Unhollowing rural America? Rural human capital flight and the demographic consequences of the oil and gas boom
The USA has recently experienced an unprecedented boom in domestic, on-shore oil and gas production via unconventional drilling technologies like hydraulic fracturing and directional drilling. Community leaders and policy-makers claim that this boom holds much promise to reverse many social and economic challenges faced by rural, non-amenity counties. Chief among these is human capital flight—often called the “rural brain drain”—and the loss of working-age population. This analysis examines the socio-demographic consequences of the oil and gas boom by assessing if the boom can stall or reverse human capital flight and the loss of working-age population from rural, non-amenity counties. Using a large data set of U.S. counties and difference-in-difference models, we find that the oil and gas boom is associated with modest increases in the proportion of county population with a high school education or less and modest losses in the proportion of county population with a college education. The boom likely increased the proportion of working age population, particularly males 20–34. Overall, our results suggest that oil and gas development has a limited effect on human capital and age composition in non-amenity, rural counties. Broadly, we expect that oil and gas development will do little to address long-run, structural demographic challenges facing rural America.
KeywordsBrain drain Age composition Hydraulic fracturing Fracking Rural development
- Adamson, M. R. (2008). Oil booms and boosterism: Local elites, outside companies, and the growth of Ventura, California. Journal of Urban History, 35(1), 150–177.Google Scholar
- Artz, G. (2003). Rural area brain drain: is it a reality. Choices, 4(1), 1–1.Google Scholar
- Brown, D. L., & Schafft, K. A. (2011). Rural people and communities in the 21st century: resilience and transformation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Brown, D. L., & Swanson, L. E. (Eds.). (2004). Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
- Bryson, A., Dorsett, R., & Purdon, S. (2002). The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labour market policies. Department for Work and Pension, UK. Retrieved 11/14/17 from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/4993/1/The_use_of_propensity_score_matching_in_the_evaluation_of_active_labour_market_policies.pdf.
- Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). (2016). Interactive data. Retrieved 11/14/17 from https://www.bea.gov/itable/index.cfm.
- Carr, P. J., & Kefalas, M. J. (2009). Hollowing out the middle: The rural brain drain and what it means for America. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Carriquiry, M. (2007). US biodiesel production: recent developments and prospects. Iowa Ag Review, 13(2), 8–11.Google Scholar
- Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Colocousis, C. R. (2012). “It was tourism repellent, That’s what we were spraying”: Natural amenities, environmental stigma, and redevelopment in a postindustrial mill town. Sociological Forum, 27(3), 756–776.Google Scholar
- Corbett, M. (2005). Rural education and out-migration: The case of a coastal community. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1 and 2), 52–72.Google Scholar
- Cromartie, J. (2013). Non-metro areas as a whole experience first period of population loss. Accessed 13 July 2017 from https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2013/may/nonmetro-areas-as-a-whole-experience-first-period-of-population-loss/.
- Cromartie, J. (2016). Population and migration. Accessed 13 July 2017 from https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economy-population/population-migration.
- Fry, M., Briggle, A., & Kincaid, J. (2015a). Fracking and environmental (in) justice in a Texas city. Ecological Economics, 117, 97–107.Google Scholar
- Fry, M., Brannstrom, C., & Murphy, T. (2015b). How Dallas became frack free: Hydrocarbon governance under neoliberalism. Environment and Planning A, 47(12), 2591–2608.Google Scholar
- Gallardo, R. (2010). Rural America in the 2000s: age. Southern Rural Development Center and the Daily Yonder.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, R., & Kusmin, L. (2005). Low-skill employment and the changing economy of rural America. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=878342.
- Glenna, L. L., & Cahoy, D. R. (2009). Agribusiness concentration, intellectual property, and the prospects for rural economic benefits from the emerging biofuel economy. Southern rural sociology, 24(2), 111.Google Scholar
- Golden, J. M., & Wiseman, H. J. (2015). The fracking revolution: shale gas as a case study in innovation policy. Emory Law Journal, 64(4), 955–1040.Google Scholar
- Gulliford, A. (1989). Boomtown blues: Colorado oil shale, 1885–1985. Niwot: Univ Pr of Colorado.Google Scholar
- Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46.Google Scholar
- Harvey, R. A., Hayden, J. D., Kamble, P. S., Bouchard, J. R., & Huang, J. C. (2016). A comparison of entropy balance and probability weighting methods to generalize observational cohorts to a population: a simulation and empirical example. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pds.4121/full.
- Jacquet, J. B., & Kay, D. L. (2014). The unconventional boomtown: updating the impact model to fit new spatial and temporal scales. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 9(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
- Jensen, L., McLaughlin, D. K., & Slack, T. (2003). Rural poverty: the persisting challenge. In D. L. Brown, & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (p. 118–131). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, K. M., & Beale, C. L. (2002). Nonmetro recreation counties: their identification and rapid growth. Rural America, 75. Retrieved 11/23/2017 from http://scholars.unh.edu/soc_facpub/75.
- Johnson, K. M., Curtis, K. J., & Egan-Robertson, D. (2017). Frozen in place: net migration in sub-national areas of the United States in the era of the great recession. Population and Development Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12095.
- Krupnick, A. J., Kopp, R. J., Hayes, K., & Roeshot, S. (2014). The natural gas revolution: critical questions for a sustainable energy future. Washington: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
- Malin, S. (2014). There’s no real choice but to sign: Neoliberalization and normalization of hydraulic fracturing on Pennsylvania farmland. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
- McGranahan, D. A., & et al. (1999). Natural amenities drive rural population change. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/33955.html.
- McGranahan, D. A., & Beale, C. L. (2002). Understanding rural population loss. Rural America, 17(4), 2–11.Google Scholar
- Perry, S. L. (2011). Energy consequences and conflicts across the global countryside: North American agricultural perspectives. In: Forum on Public Policy (Vol. 2, pp. 1–23). Retrieved from http://secure.oldhamcounty.com/forumonpublicpolicy/vol2011.no2/archivevol2011.no2/perry.pdf.
- Perry, S. L. (2012b). Environmental reviews and case studies: addressing the societal costs of unconventional oil and gas exploration and production: a framework for evaluating short-term, future, and cumulative risks and uncertainties of hydrofracking. Environmental Practice, 14(4), 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Provasnik, S., KewalRamani, A., Coleman, M. M., Gilbertson, L., Herring, W., & Xie, Q. (2007). Status of Education in Rural America. NCES 2007–040. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 11/14/ 2017 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007040.pdf.
- Saint Onge, J. M., Hunter, L. M., & Boardman, J. D. (2007). Population growth in high-amenity rural areas: Does it bring socioeconomic benefits for long-term residents? Social Science Quarterly, 88(2), 366–381.Google Scholar
- Schafft, K. A., Glenna, L. L., Green, B., & Borlu, Y. (2014). Local impacts of unconventional gas development within Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale region: gauging boomtown development through the perspectives of educational administrators. Society & Natural Resources, 27(4), 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sherman, J., & Sage, R. (2011). Sending off all your good treasures: rural schools, brain-drain, and community survival in the wake of economic collapse. Journal of Research in Rural Education (Online), 26(11), 1.Google Scholar
- United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service (USDA ERS). (2016). County-level data sets. Retrieved 11/14/ 2017 from https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/county-level-data-sets.
- United States Census (US Census). (2017). Dicennial Census. Retrieved 11/14/17 from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census.html.
- Weber, J. G. (2014). A decade of natural gas development: The makings of a resource curse? Resource and Energy Economics, 37, 168–183.Google Scholar
- Weber, J. G., Brown, J. P., & Pender, J. (2013). Rural wealth creation and emerging energy industries: lease and royalty payments to farm households and businesses. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Research Working Papers. Retrieved 11/14/17 from https://www.kansascityfed.org/ONmNT/publicat/reswkpap/pdf/rwp13-07.pdf.
- Zhao, Q., & Percival, D. (2016). Entropy balancing is doubly robust. Working Paper. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/~qyzhao/papers/entropy_balance.pdf.