Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 175–195

Does regional variation affect ecological mortality research? An examination of mortality, income inequality and health infrastructure in the Mississippi Delta

Original Paper

Abstract

Mortality research has often focused on individual-level, socioeconomic, and demographic factors indicating health outcomes. Consistent with a recent trend in the public health field, this research examines mortality at the aggregate, contextual level. Based on Wilkinson’s relative income hypothesis, specifically being manifest through an underinvestment in social goods including health infrastructure, the focus of this study is a regional examination in the effects of income inequality on mortality at the county level. Health infrastructure is included as a mediating variable in the relationship between income inequality and mortality, relating back to Wilkinson’s work. Unlike previous research, regional differences in this relationship are examined to identify variation at the county level in health outcomes. The Mississippi Delta is an adequate test bed to examine the relationship between these variables based on its socioeconomic, demographic, and high inequality characteristics. It is hypothesized that Delta-designated counties within the three-state Delta region distinguish a significant positive relationship between income inequality and mortality, that this relationship is stronger than in non-Delta classified counties, and that health infrastructure significantly mediates the relationship between income inequality and mortality.

Keywords

Delta Income inequality Infrastructure Mortality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aday, L. A., Quill, B. E., & Reyes-Gibby, C. C. (2001). Equity in rural health, health care. In S. Loue, & B. E. Quill (Eds.), Handbook of rural health (pp. 44–72). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Ashton, C. M., Peterson, N. J., Souchek, J., Menke, T. J., Yu, H.-J., Pietz, K., Eigenbrodt, M. L., Barbour, G., Kizer, K. W., & Wray, N. P. (1999). Geographic variations in utilization rates in veterans affairs hospitals and clinics. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(1), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond Huie, S. A. (2001). The concept of neighborhood in health and mortality research. Sociological Spectrum, 21, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchard, T. C., Cossman, J. S., & Levin, M. L. (2004). Multiple meanings of minority concentration: Incorporating contextual explanations into the analysis of individual-level U.S. black mortality outcomes. Population Research and Policy Review, 23(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cossman, R. E., Cossman, J. S., Jackson, R., & Cosby, A. (2003). Mapping high or low mortality places across time in the U.S.: A research note on a health visualization and analysis project. Health and Place, 9(4), 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daly, M. C., Duncan, G., Kaplan, G. A., & Lynch, J. W. (1998). Macro-to-micro linkages in the relationship between income inequality and mortality. The Milbank Quarterly, 76(3), 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Health and Human Services. Compressed mortality file summary 1979–1998. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  8. Ellison, G. T. H. (2002). Letting the Gini out of the bottle? Challenges facing the relative income hypothesis. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 561–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farmer, F. L., Stokes, C. S., Fiser, R. H., & Papini, D. P. (1991). Poverty, primary care and age-specific mortality. The Journal of Rural Health, 7(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feinstein, J. S. (1993). The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: A review of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly, 71(2), 279–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franzini, L., Ribble, J., & Spears, W. (2001). The effects of income inequality and income level on mortality vary by population size in Texas counties. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hummer, R. A., Rogers, R. G., & Eberstein, I. W. (1998). Sociodemographic differentials in adult mortality: A review of analytic approaches. Population and Development Review, 24(3), 553–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kahn, R. S., Wise, P. H., Kennedy, B. P., & Kawachi, I. (2000). State income inequality, household income, and maternal mental and physical health: Cross sectional national survey. British Medical Journal, 321(25), 1311–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaplan, G. A., Pamuk, E. R., Lynch, J. W., Cohen, R. D., & Balfour, J. L. (1996). Inequality in income and mortality in the US: Analysis of mortality and potential pathways. British Medical Journal, 312, 999–1003.Google Scholar
  15. Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1999). Income inequality and health: Pathways and mechanisms. Health Services Research, 34(1), 215.Google Scholar
  16. Lynch, J. W., & Kaplan, G. A. (1997). Understanding how inequality in the distribution of income affects health. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 297–314.Google Scholar
  17. McLaughlin, D. K. (2002). Changing income inequality in nonmetropolitan counties, 1980 to 1990. Rural Sociology, 67(4), 512–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Politzer, R. M., Harris, D. L., Gaston, M. H., & Mullan, F. (1991). Primary care physician supply and the medically underserved: A status report and recommendations. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266(1), 104–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ricketts, T. C. (2000). The changing nature of rural health care. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rogers, R. G., Hummer, R. A., & Nam, C. B. (2000). Living and dying in the USA: Behavioral, health, and social differentials of adult mortality. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Seccombe, K., & Amey, C. (1995). Playing by the rules and losing: Health insurance and the working poor. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(2), 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shi, L. (1994). Primary care, specialty care, and life chances. International Journal of Health Services, 24(3), 431–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shi, L., Starfield, B., Kennedy, B., & Kawachi, I. (1999). Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators. The Journal of Family Practice, 48(4), 275–284.Google Scholar
  24. Siegel, J. S., & Swanson, D. A. (2004). Studies in population: The methods and materials of demography. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Starfield, B. (1992). Primary care and health: A cross-national comparison. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266(16), 2268–2271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Subramanian S. V., Kawachi I., & Kennedy B. P. (2001). Does the state you live in make a difference? Multilevel analysis of self-rated health in the US. Social Science and Medicine, 53, 9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tobler, W. R. (1970). A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Welch, W. P., Miller, M. E., Welch, H. G., Fisher, E. S., & Wennberg, J. E. (1993). Geographic variation in expenditures for physicians’ services in the U.S. The New England Journal of Medicine, 328(9), 621–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkinson, R. G. (1992). Income distribution and life expectancy. British Medical Journal, 304(18), 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilkinson, R. G. (1997). Health inequalities: Relative or absolute material standards. British Medical Journal, 314(22), 591–595.Google Scholar
  31. Wilkinson, R. G. (1999). Two pathways, but how much do they diverge? British Medical Journal, 319, 956–957.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations