Does regional variation affect ecological mortality research? An examination of mortality, income inequality and health infrastructure in the Mississippi Delta
- 146 Downloads
Mortality research has often focused on individual-level, socioeconomic, and demographic factors indicating health outcomes. Consistent with a recent trend in the public health field, this research examines mortality at the aggregate, contextual level. Based on Wilkinson’s relative income hypothesis, specifically being manifest through an underinvestment in social goods including health infrastructure, the focus of this study is a regional examination in the effects of income inequality on mortality at the county level. Health infrastructure is included as a mediating variable in the relationship between income inequality and mortality, relating back to Wilkinson’s work. Unlike previous research, regional differences in this relationship are examined to identify variation at the county level in health outcomes. The Mississippi Delta is an adequate test bed to examine the relationship between these variables based on its socioeconomic, demographic, and high inequality characteristics. It is hypothesized that Delta-designated counties within the three-state Delta region distinguish a significant positive relationship between income inequality and mortality, that this relationship is stronger than in non-Delta classified counties, and that health infrastructure significantly mediates the relationship between income inequality and mortality.
KeywordsDelta Income inequality Infrastructure Mortality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aday, L. A., Quill, B. E., & Reyes-Gibby, C. C. (2001). Equity in rural health, health care. In S. Loue, & B. E. Quill (Eds.), Handbook of rural health (pp. 44–72). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ashton, C. M., Peterson, N. J., Souchek, J., Menke, T. J., Yu, H.-J., Pietz, K., Eigenbrodt, M. L., Barbour, G., Kizer, K. W., & Wray, N. P. (1999). Geographic variations in utilization rates in veterans affairs hospitals and clinics. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(1), 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Department of Health and Human Services. Compressed mortality file summary 1979–1998. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, G. A., Pamuk, E. R., Lynch, J. W., Cohen, R. D., & Balfour, J. L. (1996). Inequality in income and mortality in the US: Analysis of mortality and potential pathways. British Medical Journal, 312, 999–1003.Google Scholar
- Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1999). Income inequality and health: Pathways and mechanisms. Health Services Research, 34(1), 215.Google Scholar
- Lynch, J. W., & Kaplan, G. A. (1997). Understanding how inequality in the distribution of income affects health. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 297–314.Google Scholar
- Rogers, R. G., Hummer, R. A., & Nam, C. B. (2000). Living and dying in the USA: Behavioral, health, and social differentials of adult mortality. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Shi, L., Starfield, B., Kennedy, B., & Kawachi, I. (1999). Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators. The Journal of Family Practice, 48(4), 275–284.Google Scholar
- Siegel, J. S., & Swanson, D. A. (2004). Studies in population: The methods and materials of demography. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, R. G. (1997). Health inequalities: Relative or absolute material standards. British Medical Journal, 314(22), 591–595.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, R. G. (1999). Two pathways, but how much do they diverge? British Medical Journal, 319, 956–957.Google Scholar