Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 593–618 | Cite as

Parental Cohabitation Experiences and Adolescent Behavioral Outcomes

Article

Abstract

Children are increasingly spending time in cohabiting parent families. Most studies that examine the implications of parental cohabitation focus on parental living arrangements at a single point in time. Using data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), we assess whether and how parental cohabitation during childhood influences adolescent girls’ well-being. This work moves beyond prior studies by specifically considering the effects of the exposure to, transitions, and age at which children lived in cohabiting parent families. The results indicate living in cohabiting parent families is consequential for earlier sexual initiation, likelihood of having a teen birth, and high school graduation. Prior work suggests that the explanation for the negative effect of parental cohabitation is family instability. Yet, our empirical work shows that family instability does not explain the relationship between cohabitation and negative child outcomes. We conclude that the best way to understand the implications of parental cohabitation is to adopt a dynamic family experience model.

Keywords

Cohabitation Family structure 

References

  1. Acs, G., & Nelson, S. (2002). The kids are alright? Children’s well-being and the rise in cohabitation. New Federalism B-48: National Survey of America’s Families. Washington D.C: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. (1991). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, S. (2002). Child well-being in cohabiting families. In Alan Booth & Ann C. Crouter (Eds.) Just living together: Implications for children, families, and public policy (pp. 173–188). Lawrence-Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S. (2004). Family structure and child well-being: The significance of parental cohabitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, S. (2006). Family structure transitions and adolescent well-being. Demography, 43, 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, S., & Manning, W. (2004). Family structure measurement: Reconciling adolescents and mother reports of cohabiting stepfamilies. Working Paper 2004-08, Center for Family and Demographic Research. Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
  7. Buchanan, C., Maccoby, E., & Dornbusch, S. (1996). Adolescents after divorce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bumpass, L., Raley, K., & Sweet, J. (1995). The changing character of stepfamilies: Implications of cohabitation and nonmarital childbearing. Demography, 32, 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carlson, M., & Corcoran, M. (2001). Family structure and children’s behavioral and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 779–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cavanagh, S., & Huston, A. (2006). Family instability and children’s early problem behavior. Social Forces, 85, 551–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavanagh, S., Schiller, K., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (2006). Marital transitions, parenting, and schooling: Exploring the link between family-structure history and adolescents’ academic status. Sociology of Education, 79, 329–354.Google Scholar
  13. Chase-Landale, P. L., & Hetherington, E. M. (1990). The impact of divorce on life-span development: Short- and long-term effect. In D. L. Featherman & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 105–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Cherlin, A. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 634–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark, R., & Nelson, S. (2000). Beyond the two-parent family. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1288–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooksey, E. C., Mott, F. L., & Neubauer, S. A. (2002). Friendships and early relationships: Links to sexual initiation among American adolescents born to young mothers. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 118–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, E. C., & Friel, L. V. (2001). Adolescent sexuality: Disentangling the effects of family structure and family context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 669–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2002). Good things come in threes: Single-Parent multigenerational family structure and adolescent adjustment. Demography, 39, 393–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunifon, R., & Kowalski-Jones, L. (2002). Who’s in the house? Race differences in cohabitation, single-parenthood, and child development. Child Development, 73, 1249–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Durst, R. (1997). Ties that bind: Drafting enforceable cohabitation agreements. New Jersey Law Journal, 147, S13–S14.Google Scholar
  22. Fields, J. (2001). Living arrangements of children. Current Population Reports P70–74. U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  23. Fishman, B. (1983). The economic behavior of stepfamilies. Family Relations, 32, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garasky, S. (1995). The effects of family structure on educational attainment: Do the effects vary by the age of the child? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 54, 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graefe, D. R., & Lichter, D. (1999). Life course transitions of American children: Parental cohabitation, marriage, and single parenthood. Demography, 36, 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hao, L., & Xie, G. (2001). The complexity of endogeneity of family structure in explaining children’s misbehavior. Social Science Research, 31, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hanson, T. L., McLanahan, S., & Thomson, E. (1997). Economic resources, parental practices, and children’s well-being. In G. J. Duncan & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Consequences of growing up poor (pp. 190–238). New York: Russell Sage Foundations.Google Scholar
  28. Hetherington, E. (1989). Coping with family transitions: Winners, losers, and survivors. Child Development, 60, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill, M., Yeung, W., & Duncan, G. (2001). Childhood family structure and young adult behaviors. Journal of Population Economics, 14, 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hofferth, S., & Anderson, K. (2003). Are all dads equal? Biology versus marriage as a basis for paternal investment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katzev, A., Warner, R., & Acock, A. (1994). Girls or boys–relationship of child gender to marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krein, S. F., & Beller, A. H. (1988). Educational attainment of children from single-parent families: Differences by exposure, gender, and race. Demography, 25, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Longmore, M. A., Manning, W. D., & Giordano, P. C. (2001). Preadolescent parenting strategies and teens’ dating and sexual initiation: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mahoney, M. (2002). The economic rights and responsibilities of unmarried cohabitants. In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 247)–254). Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Manning, W. (2002). The implications of cohabitation for children’s well-being. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications for children, families, and public policy (pp. 121–152). Lawrence-ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  36. Manning, W., & Brown, S. (2006). Children’s economic well-being in married and cohabiting families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manning, W., & Bulanda, R. (2006). Cohabitation and family trajectories. In S. Hofferth & L. Casper (Eds.), Handbook of measurement issues in family research (pp. 199–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Manning, W., & Lamb, K. (2003). Adolescent well-being in cohabiting, married, and single-parent families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 876–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manning, W., & Landale, N. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in the role of cohabitation in premarital childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Manning, W., Smock, P., & Majumdar, D. (2002). The relative stability of cohabiting and marital unions for children. Center for Family and Demographic Research Working Paper 2002−18.Google Scholar
  41. McLanahan, S., & Booth, K. (1989). Mother-only families: Problems, prospects, and politics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Moore, M. R., & Chase-Landale, P. L. (2001). Sexual intercourse and pregnancy among African American girls in high-poverty neighborhoods: The role of family and perceived community environment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1146–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morgan, S., Lye, D., & Condron, G. (1988). Sons, daughters and the risk of marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 110–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morrison, D. R. (1998). Child well-being in step families and cohabiting unions following divorce: A dynamic appraisal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago.Google Scholar
  46. Morrison, D. R. (2000). The costs of economic uncertainty: Child well being in cohabitating and remarried unions following parental divorce. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  47. Morrison, D. R., & Cherlin, A. J. (1995). The divorce process and young children’s well-being: A prospective analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 800–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Osborne, C., Manning, W., & Smock, P. (2007). Married and cohabiting parents, relationship stability: A focus on race and ethnicity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1345–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Powell, M. A., & Parcel, T. L. (1997). Effects of family structure on the earnings attainment process: Differences by gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Raley, R. K., & Wildsmith, E. (2004). Cohabitation and children’s family instability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Raley, R. K., Frisco, M., & Wildsmith, E. (2005). Maternal Cohabitation and Educational Success. Sociology of Education, 78, 144–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rodgers, K. B., & Rose, H. A. (2002). Risk and resiliency factors among adolescents who experience marital transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 1024–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sandefur, G. D., McLanahan, S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (1992). The effects of parental marital status during adolescence on high school graduation. Social Forces, 71, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seff, M. (1995). Cohabitation and the law. Marriage and Family Review, 21, 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smock, P. J., & Gupta, S. (2002). What is the role of cohabitation in contemporary North American family structure? In A. Booth & A. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 53–84). Mahwah New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  58. Spruijt, E., & Goede, M. (1997). Transitions in family structure and adolescent well-being. Adolescence, 32, 897–911.Google Scholar
  59. Thomson, E., McLanahan, S. S., & Curtin, R. B. (1992). Family structure, gender, and parental socialization. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 368–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomson, E., Hanson, T., & McLanahan, S. (1994). Family structure and child well-being: Economic resources vs. parental behavior. Social Forces, 73, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Trivers, R. (1974). Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 14, 249–264.Google Scholar
  62. Wiesensale, S., & Heckart, K. (1993). Domestic partnerships: A concept paper and policy discussion. Family Relations, 42, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wojtkiewicz, R. (1993). Simplicity and complexity in the effects of high school graduation. Demography, 30, 701–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu, L., & Martinson, B. (1993). Family structure and the risk of a premarital birth. American Sociological Review, 58, 210–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wu, L., & Thomson, E. (2001). Race differences in family experience sexual initiation: Dynamic models of family structure and family change. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 682–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and GerontologyMiami UniversityOxfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic ResearchBowling Green State University Bowling Green USA

Personalised recommendations