Advertisement

Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 817–838 | Cite as

Selective Out-Migration from Florida

  • Andy Sharma
Article

Abstract

I test if selective out-migration of unhealthy seniors explains why disability rates are so much lower for Florida, as compared to the national average. This particular area of research is timely given the significant demographic changes relating to aging. Moreover, this study contributes to the body of literature examining migration with respect to disability and widowhood. Using State Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) and Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA), I create national maps showing disability rates for the following age-groups: 50–59, 60–69, and 70+. After creating maps in ARCGIS and conducting univariate and clustering analysis on mobility disability and personal care limitation, I employ multinomial logit (MNL) analysis to test if individuals with disability are more likely to out-migrate from Florida. The regression analyses lend support to the relaxed Litwak and Longino (The Gerontologist, 27(3): 266–272, 1987) second-move hypothesis, which claims individuals with progressively worse health are more likely to undertake another move to be closer to family and friends. I state “relaxed” because the data does not allow one to determine the reason for migration—only that migration occurred during the past year. This research informs policy-makers to recognize that elderly in better health may migrate to places such as Arizona and Florida due to amenity-seeking behavior, but unhealthy elderly are more likely to leave these states due to assistance-seeking behavior. This out-migration can place excess demand on health services for the incoming regions, which requires state and local government to ensure resources are in place. Also noteworthy, my results are less likely to be flawed by erroneous age and sex data in the public use microdata samples (IPUMS) since I stack the 2006 and 2007 American Community Survey (ACS). A recent working studies by Alexander et al. (Inaccurate age and sex data in the Census PUMS files: Evidence and implications. Munich: CESifo, 2010) shows inaccuracies in the IPUMS for the 1 and 5% 2000 Census, the 2003–2006 ACS, the 2005–2007 3-year ACS, and the 2004–2009 current population survey (CPS) files.

Keywords

Elderly migration Elderly disability Migration and widowhood 

References

  1. Alexander, J. T., Davern, M., & Stevenson, B. (2010). Inaccurate age and sex data in the Census PUMS files: Evidence and implications. Munich: CESifo.Google Scholar
  2. Chernew, M. E., Goldman, D. P., Pan, F., & Shang, B. (2005). Disability and health care spending among medicare beneficiaries. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 24, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conway, K. S., & Jonathan C. R. (2006). State ‘Death’ taxes and elderly migration: The chicken or the egg? National Tax Journal, LIX, 1:98–128.Google Scholar
  4. Conway, K. S., & Rork, J. C. (2010). Going with the flow: A comparison of interstate elderly migration during 1970–2000 using the (I)PUMS versus full census data. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(6), 767–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conway, K. S., & Rork, J. C. (2011). The changing roles of disability, veteran, and socioeconomics status in elderly interstate migration. Research on Aging, 33(3), 256–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Findley, S. E. (1988). The directionality and age selectivity of the health-migration relation: Evidence from sequences of disability and mobility in the United States. The International Migration Review, 22(3), 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fried, T. R., Bradley, E. H., Williams, C. S., & Tinetti, M. E. (2001). Functional disability and health care expenditures for older persons. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 2602–2608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haas, W. H., Bradley, D. E., Longino, C. F., Stoller, E. P., & Serow, W. J. (2006). In retirement migration, who counts? A methodological question with economic policy implications. The Gerontologist, 46(6), 815–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hausman, J., & McFadden, D. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(5), 1219–1240.Google Scholar
  10. He, W., & Jason, P. S. (2003). Internal Migration of the Older Population. Census 2000 Special Reports.Google Scholar
  11. Litwak, E., & Longino, C., Jr. (1987). Migration patterns among the elderly: A developmental perspective. The Gerontologist, 27(3), 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, K., Wall, S., & Wissoker, D. (1997). Disability and medicare costs of elderly persons. The Milbank Quarterly, 75(4), 461–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Longino, C. F., Jr. (1979). Going home: aged return migration in the United States 1965–1970. Journal of Gerontology, 34(5), 736–745.Google Scholar
  14. Longino, C. F., & Bradley, D. E. (2003). A first look at retirement migration trends through 2000. The Gerontologist, 43(6), 904–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Longino, C., Jr., Jackson, D. J., Zimmerman, R. S., & Bradsher, J. E. (1991). The second move: health and geographic mobility. Journal of Gerontology, 46(4), 218–224.Google Scholar
  16. McFadden, D., Train, K., & Tye, W. B. (1977). An application of diagnostic tests for the independence from irrelevant alternatives property of the multinomial logit model. Presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of The Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  17. Parker, M. G., & Thorslund, M. (2007). Health trends in the elderly population: getting better and getting worse. The Gerontologist, 47(2), 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruggles, S., Sobek, M., Alexander, T., Fitch, C. A., Goeken, R., Hall, P. K., et al. (2008). Integrated public use microdata series: version 4.0 [machine-readable database]. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor].Google Scholar
  19. Serow, W. J. (1978). Return migration of the elderly in the USA: 1955–1960 and 1965–1970. Journal of Gerontology, 33(2), 288–295.Google Scholar
  20. Serow, W. J., & Charity, D. A. (1988). Return migration of the elderly in the United States. Recent trends. Research on Aging, 10(2), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sharma, A. (2007). Retiree in-migration patterns for Florida 1980–2005. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of The Southern Demographic Association, Birmingham, AL.Google Scholar
  22. Sharma, A. (2008). Spatial and multinomial analysis of later-life migration into Florida. Paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of The Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  23. Small, K. A., & Hsiao, C. (1985). Multinomial logit specification tests. International Economic Review, 26(3), 619–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Speare, A., Jr., Avery, R., & Lawton, L. (1991). Disability, residential mobility, and changes in living arrangements. Journal of Gerontology, 46(3), 133–142.Google Scholar
  25. StataCorp. (2009). Stata statistical software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  26. US Census. (2000). Census 2000 selected economic characteristics: 2000. US Census Bureau [WWW document.] URL: http://www.census.gov.
  27. US Census. (2006). Design and methodology: American community survey. Technical Paper No. 67. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Senior Economist/University Professor Institute for Public Policy StudiesUniversity of DenverDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations