Advertisement

Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 1–29 | Cite as

Explaining son preference in rural India: the independent role of structural versus individual factors

  • Rohini P. PandeEmail author
  • Nan Marie Astone
Original Paper

Abstract

Much research has been done on demographic manifestations of son preference, particularly girls’ excess mortality; however, there is less research that focuses on son preference itself. This paper analyzes the determinants of son preference in rural India. We separate the independent, relative effects of characteristics of individual women and their households, village opportunities for women and village development, and social norms. We look at both socioeconomic and sociocultural variables. Finally, we examine whether predictors of son preference differ by desired family size. Our data come from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) India, 1992–1993. We use an ordered logit model, with dummy variables for state of residence. Our analysis shows that women’s education, particularly at secondary and higher levels, is consistently and significantly associated with weaker son preference, regardless of desired family size. Once factors measuring social norms, such as marriage customs, caste and religion, are included, economic wealth and women’s employment at household or village levels are not significant. Media access remains significant, suggesting an influence of “modernizing” ideas. Among social factors, caste and religion are associated with son preference but, once state of residence is controlled for, marriage patterns and cultivation patterns are insignificant. The strength and significance for son preference of many determinants differs by desired family size. Our results suggest that policy makers seeking to influence son preference need to identify and target different policy levers to women in different fertility and social contexts, rather than try an approach of one size that fits all.

Keywords

Discrimination Gender India Inequality Son preference 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is based on the first author’s doctoral thesis while at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Support for this research was provided by the Hewlett Foundation, The Population Council, and the Mellon Foundation. The authors thank Drs. Ken Hill, Anju Malhotra, and Kathryn Yount for their comments.

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge, England: University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, F., Kishor, S., & Roy, T. K. (2002). Sex selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 739–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, F., Minja, K. C., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies, 52(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bairagi, R. (2001). Effects of sex preference on contraceptive use, abortion and fertility in Matlab, Bangladesh. International Family Planning Perspectives, 27(3), 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltiwala, S. (1994). The meaning of women’s empowerment: New concepts from action. In G. Sen, A. Germain, & L. C. Chen (Eds.), Population policies reconsidered: Health, empowerment and rights (pp. 127–138). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Banister, J. (2003). Shortage of girls in China today: Causes, consequences, international comparisons, and solutions. Beijing Javelin Investments.Google Scholar
  7. Banthia, J. K. (2001). Provisional population totals: India. Census of India 2001, Series 1, India, Paper 1 of 2001. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General.Google Scholar
  8. Bardhan, P. K. (1974). On life and death questions. Economic and Political Weekly, Special Number, 1293–1304.Google Scholar
  9. Barua, A., & Kurz, K. (2001). Reproductive health-seeking by married adolescent girls in Maharashtra India. Reproductive Health Matters, 9(17), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basu, A. M. (1989). Is discrimination in food really necessary for explaining sex differentials in childhood mortality? Population Studies, 43(2), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Basu, A. M., & Basu, K. (1991). Women’s economic roles and child survival: The case of India. Health Transition Review, 1(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
  12. Belanger, D. (2002). Son preference in a rural village in North Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 33(4), 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhuiya, A., & Streatfield, K. (1991). Mothers’ education and survival of female children in a rural area of Bangladesh. Population Studies, 45, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bloomfield, M. (1897). Sacred books of the East, Vol. 42. Retrieved from http://www.sacred-texts.com/.Google Scholar
  15. Bourne, K. L., & Walker, G. M. (1991). The differential effect of mothers’ education on mortality of boys and girls in India. Population Studies, 45(2), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cain, M. T. (1988). The material consequences of reproductive failure in rural south Asia. In D. Dwyer & J. Bruce (Eds.), A home divided: Women and income in the Third World (pp. 20–38). Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cain, M. T. (1993). Patriarchal structure and demographic change. In N. Federici, K. O. Mason, & S. Sogner (Eds.), Women’s position and demographic change (pp. 43–60). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chan, A., & Yeoh, B. (2002). Gender, family and fertility in Asia: An introduction. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 17(2), 5–10.Google Scholar
  19. Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Das Gupta, M. (1987). Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Population and Development Review, 13(1), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Das Gupta, M. (1995). Life course perspectives on women’s autonomy and health outcomes. American Anthropologist, 97(3), 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Das Gupta, M., & Bhat, P. N. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies, 51(3), 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Das Gupta, M., & Shuzhuo, L. (1999). Gender bias in China, South Korea and India 1920–1990: Effects of war, famine and fertility decline. Development and Change, 30(3), 619–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dharmalingam, A. (1996). The social context of family size preferences and fertility behaviour in a south Indian village. Genus, 52(1–2), 83–103.Google Scholar
  25. Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.Google Scholar
  27. Government of India (1995). Economic survey 1994–1995. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Finance, Economic Division.Google Scholar
  28. Govindaswamy, P., & Ramesh, B. M. (1996). Maternal education and gender bias in child care practices in India. Paper presented at the Population Association of America, New Orleans LA, 9–11 May 1996.Google Scholar
  29. Griffiths, P., Matthews, Z., & Hinde, A. (2000). Understanding the sex ratio in India: A simulation approach. Demography, 37(4), 477–488.Google Scholar
  30. International Institute for Population Sciences [IIPS] (1995). National family health survey (MCH and family planning) India 1992–93. Bombay, India: IIPS.Google Scholar
  31. Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1996). Women’s autonomy and reproductive behaviour in India: Linkages and influence of sociocultural context. Paper presented at the Seminar on Comparative Perspectives on Fertility Transition in South Asia, Islamabad-Rawalpindi, Pakistan, 17–20 December 1996.Google Scholar
  32. Karve, I. (1965). Kinship organization in India. Bombay, India: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
  33. Kennedy, P. (1996). A guide to econometrics, 3rd edn. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kishor, S. (1993). May God give sons to all: Gender and child mortality in India. American Sociological Review, 58(2), 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kishor, S. (1995). Gender differentials in child mortality: A review of the evidence. In M. Das Gupta, L. C. Chen, & T. N. Krishnan (Eds.), Women’s health in India: Risk and vulnerability (pp. 19–54). Bombay, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Leone, T., Matthews, Z., & Zuanna, G. D. (2003). Impact and determinants of sex preference in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives, 29(2), 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liang, K., & Zeger, S. L. (1993). Regression analysis for correlated data. Annual Review of Public Health, 14, 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Makinson, C. (1994). Discrimination against the female child. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 46(2), 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malhotra, A., Pande, R., & Grown, C. (2003). Impact of investments in female education on gender equality. International Center for Research on Women.Google Scholar
  40. Malhotra, A., & Schuler, S. (2005). Women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. In D. Narayan (Ed.), Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 71–88). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  41. Mandelbaum, D. G. (1988). Women’s seclusion and men’s honor. Sex roles in North India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. Tucson AZ: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mayer, P. (1999). India’s falling sex ratios. Population and Development Review, 25(2), 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 37. New York: Chapman and Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, B. D. (1981). The endangered sex: Neglect of female children in rural North India. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Miller, B. D. (1989). Changing patterns of juvenile sex ratios in rural India, 1961 to 1971. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(2), 1229–1236.Google Scholar
  46. Mishra, V., Roy, T. K., & Retherford, R. D. (2004). Sex differentials in childhood feeding, health care and nutritional status in India. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender inequality and fertility in two Nepali villages. Population and Development Review, 21(3), 541–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Muhuri, P. K., & Preston, S. H. (1991). Effects of family composition on mortality differentials by sex among children in Matlab, Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 17(3), 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy, R. (2003). Fertility and distorted sex ratios in a rural Chinese country: Culture, state and policy. Population and Development Review, 29(4), 595–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murthi, M., Guio, A., & Dreze, J. (1995). Mortality, fertility and gender bias in India: A district-level analysis. Population and Development Review, 21(4), 745–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murthy, R. K. (1996). Fighting female infanticide by working with midwives: An Indian case study. Gender and Development: Women and the Family, 4(2), 20–27.Google Scholar
  52. Oldenburg, P. (1992). Sex ratio, son preference and violence in India: A research note. Economic and Political Weekly, 27(49 & 50), 2657–2662.Google Scholar
  53. Oomman, N., & Ganatra, B. R. (2002). Sex selection: The systematic elimination of girls. Reproductive Health Matters, 10(19), 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pande, R. P. (1999). Grant a girl elsewhere, here grant a boy: Gender and health outcomes among rural Indian children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  55. Pande, R. (2003). Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: The role of siblings. Demography, 40(3), 395–418.Google Scholar
  56. Pande, R. P., & Yazbeck, A. (2003). What’s in a country average? Wealth, gender and regional inequalities in immunization in India. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 2075–2088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Park, C. B., & Cho, N. (1995). Consequences of son preference in low-fertility society: Imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and Development Review, 21(1), 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rahman, L., & Rao, V. (2004). The determinants of gender equity in India: Examining Dyson and Moore’s thesis with new data. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 239–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Srinivas, M. N. (1976). The remembered village. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Vlassoff, C. (1990). The value of sons in an Indian village: How widows see it. Population Studies, 44(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yount, K. M. (2001). Excess mortality of girls in the Middle East in the 1970s and 1980s: Patterns, correlates, and gaps in research. Population Studies, 55(3), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yount, K. M., Langsten, R., & Hill, K. (2000). The effect of gender preference on contraceptive use and fertility in rural Egypt. Studies in Family Planning, 31(4), 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Center for Research on WomenWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Population and Family Health SciencesThe Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public HealthBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations