathematics scores from California State tests. Data from the Los Angeles family and neighborhood survey are used to track individual residential changes and differences in the associated Woodcock Johnson scores. We show that there is a close link between levels of school segregation and neighborhood segregation and that many suburban school districts are relatively integrated across both neighborhoods and schools. When we examine average school district outcomes on reading and mathematics scores we do not find any relationship with levels of segregation. At the same time there is clear evidence of spatial sorting with poorer and lower scoring children moving into school districts (or zones with poorer achieving schools). The multi-level models of segregation and achievement show that the variance in achievement levels across districts is significantly greater than across schools within districts.


Segregation Schools Neighborhoods Selectivity 


  1. Andersson, Eva., Östh, John., & Malmberg, B. (2010). Ethnic segregation and performance inequality in the Swedish school system: A regional perspective. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2674–2686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armor, D. (1995). Forced justice: School desegregation and the law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Black, D. (2008). The uncertain future of school desegregation and the importance of goodwill, good sense and a misguided decision. Catholic University Law Review, 57, 947–990.Google Scholar
  4. Brannstrom, L. (2008). Making their mark: The effects of neighborhood and upper secondary school on educational achievement. European Sociological Review, 24, 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, W. A. V. (1987). School desegregation and white flight: A re-examination and case study. Social Science Research, 16, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, W. A. V. (1988). Does school desegregation policy stimulate residential integration: Evidence from a case study. Urban Education, 23, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, W. A. V. (2002) School desegregation and demographic change. In C. Rossell, D. Armor, & H. Walberg (Eds.), School desegregation in the 21st Century (pp. 119–145). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, W. A. V., & Ledwith, V. (2007). How much does income matter in neighborhood choice? Population Research and Policy Review, 26, 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clotfelter, C. T. (1999). Public school segregation in metropolitan areas. Land Economics, 75, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clotfelter, C. T. (2001). Are whites still ‘fleeing’? Racial patterns and enrollment shifts in urban public schools, 1987–1996. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E., Mood, A., Hobson, C., McPartland, J., Weinfeld, F., & York, R. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  12. Fairlie, R. W., & Resch, A. M. (2002). Is there “White flight” into private schools? Evidence from the national educational longitudinal survey. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finney, N., & Simpson, L. (2009). Sleepwalking into segregation: Challenging the myths about race and migration. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Frankenburg, E., Lee, C., & Orfield, G. (2003). A multiracial society with segregated schools: Are we losing the dream? Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman v Pitts (1992). 118 l. Ed 2nd 108.Google Scholar
  16. Hamnett, C., Ramsden, M., & Butler, T. (2007). Social background, ethnicity, school composition and educational attainment in East London. Urban Studies, 44, 1255–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, R., & Johnston, R. (2008). Primary schools, markets and choice: Studying polarization and the core catchment areas of schools. Applied Spatial Analysis, 1, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris, R., Johnston, R. J., & Burgess, S. M. (2007). Neighborhoods, ethnicity and school choice: Developing a statistical framework for geodemographic analysis. Population Research and Policy Review, 26, 553–579.Google Scholar
  19. Johnston, R. J., Wilson, D., & Burgess, S. (2004). School segregation in multiethnic England. Ethnicities, 4(2), 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ledwith, V. (2009). Open enrolment and student sorting in public schools: Evidence from Los Angeles County. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ledwith, V., & Clark, W. A. V. (2008). The effect of the residential mosaic and white flight on public school composition: Evidence from Los Angeles County. Urban Geography, 28, 1–20.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, V., & Burkam, D. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Los Angeles family and neighborhood survey. (2001). Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Retrieved from
  24. Nechyba, T. (2003). School finance, spatial income segregation, and the nature of communities. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, E. (2009). Examining the costs of diversity. University of Miami Law Review, 63, 577–603.Google Scholar
  26. Oberti, M. (2007). Social and school differentiation in urban space: Inequalities and local configurations. Environment and Planning A, 39, 208–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orfield, G. (1978). Must we bus?. Washington, DC: Brookings Foundation.Google Scholar
  28. Orfield, G., & Monfort, F. (1992). The status of school desegregation: The next generation. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Assn.Google Scholar
  29. Parents v Seattle School District No. 1. (2007). 551U.S. 701, 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Reynolds, A., Chen C., & Herbers, J. (2009). School mobility and educational success: A research synthesis and evidence on prevention. Paper at the Workshop on the Impact of Mobility and Change on the lives of Young Children. National Research Council, June 2009, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Rossell, C. (1990). The carrot of the stick for school desegregation policy. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 25, 474–499.Google Scholar
  32. Rossell, C. (1995). Controlled choice desegregation plans: Not enough choice and too much control. Urban Affairs Review, 31, 43–76.Google Scholar
  33. Rossell, C., Armor, D., & Walberg H. (2002). School desegregation in the 21st century (pp. 119–145). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  34. Saporito, S. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50(2), 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saporito, S., & Sohoni, D. (2006). Coloring outside the lines: Racial segregation in public schools and their attendance boundaries. Sociology of Education, 79, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shaw, T. (2007). In landmark ruling supreme court strikes down voluntary desegregation in public schools, June 29, 2007 (
  37. Sibieta, L., Chowdry, H., & Muriel, A. (2008). Level playing field. The implications of school funding. London: CfBT Education Trust (
  38. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  39. Webber, R., & Butler, T. (2007). Classifying pupils by where they live: How well does this predict variations in their GCSE results. Urban Studies, 44, 1229–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yinger, J. (1995). Closed doors, opportunities lost. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.California State UniversityNorthridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations