Advertisement

Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 105–125 | Cite as

Welfare Exit, Marriage, and Welfare Recidivism: A Reevaluation of Patterns of the 1980s and 1990s

  • Tracy E. RobertsEmail author
  • Steven P. Martin
Article

Abstract

We examine the relationship between marriage and welfare recidivism for women leaving a first welfare spell, using the 1979–2000 panels of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY). Previous studies have found that women who marry around the time of welfare exit have lower rates of welfare return than women who stay single. However, more marriages occur before or after welfare exit than occur at the time of welfare exit. We find that marriages that precede or follow welfare exit by more than 12 months are not associated with significantly lower rates of welfare return. We also confirm previous findings that marriages formed within a year of welfare exit are associated with reduced rates of welfare return. However, these reduced rates mostly indicate later welfare returns rather than fewer welfare returns. Overall, our findings indicate a much weaker association between marriage and welfare independence than has been previously reported for this time period.

Keywords

Welfare Marriage Recidivism 

References

  1. Aldous, J., & Dumond, W. (1990). Family policy in the 1980s: Controversy and consensus. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4), 1136–1151. doi: 10.2307/353324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. T. (1983). Slipping into and out of poverty: The dynamics of spells. National Bureau of Economic Research Working paper No. 1199, September 1983.Google Scholar
  4. Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. T. (1994). Welfare realities: From rhetoric to reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bitler, M., Gelbach, J. B., Hoynes, H. W., & Zavodny, M. (2004). The impact of welfare reform on marriage and divorce. Demography, 41(2), 213–236. doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blank, R. M. (1989). Analyzing the length of welfare spells. Journal of Public Economics, 39(3), 245--273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. L. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cancian, M., & Meyer, D. (2004). Alternative measures of economic success among TANF participants: Avoiding poverty, hardship, and dependence on public assistance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 531–548. doi: 10.1002/pam.20025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao, J. (1996). Welfare recipiency and welfare recidivism: An analysis of the NLSY data. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison: Discussion Paper No. 1081–96.Google Scholar
  10. Carlson, M., Garfinkel, I., McLanahan, S., Mincy, R., & Primus, W. (2004). The effects of welfare and child support policies on union formation. Population Research and Policy Review, 23, 513–542. doi: 10.1007/s11113-004-2707-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherlin, A. J. (2003). Should the government promote marriage? Contexts, 2, 22–29. doi: 10.1525/ctx.2003.2.4.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edin, K. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage? Social Problems, 47(1), 112–133. doi: 10.1525/sp.2000.47.1.03x0282v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Edin, K., & Reed, J. M. (2005). Why don’t they just get married? Barriers to marriage among the disadvantaged. The Future of Children, 15(2), 117–137. doi: 10.1353/foc.2005.0017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald, J. M. (1995). Local labor markets and local area effects on welfare duration. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14(1), 43–67. doi: 10.2307/3325432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goode, W. J. (1960). A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 483–496. doi: 10.2307/2092933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Groothius, P. A., & Gabriel, P. (2005). Positive assortative mating and spouses as complementary factors of production: A theory of labor augmentation. Working Papers, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.Google Scholar
  18. Grossbard-Shechtman, S., & Mincer, J. (2003). Marriage and the economy: Theory and evidence from advanced industrial societies. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris, K. M. (1996). Life after welfare: Women, work, and repeat dependency. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iceland, J. (2003). Why poverty remains high: Reassessing the effect of economic growth, income inequality, and changes in family structure on poverty, 1949–1999. Demography, 40(3), 499–519. (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lerman, R. (2002a). Marriage and the economic well-being of the families with children: A review of the literature. Washington DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lerman, R. (2002b). Impacts of the marital status and parental presence on the material presence of families with children. Washington DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, O. (1966). La vida: A puetro Rican family in the culture of poverty. San Juan and New York. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, R. A., & Sussman, M. B. (1986). Men’s changing roles in the family. NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lichter, D. T., Batson, C. D., & Brown, J. B. (2004). Welfare reform and marriage promotion: The marital expectations and desires of single mothers. Social Service Review, 78, 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lichter, D. T., Graefe, D. R., & Brown, J. B. (2003). Is marriage a Panacea? Union formation among economically disadvantaged unwed mothers. Social Problems, 50(1), 60–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D. K., Kephart, G., & Landry, D. J. (1992). Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? American Sociological Review, 57(6), 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lichter, D. T., Qian, Z., & Mellott, L. M. (2006). Marriage or dissolution? Union transitions among poor cohabiting women. Demography, 43(2), 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLanahan, S., Garfinkel, I., Reichman, N., & Teitler J. (2000). Unwed parents or fragile families? Implications for welfare and child support. Columbia University: Center for Research and Child Well-being. Working Paper 00-04.Google Scholar
  30. McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single-parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McLaughlin, D. K., & Lichter, D. T. (1997). Poverty and the marital behavior of young women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 582–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, D. R., & Cancian, M. (1996). Life after welfare: The economic well-being of women and children following an exit from AFDC. Institute for Research on Poverty: Discussion Paper No. 1101-96.Google Scholar
  33. Moffitt, R. (1990). The effect of the U.S. welfare system on marital status. Journal of Public Economics, 41, 101–124. (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moffitt, R. A., Reville, R., & Winkler, A. E. (1998). Beyond single mothers: Cohabitation and marriage in the AFDC program. Demography, 35(3), 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murray, C. (1984). Losing ground. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  36. O’Neill, J. A., Wolf, D. A., Bassi, L. J., & Hannan, M. T. (1984). An analysis of time on welfare. Report to ASPE/Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute. Statistics 69(2), 241–248, May 1987.Google Scholar
  37. Rank, M. R. (1987). The formation and dissolution of marriages in the welfare population. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(1), 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rector, R., Johnson, K. A., & Fagan, P. F. (2002). The effect of marriage on child poverty. The heritage foundation, Center for Data Analysis Report #02-04, April 15, 2002.Google Scholar
  39. Sandefur, G. D., & Cook, S. T. (1998). Permanent exits from public assistance: The impact of duration, family, and work. Social Forces, 77(2), 63–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sweeney, M. M., & Cancian, M. (2004). The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 1015–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Teitler, J., & Reichman, N., Nepomnyaschy, L., & Garfinkel, I. (2008). Effects of welfare participation on marriage. No 933, Working Papers from Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2004). Table Pov 3: People in families with related children under 18 by family structure, age, and sex, iterated by income-to-poverty ratio and race: 2002 Below 100% of poverty—All races. http://ferret.bls.census.gov/macro/032003/pov/new03_100_01.htm.
  43. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services-Administration for Children and Families. (2002). Percent change in AFDC/TANF families and recipients. August 1996–September 2001. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/news/stats/afdc.htm.
  44. Vaupel, J. W., & Yashin, A. (1985). Heterogeneity’s Ruses: Some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. The American Statistician, 39(3), 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Winkler, A. E. (1995). Does AFDC-UP encourage two-parent families? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14(1), 4–24. (Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations