Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 843–864 | Cite as

The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Economic Well-Being: A Comparison Across Household Types

  • Nicole B. Simpson
  • Jill Tiefenthaler
  • Jameson Hyde
Article

Abstract

Using survey data from Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) recipients in Madison County, New York, we evaluate the effectiveness of the EITC in improving the economic well-being of low-income households. In particular, we examine the impact of the EITC across household types. For tax years 2002 through 2004, we find that the EITC is responsible for significantly lowering the poverty rate of EITC recipients, from 57 to 49%. In fact, for households below the poverty line, the EITC fills 31% of the gap between their adjusted gross income and the poverty line. The EITC has the largest impact on single parent households, lowering their poverty rate by 11.2 percentage points and reducing their poverty gap by almost 35%. However, the EITC has negligible effects on the poorest households in the sample—childless singles. A majority (64%) of EITC recipients intends to use at least some of the refund on basic needs and almost half plan on using part of their refund for debt repayment. This suggests that the EITC helps the majority of recipients get by but does not increase their economic mobility. Somewhat surprisingly, single parent households in the sample are not that different from married parent households in terms of EITC amounts, poverty rates, use of credit, and participation in government programs, despite earning less.

Keywords

EITC Poverty Household types Uses of EITC 

References

  1. Barrow, L., & McGranahan, L. (2001). The effects of the earned income credit on the seasonality of household expenditures. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 1211–1243.Google Scholar
  2. Berube, A., & Thacher, T. (2004). The “state” of low-wage workers: How the EITC benefits urban and rural communities in the 50 states. EITC series. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/reports/2004/02childrenfamilies_berube/20040203_berube.pdf. Cited 14 October 2009
  3. Bucks, B. K., Kennickell, A. B., & Moore, K. B. (2006). Recent changes in U.S. family finances: Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 survey of consumer finances. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 92, A1–A38.Google Scholar
  4. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., & Lee, C. H. (2006). US Census Bureau, current population reports, P60-231, Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States 2005. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2006.Google Scholar
  5. Ellwood, D. T. (2000). The impact of the earned income tax credit and social policy reforms on work, marriage, and living arrangements. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 1063–1105.Google Scholar
  6. Ellwood, D. T., & Sawhill, I. V. (2000). Fixing the marriage penalty in the EITC. The Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2000/0920taxes_ellwood.aspx.
  7. Grogger, J. (2004). Welfare transitions in the 1990s: The economy, welfare policy, and the EITC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(4), 671–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoffman, S. D., & Seidman, L. S. (2003). Helping working families: The earned income tax credit. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.Google Scholar
  9. Holt, S. (2006). The earned income tax credit at age 30: What we know. Metropolitan Policy Program, The Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2006/02childrenfamilies_holt.aspx. Cited 16 March 2009.
  10. Horowitz, J. B. (2002). Income mobility and the earned income tax credit. Economic Inquiry, 40(3), 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hotz, V. J., & Scholz, J. K. (2000). Not perfect, but still pretty good: The EITC and other policies to support the U.S. low-wage labour market. OECD Economic Studies, 31, 25–42.Google Scholar
  12. Hoynes, H. W., Page, M. E., & Stevens, A. H. (2006). Poverty in America: Trends and explanations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, N. (2000). State low-income tax relief: Recent trends. National Tax Journal, 53(3), 403–416.Google Scholar
  14. Kneebone, E. (2008, April). Bridging the gap: Refundable tax credits in metropolitan and rural America. Earned Income Tax Credit Series. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program. http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2008/0414_eitc_kneebone.aspx.
  15. Levitis, J., & Koulish, J. (2008). State earned income tax credits: 2008 legislative update. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/6-6-08sfp.pdf. Cited March 17, 2009.
  16. Mammen, S., & Lawrence, F. C. (2006). How rural working families use the earned income tax credit: A mixed methods analysis. Financial Counseling and Planning, 17(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
  17. Mammen, S., Lawrence, F. C., St. Marie, P., Berry, A. A., & Knight, S. E. (2009). The earned income tax credit and rural families: Differences between participants and non-participants. University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Resource Economics, Working Paper No. 2009-1.Google Scholar
  18. McIntyre, R. S. (2004). A payday bonus. American Prospect Online.Google Scholar
  19. Neumark, D., & Wascher, W. (2001). Using the EITC to help poor families: New evidence and a comparison with the minimum wage. National Tax Journal, 54(2), 281–317.Google Scholar
  20. New York State Department of Labor, Local Area Unemployment Statistics Program and Current Employment Statistics Survey. http://www.labor.state.ny.us/workforceindustrydata.
  21. Porter, K., & Dupree, A. (2001). Poverty trends for families headed by working single mothers. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. http://www.cbpp.org/8-16-01wel.htm. Cited March 16, 2009.
  22. Rhine, S., Su, S., & Osaki, Y. (2005). The earned income tax credit program: Using the EITC as a tool for promoting saving and participation in the banking system. Regional and community affairs report, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Spring.Google Scholar
  23. Romich, J. L., & Weisner, T. (2000). How families view and use the EITC: Advance payment versus lump sum delivery. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 1245–1265.Google Scholar
  24. Smeeding, T. M., Phillips, K. R., & O’Connor, M. (2000). The EITC: Expectation, knowledge, use, and economic and social mobility. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 1187–1209.Google Scholar
  25. US Census Bureau. (2006). Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division, Small Area Estimates Branch, Small Area Income & Poverty Estimates. http://www.census.gov.
  26. US Census Bureau, Population Division, Table 1: Annual estimates of the population for counties of New York: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 (CO-EST2005-01-36), Release Date: March 16, 2006. http://www.census.gov.
  27. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2001). Earned income tax credit participation, GAO-02-290R. December.Google Scholar
  28. Ventry, D. J., Jr. (2000). The collision of tax and welfare politics: The political history of the earned income tax credit, 1969-99. National Tax Journal, 53(4), 983–1026.Google Scholar
  29. Ziliak, J. P. (2004). Filling the poverty gap, then and now. University of Kentucky Working Paper.Google Scholar
  30. Ziliak, J. P. (2005). Understanding poverty rates and gaps: Concepts, trends, and challenges. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 1(3), 127–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole B. Simpson
    • 1
  • Jill Tiefenthaler
    • 2
  • Jameson Hyde
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsColgate UniversityHamiltonUSA
  2. 2.Office of the ProvostWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA
  3. 3.Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLPBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations