Advertisement

Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 139–159 | Cite as

Changing the Gender Balance in Caring: Fatherhood and the Division of Parental Leave in Norway

  • Trude Lappegard
Article

Abstract

In this article, we study fathers’ use of parental leave in Norway, using register data from 1993 to 1997. In 1993, a special father’s quota (1 month) was introduced in the parental leave program. The father’s quota is a success in the sense that 85% of fathers entitled to the leave use it, but few take more than their quota (1 month). One policy intention was to make a real change in the gender balance in care. The analyses show that gender balance in breadwinning has a strong effect on fathers’ use of parental leave: controlling for parents’ educational level, labor market attachment and father’s income, we find that the more mothers contribute to the family economy and the more equalized their earnings are, the more parental leave fathers take.

Keywords

Gender Childcare Parental leave Fatherhood Norway 

References

  1. Aldous, J., Mulligan, G. M., & Bjarnason, T. (1998). Fathering over time: What makes the difference? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 809–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society—towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Malden, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. (1981,1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bernhardt, E. (2000). Familj och karriär. Välfärds Bulletinen, 4, 4–5.Google Scholar
  6. Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2001). Flexible work and flexible fathers. Work, Family and Society, 15, 251–267.Google Scholar
  7. Coltraine, S., & Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1992). Men’s housework: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutsch, F. M., Lussier, J. B., & Servis, L. J. (1993). Husbands at home: Predictors of paternal participation in childcare and housework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1154–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen, M. N. (1995). Kjønnssegregering i det norske arbeidsmarkedet. Kan forskjeller i lønnsstruktur bidra til at kvinner og menn velger ulike yrker? Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 2, 147–177.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs, S. C. (1995). Changing patterns of sex segregated occupations throughout the life-course. European Sociological Review, 11(2), 157–171.Google Scholar
  11. Kitterød, R. H. (2002a). Utdanning og ulikhet? En diskusjon av utdanningsnivåets betydning for deling av husarbeid blant småbarnsforeldre. Sosiologisk tidsskrift, 3, 179–208.Google Scholar
  12. Kitterød, R. H. (2002b). Store endringer i småbarnsforeldres dagligliv. Samfunnsspeilet, 4/5, 14–22.Google Scholar
  13. Kitterød, R. H., & Kjeldstad, R. (2003). A new father’s role? Employment pattern among Norwegian fathers 1991–2001. Economic Survey, 1, 39–51.Google Scholar
  14. Kitterød, R. H., & Kjeldstad, R. (2004). Foreldres arbeidstid 1991–2001 belyst ved SSBs arbeidskraftsundersøkelser, tidsbruksundersøkelser og levekårsundersøkelser. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  15. Kjeldstad, R., & Nymoen, E. (2004). Kvinner og menn i deltidsarbeid - Fordeling og forklaringer. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  16. Leira, A. (1998). Caring as social right: Cash for childcare and daddy leave. Social Politics, 5, Fall, 362–378.Google Scholar
  17. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. National Insurance Association. (2002). Basisrapport 2001 - Mellomlangsiktig budsjettering og rapportering (Vol. 01). Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  19. Pettersen, S. V. (2003). Halvparten av fedrene vil ha lengre kvote. Samfunnsspeilet, 5, 39–48.Google Scholar
  20. Polachek, S. W. (1987). Occupational segregation and the gender wage gap. Population Research and Policy Review, 6, 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ross, C. E. (1987). The division of labor at home. Social Forces, 65, 816–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Statistics Norway. (1994). Standard Industrial Classification. Official Statistics of Norway, C467.Google Scholar
  24. Statistics Norway. (2001a). Labor Force Survey. Official Statistics of Norway, C748.Google Scholar
  25. Statistics Norway. (2001b). Stable number of cohabitants. Cohabitants 2001. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/subjects/02/01/20/Samboer_en/arkiv.
  26. Statistics Norway. (2002). Barn og unges familier - Færre ektepar med barn under 18 år. SSB magasin. Retrieved from http://www.ssb.no/emner/02/barn_og_unge/2002/famili.
  27. Sundström, M., & Duvander, A. -Z. E. (2002). Gender division of childcare and the sharing of parental leave among new parents in Sweden. European Sociological Review, 18(4), 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Texmon, I. (1999). Vedlegg 3: Samliv i Norge mot slutten av 1900-tallet. En beskrivelse av endringer og mangfold. In Norges offentlige utredninger (NOU) (Ed.), Samboere og samfunnet, 25(pp. 251–285). Barne-og familiedepartementet.Google Scholar
  29. Volling, B. L., & Belsky, J. (1991). Multiple determinants of father involvement during infancy in dual-earner and single-earner families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division for Social and Demographic ResearchOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations