Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Network Methodology in the Study of Disasters: Issues and Insights Prompted by Post-Katrina Research

  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamic social networks, a key concept in modern social science research, are beginning to play a major role in understanding the ways in which individuals and communities respond to disasters. The authors of this paper review the relevant theory and research regarding how crises cause change in social networks, and how those changes may or may not facilitate recovery, as a function of the kinds of changes that occur. It applies the In/Out/Seeker/Provider (IOSP) framework to identify categories in which we might study disasters and the impact both on the networks and the impacts to the networks. This paper details options for applying social network analysis to research of both pre- and post-disaster settings and concludes by framing a research agenda for the future study of the dynamics of network change following a disaster.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks, D., & Carley, K. (1996). Models for network evolution. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21, 173–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearman, P., Moody, J., & Stovel, K. (2004). Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 44–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, D., Tao, L., & McLaughlin, D. (2004). An embedded network approach for scale-up of fluctuation-driven systems with preservation of spike information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 14288–14293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatters, L. M., Taylor, R. J., & Neighbors, H. W. (1989). Size of informal helper network mobilized during a serious personal problem among black Americans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 667–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, L. K., & Haase, T. W. (2006). Communication, coherence, and collective action. Public Works Management & Policy, 10(4), 328–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N., & Monge, P. (2002). Managing knowledge networks. Management Communications Quarterly, 16, 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contractor, N., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesner, J., & Carley, K. (2005). Revealing social structure from texts: Meta-matrix text analysis as a novel method for network text analysis. In V. K. Narayanan & D. J. Armstrong (Eds.), Causal mapping for information systems and technology research: Approaches, advances, and illustrations (Chap. 4, pp. 81–108). Harrisburg, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

  • Diesner, J., Frantz, T., & Carley, K. M. (2006). Communication networks from the Enron Email Corpus. Journal of Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 11, 201–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, K., Corman, S., & Ballard, D. (2004). Centering resonance analysis: A superior data mining algorithm for textural data streams. Pentagon, Washington DC, Department of Defense, 81 pp.

  • Drabek, T. E. (1986). Human responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T. E., & Key, W. H. (1984). Conquering disaster: Family recovery and long-term consequences. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. L. K. (1998). An interdisciplinary perspective on disasters and stress: The promise of an ecological framework. Sociological Forum, 13(1), 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figley, C. R. (1986). Trauma and its wake, Volume II: Traumatic stress theory, research and intervention. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J., Flanagin, A., Kalman, M., Monge, P., & Ryan, T. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6(1), 60–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V., Beggs, J. J., & Hurlbert, J. S. (2002). Exploring structural contexts of the support process: Social networks, social statuses, social support, and psychological distress. Advances in Medical Sociology, 8, 271–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V., Hurlbert, J. S., & Beggs, J. J. (1996). Exploring the determinants of support provision: Provider characteristics, personal networks, community contexts, and support following life events. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37(3), 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V., Hurlbert, J. S., & Beggs, J. J. (1999). Taking the environment seriously: A respecification and test of the disaster framing of the stress process. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 17, 367–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, J. S., Beggs, J. J., & Haines, V. (2005). Bridges over troubled waters: What are the optimal networks for Katrina’s victims? New York: Social Science Research Council. http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org.

  • Hurlbert, J. S., Haines, V., & Beggs, J. J. (2000). Core networks and tie activation: What kinds of routine networks allocate resources in nonroutine situations? American Sociological Review, 65, 598–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu, N. (2005a). Interagency communication networks during emergencies: Boundary spanners in multiagency coordination. American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu, N. (2005b). Interorganizational coordination in dynamic context: Networks in emergency response management. Connections, 26(2), 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu, N., & Van Wart, M. (2006). The evolving role of the public sector in managing catastrophic disasters: Lessons learned. Administration & Society, 38(3), 279–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, V. (2002). Uncloaking terrorist networks. First Monday (Vol. 7). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/krebs/.

  • Marsden, P. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P., Fulk, J., Kalman, M., Flanagin, A., Parnassa, C., & Rumsey, S. (1998). Production of collective action in alliance-based interorganizational communication and information systems. Organization Science, 9(3), 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J., McFarland, D. A., & Bender-deMoll, S. (2005). Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1206–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1999). Organizing to reduce the vulnerabilities of complexity. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 7(3), 150–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prell, C. (2003). Community networking and social capital: Early investigations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L., & Dynes, R. R. (1977). Response to social crisis and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, G. L., Pattison, P. E., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2005). A Workshop on Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Social Networks. Social Networks Working Paper No 2/05. Psychology Department, University of Melbourne.

  • Robins, G. L., Snijders, T. A. B., & Wang, P. (2005). Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks Working Paper No 2/05. Psychology Department, University of Melbourne.

  • Robinson, S. E., Berrett, B., & Stone, K. (2006). The development of collaboration of response to Hurricane Katrina in the Dallas area. Public Works Management & Policy, 10(4), 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanil, A., Banks, D., & Carley, K. (1995). Models for evolving fixed node networks: Model fitting and model testing. Social Networks, 17(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuldes, S. (2007). LPNet. http://www.cl.uni-heidelberg.de/~schuldes/LPNet/index.shtml, 2007.

  • Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, Y., Fischer, C. S., & Koresh, Y. (1994). Kin and nonkin under collective threat: Israeli networks during the gulf war. Social Forces, 72(4), 1197–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. D. (1985). Enhancing social support for disaster victims. In B. J. Sowder (Ed.), Disasters and mental health: Contemporary perspectives. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S. D. (1986). Mobilizing social support networks in times of disaster. In C. R. Figley (Ed.), Trauma and its wake, Volume II: Traumatic stress theory, research and intervention. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, R. A., & Quarantelli, E. L. (1985). Emergent citizen groups and emergency management. Public Administration Review, 45(Special issue), 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S., & Frank, O. (2000). Model-based estimation with link-tracing sampling designs. Survey Methodology, 26(1), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, K. J. (1985). Emergency medical preparedness and response in disasters: The need for interorganizational coordination. Public Administration Review, 45(Special issue), 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, J., & Robins, G. L. (2005). An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p*. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & J. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 148–161). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 0555115, 0555934, 0555136, 0601731. We would like to thank Larry Suter for his support and guidance of this work and David Swanson for his editorial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle M. Varda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varda, D.M., Forgette, R., Banks, D. et al. Social Network Methodology in the Study of Disasters: Issues and Insights Prompted by Post-Katrina Research. Popul Res Policy Rev 28, 11–29 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9110-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9110-9

Keywords

Navigation