Advertisement

Fertility Timing of Unmarried and Married Mothers: Evidence on Variation Across U.S. Cities from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study

  • Marah A. Curtis
  • Jane Waldfogel
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the determinants of fertility timing of unmarried and married mothers using a rich new birth cohort study, the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, drawn from 20 medium and large U.S. cities. We find considerable variation in the time to next birth among comparable mothers who live in different cities. Some of this variation is explained by variation in labor markets, housing costs and availability, and welfare policies. City variation is particularly important for unmarried women who already have two or more children, whose fertility is more sensitive to these contextual variables than is the fertility of married women, or unmarried women with just one child.

Keywords

Fertility timing U.S. city variation in fertility Policies and fertility 

References

  1. Acs, G. (1996). The impact of welfare on young mother’s subsequent childbearing decisions. The Journal of Human Resources, 31(4), 898–915. doi: 10.2307/146151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adsera, A. (2005). Where are the babies? Labor market conditions and fertility in Europe. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). Discussion paper No. 1576.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., & Tamura, R. F. (1990). Human capital, fertility, and economic growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 98, S12–S37. doi: 10.1086/261723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjorklund, A. (2006). Does family policy affect fertility? Lessons from Sweden. Journal of Population Economics, 19, 3–24. doi: 10.1007/s00148-005-0024-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blau, F. D., Kahn, L. M., & Waldfogel, J. (2004). The impact of welfare benefits on single motherhood and headship of young women: Evidence from the census. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 382–404. doi: 10.2307/3559019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breslow, N. (1974). Covariance analysis of censored survival data. Biometrika, 30, 89–99.Google Scholar
  7. Butz, W., & Ward, M. P. (1979). Labor markets and fertility: A demographically disaggregate model of US postwar experience. Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
  8. Committee on Ways and Means. (2004). 2004 Green book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  9. Curry, J. P., & Scriven, G. D. (1978). The relationship between apartment living and fertility for blacks, Mexican-Americans, and other Americans in Racine, Wisconsin. Demography, 15(4), 477–485. doi: 10.2307/2061200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtis, M. A. (2007). Subsidized housing, housing prices and the living arrangements of unmarried mothers. Housing Policy Debate, 18(1), 145–170.Google Scholar
  11. Fairlie, R., & London, R. A. (1997). The effect of incremental benefit levels on births to AFDC recipients. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(4), 575–597. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199723)16:4<575::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO;2-D.Google Scholar
  12. Finer, L. B., & Zabin, L. S. (1998). Does the timing of the first family planning visit still matter? Family Planning Perspectives, 30(1), 30–42. doi: 10.2307/2991523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grambsch, P. M., & Therneau, T. M. (1994). Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika, 81, 515–526. doi: 10.1093/biomet/81.3.515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hotz, J. V., Klerman, J. A., & Willis, R. J. (1997). The economics of fertility in developed countries. In M. R. Rosenzweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics, Vol. 1, Part 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, M. E. (2003). Home economics: Metropolitan labor and housing markets and domestic arrangements in young adulthood. Social Forces, 81(4), 1399–1429. doi: 10.1353/sof.2003.0059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leland, J. (2008, February 1). From the housing market to the maternity ward. New York Times.Google Scholar
  17. London, R. A. (2000). The interaction between single mothers’ living arrangements and welfare participation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(1), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malpezzi, S., Chun, G. H., & Green, R. K. (1998). New place-to-place housing price indexes for U.S. metropolitan areas, and their determinants. Real Estate Economics, 26(2), 235–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Moffit, R. A. (1998). The effect of welfare on marriage and fertility: What do we know and what do we need to know?” In R. A. Moffitt (ed.), The effect of welfare on the family and reproductive behavior. National Research Council.Google Scholar
  21. Moffitt, R. A. (2005). Welfare benefits database. Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University. Available from: http://www.econ.jhu.edu/People/Moffitt/DataSets.html.
  22. Nixon, L. (1997). The effect of child support enforcement on marital dissolution. The Journal of Human Resources, 32(1), 159–181. doi: 10.2307/146244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Flaherty, B. (2005). City economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Olsen, E. O. (2002). Housing programs for low-income households. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 8208.Google Scholar
  25. Pong, S.-L. (1994). Sex preference and fertility in peninsular Malaysia. Studies in Family Planning, 25(3), 137–148. doi: 10.2307/2137940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Powell, M. A., & Parcel, T. L. (1997). Effects of family structure on the earnings attainment process: Differences by gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 419–433. doi: 10.2307/353480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sigle-Rushton, W., & McLanahan, S. (2002). The living arrangements of new unmarried mothers. Demography, 39(3), 415–433. doi: 10.1353/dem.2002.0032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2005). A picture of subsidized households—1998. http://www.huduser.org/datasets/assthsg/statedata98/. Last modified 3/31/05.
  29. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2006). Low income housing tax credits. http://www.huduser.org/datasets/lihtc.html. Last modified 10/18/06.
  30. Walker, J. R. (1995). The effect of public policies on recent Swedish fertility behavior. Journal of Population Economics, 8, 223–251. doi: 10.1007/BF00185251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Willis, R. J. (1999). A theory of out of wedlock childbearing. The Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 533–564. doi: 10.1086/250103.Google Scholar
  32. Winkler, A. E. (1992). The impact of housing costs on the living arrangements of single mothers. Journal of Urban Economics, 32, 388. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(92)90026-H.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations