Population Research and Policy Review

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 673–694 | Cite as

Trajectories of Public Assistance Receipt among Female High School Dropouts

  • Jenifer Hamil-LukerEmail author


This paper maps patterns of public assistance receipt for 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth female high school dropouts between 1984, when they were 19–27 years old, and 1998 when they reached their early 30s and 40s. Using latent class cluster models, I test whether obtaining a GED, occupational training, work experience, marriage, and delayed parenthood reduce the probability of receiving public assistance. I find that dropouts who earn their GEDs within 4 years after leaving high school have a high probability of never receiving public assistance across the 14-year period. Those who earn GEDs 5 or more years after dropping out have a sharply reduced risk of welfare use in mid-adulthood, suggesting that a late GED may act as a turning point for those formerly reliant on public assistance. Although work experience is the strongest predictor of avoiding public assistance, marriage and education provide a more effective route off of welfare for some recipients. On-the-job training and earning a GED later in life increase the likelihood that chronic recipients will permanently exit welfare. Highlighting the diversity within the welfare population, I conclude that no single approach to ending reliance on public assistance will lead to economic self-sufficiency among the undereducated.


GED Latent class model Welfare trajectories 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandeen-Roche, K., Miglioretti, D.L., Zeger, S.L., Rathouz, P.J. 1997Latent variable regression for multiple discrete outcomesJournal of the American Statistical Association9213751386Google Scholar
  2. Bane, M.J., Ellwood, D.T. 1983The dynamics of dependence: The routes to self-sufficiency. Report prepared for the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Evaluation and Technical Analysis, U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesUrban Systems Research and EngineeringCambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bane, M.J., Ellwood, D.T. 1994Welfare realities: From rhetoric to reformHarvard University PressCambridge MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Blank, R., Schmidt, L. 2001Work, wages, and welfareBlank, R.Haskins, R. eds. The new world of welfareBrookings InstitutionWashington DC70102Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, D. (1997). After AFDC: Welfare-to-work choices and challenges for states. Discussion paper. Manpower Demonstration Research CorporationGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom, D. & Michalopoulos, C. (2001). How welfare and work policies affect employment and income: A synthesis of research. Discussion paper. Manpower Demonstration Research CorporationGoogle Scholar
  7. Boisjoly, J., Harris, K., Duncan, G.J. 1998Initial welfare spells: Trends, events, and durationSocial Science Review72466492Google Scholar
  8. Brandon, P.D. (1993). Trends over time in the educational attainments of single mothers. Discussion Paper No. 1023-93. Institute for Research on PovertyGoogle Scholar
  9. Brock, T., Nelson, L. & Reiter, M. (2002). Readying welfare recipients for work: Lessons from four big cities as they implement welfare reform. Discussion paper. Manpower Demonstration Research CorporationGoogle Scholar
  10. Buck, M.L., Edin, K., Fink, B., Padilla, Y., Ouint, J., Simmons-Hewitt, O. & Valmont, M. (1999). Big cities and welfare reform: Early implementation and ethnographic findings from the project on devolution and urban change. Discussion paper. Manpower Demonstration Research CorporationGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke, V. 2002Welfare reform: TANF trends and dataCongressional Research Service Report for CongressWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Burkett-Sims, C., Duncan, N., Gruenefelder, D., Rabb, J., Rothe, I., Sells, S., Sessoms, A. & Snell, T. (1998). Welfare reform: How will we know if it works? Discussion paper. Welfare Peer Assistance NetworkGoogle Scholar
  13. Cameron, S., Heckman, J. 1993The nonequivalence of high school equivalentsJournal of Labor Economics1141Google Scholar
  14. Cancian, M., Meyer, D.R. 2000Work after welfare: Women’s work effort, occupation, and economic well-beingSocial Work Research246986Google Scholar
  15. Cao, J., Stromsdorfer, E.W., Weeks, G. 1995The human capital effect of general education development certificates on low income womenThe Journal of Human Resources41206228Google Scholar
  16. Caspi, A., Moffitt, T.E., Wright, B.R.E., Silva, P.A. 1998Early failure in the labor market: Childhood and adolescent predictors of unemployment in the transition to adulthoodAmerican Sociological Review63424451Google Scholar
  17. Cherlin, A.J., Fomby, P. 2004Welfare, work, and changes in mothers’ living arrangements in low-income familiesPopulation Research and Policy Review23543565Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, M. 1998Education and training under welfare reformWelfare Information NetworkWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Congressional Record. (1996). Conference report on H.R. 3734, Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996. July 30, pp. H8829-H8958Google Scholar
  20. Danziger, S.K., Seefeldt, K.S. 2002Barriers to employment and the ‘hard to serve’: Implications for services, sanctions, and time limitsFocus227681Google Scholar
  21. Edin, K., Lein, L. 1996Work, welfare, and single mothers’ economic survival strategiesAmerican Sociological Review61253266Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, R.B. 1996Why do so many young American men commit crimes and what might we do about it?Journal of Economic Perspectives102542Google Scholar
  23. Friedman, P. (2001). TANF reauthorization and postsecondary education options for welfare recipients. Discussion paper. The Finance ProjectGoogle Scholar
  24. Gladden, T., Taber, C.R. 2000Wage progression among less skilled workersCard, D.Blank, R. eds. Finding jobs: Work and welfare reformRussell Sage FoundationNew York160192Google Scholar
  25. Grubb, W.N. 1996Learning to work: The case for reintegrating job training and educationRussell Sage FoundationNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamilton, G. 2002Moving people from welfare to work: Lessons from the national evaluation of welfare-to-work strategiesU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, K.M. 1993Work and welfare among single mothers in povertyAmerican Journal of Sociology99317352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris, K.M. 1997Teen mothers and the revolving welfare doorTemple University PressPhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  29. Hofferth, S.L., Stanhope, S., Harris, K.M. 2002Exiting welfare in the 1990s: Did public policy influence recipients’ behavior?Population Research and Policy Review21433472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoffman, S.D., Foster, E.M., Furstenberg, F.F. 1993Reevaluating the costs of teenage childbearingDemography30113Google Scholar
  31. Hotz, V.J., Mullin, C.H., Scholz, J.K. 2002Welfare reform, employment, and advancementFocus225155Google Scholar
  32. Isaacs, J.B. & Lyon, M.R. (2002). A cross-state examination of families leaving welfare: Findings from the ASPE-funded leavers studies. Discussion paper. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  33. Jensen, L., Chitose, Y. 1997Will workfare work? Job availability for welfare recipients in rural and urban AmericaPopulation Research and Policy Review16383395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahn, P., Polakow, V. 2000Struggling to stay in school: Obstacles to post-secondary education under the welfare-to-work regimeUniversity of MichiganFlint MIGoogle Scholar
  35. Klawitter, M., Plotnick, R. & Edwards, M. (1996). Determinants of welfare entry and exit by young women. Discussion Paper No. 1099-96. Institute for Research on PovertyGoogle Scholar
  36. Lichter, D.T., Jayakody, R. 2002Welfare reform: How do we measure success?Annual Review of Sociology28117141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Land, K., McCall, P.L., Nagin, D.S. 1996A comparison of Poisson, negative binomial, and semiparametric mixed Poisson regression models, with empirical applications to criminal careers dataSociological Methods and Research24387442Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, D., Cancian, M. 1998Economic well-being following an exit from AFDCJournal of Marriage and the Family60479492Google Scholar
  39. Mishel, L., Bernstein, J., Schmitt, J. 1999The state of working America 1998–1999ILR PressIthaca NYGoogle Scholar
  40. Moffitt, R. (2003). The role of non-financial factors in exit and entry in the TANF program. Discussion Paper No. 1265-03. Washington DC: Institute for Research on PovertyGoogle Scholar
  41. Murnane, R. & Willett, J. (1993). Do high school dropouts benefit from obtaining a GED: Using multilevel modeling to examine longitudinal evidence from the NLSY. Harvard University Graduate School of EducationGoogle Scholar
  42. National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). The condition of education: 1998. U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research. NCES 98-013Google Scholar
  43. National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Dropout rates in the United States: 2000, NCES 2002-114. U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  44. National Center for Health Statistics. (2003). Health, United States, 2003. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  45. Patel, N. (2001). Workforce development: Employment retention and advancement under TANF. Center for Law and Social PolicyGoogle Scholar
  46. Pavetti, L.A. (1996). The number and characteristics of families who will be potentially affected by policies to time-limit AFDC benefits. Urban InstituteGoogle Scholar
  47. Pavetti, L.A., Acs, G. 2001Moving up, moving out, or going nowhere? A study of employment patterns of young women and the implications for welfare mothersJournal of Policy Analysis and Management20721736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Proctor, B.D., Dalaker, J. 2003Poverty in the United States: 2002U.S. Government Printing OfficeU.S. Census BureauWashington DCCurrent Population Reports P60-222Google Scholar
  49. Rector, R. 2001Using welfare reform to strengthen marriageAmerican Experiment Quarterly46367Google Scholar
  50. Rivera-Batiz, F.L. (1995). The impact of vocational education on racial and ethnic minorities. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban EducationGoogle Scholar
  51. Sandefur, G.D., Cook, S.T. 1998Permanent exits from public assistance: The impact of duration, family, and workSocial Forces77763786Google Scholar
  52. Schwartz, W. (1995). School dropouts: New information about an old problem. ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban EducationGoogle Scholar
  53. Strawn, J., Greenberg, M., Savner, S. 2001Improving employment outcomes under TANFBlank, R.Haskins, R. eds. The new world of welfareBrookings InstitutionWashington DC223244Google Scholar
  54. Vermunt, J.K., Magidson, J. 2000Latent gold user’s guideStatistical InnovationsBelmont MAGoogle Scholar
  55. Wavelet, M., Anderson, J. 2002Promoting self-sufficiency: What we know about sustaining employment and increasing income among welfare recipients and the working poorFocus225662Google Scholar
  56. Yamaguchi, K. 2000Multinomial logit latent-class regression models: An analysis of the predictors of gender-role attitudes among Japanese womenAmerican Journal of Sociology10517021740CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations