Advertisement

Population and Environment

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 400–419 | Cite as

Spatial and temporal residential density patterns from 1940 to 2000 in and around the Northern Forest of the Northeastern United States

  • Miranda H. Mockrin
  • Susan I. Stewart
  • Volker C. Radeloff
  • Roger B. Hammer
  • Kenneth M. Johnson
Original Paper

Abstract

Over the past 60 years, housing growth has outpaced population growth in the United States. Conservationists are concerned about the far-reaching environmental impacts of housing development, particularly in rural areas. We use clustering analysis to examine the pattern and distribution of housing development since 1940 in and around the Northern Forest, a heavily forested region with high amenity and recreation use in the Northeastern United States. We find that both proximity to urban areas and an abundance of natural amenities are associated with housing growth at the neighborhood level in this region. In the 1970s, counterurbanization led to higher rates of growth across rural areas. The Northern Forest now has extensive interface between forest vegetation and residential development, which has the potential to profoundly alter the ecological and social benefits of these forests.

Keywords

Housing density Housing growth Sprawl Amenity growth Cluster analysis Northern Forest 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge support for this research by the U.S.D.A. Forest Service and the Northeastern States Research Cooperative. References to software products are provided for information only and do not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or the U.S. Government, as to their suitability, content, usefulness, functioning, completeness, or accuracy.

References

  1. Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Sage University Paper 44, Newbury Park, CA: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, R., Harper, H., & Trust, N. L. (1996). Conservation design for subdivisions: A practical guide to creating open space networks. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bengston, D. N., Fletcher, J. O., & Nelson, K. C. (2004). Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: Policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boone, C. G., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M., Schwarz, K., & Buckley, G. L. (2010). Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: Why the 60 s matter. Urban Ecosystems, 13, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, D. (1995). Inventing New England: Regional tourism in the nineteenth century. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, D. G. (2003). Land use and forest cover on private parcels in the Upper Midwest USA, 1970 to 1990. Landscape Ecology, 18, 777–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, D. L., Fuguitt, G. V., Heaton, T. B., & Waseem, S. (1997). Continuities in size of place preferences in the United States, 1972–1992. Rural Sociology, 62, 408–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, D. G., Johnson, K. M., Loveland, T. R., & Theobald, D. M. (2005). Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecological Applications, 15, 1851–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Housing characteristics: 2000. In J. Woodward, & B. Damon (Eds.), Census 2000 Brief C2KBR/01-13.Google Scholar
  10. Cogbill, C. V., Burk, J., & Motzkin, G. (2002). The forests of presettlement New England, USA: Spatial and compositional patterns based on town proprietor surveys. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 1279–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colocousis, C. (2008). The state of Coos County: Local perspectives on community and change. Issue Brief. Durham, New Hampshire: The Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  12. Drummond, M. A., & Loveland, T. R. (2010). Land-use pressure and a transition to forest-cover loss in the Eastern United States. BioScience, 60, 286–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dupouey, J. L., Dambrine, E., Laffite, J. D., & Moares, C. (2002). Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology, 83, 2978–2984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egan, A., Taggart, D., & Annis, I. (2007). Effects of population pressures on wood procurement and logging opportunities in Northern New England. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 24, 85–90.Google Scholar
  15. Foster, D. R. (1992). Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. Journal of Ecology, 80, 753–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster, D. R. (2002). Thoreau’s country: A historical-ecological perspective on conservation in the New England landscape. Journal of Biogeography, 29, 1537–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foster, D. R., Donahue, B. M., Kittredge, D. B., Lambert, K. F., Hunter, M. L., Hall, B. R., et al. (2010). Wildlands and woodlands: A vision for the New England landscape. Petersham, MA: Harvard Forest, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  18. Fraterrigo, J. M., Turner, M. G., Pearson, S. M., & Dixon, P. (2005). Effects of past land use on spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients in southern Appalachian forests. Ecological Monographs, 75, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fuguitt, G. V. (1985). The nonmetropolitan turnaround. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 180–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuguitt, G. V., & Brown, D. L. (1990). Residential preferences and population redistribution: 1972–1988. Demography, 27, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gavier-Pizarro, G., Radeloff, V., Stewart, S., Huebner, C., & Keuler, N. (2010). Housing is positively associated with invasive exotic plant species richness in New England, USA. Ecological Applications, 20, 1913–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gavier-Pizarro, G., Radeloff, V., Stewart, S. I., Huebner, C., & Keuler, N. Seventy-year legacies of housing and road patterns are related to non-native invasive plant patterns in the forests of the Baraboo Hills, Wisconsin. Ecosystems (in review).Google Scholar
  23. Gonzalez-Abraham, C. E., Radeloff, V. C., Hawbaker, T. J., Hammer, R. B., Stewart, S. I., & Clayton, M. K. (2007). Patterns of houses and habitat loss from 1937 to 1999 in northern Wisconsin, USA. Ecological Applications, 17, 2011–2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon, A. D. (1999). Classification (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  25. Green, D. M., & Baker, M. G. (2003). Urbanization impacts on habitat and bird communities in a Sonoran desert ecosystem. Landscape and Urban Planning, 63, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hagan, J. M., Irland, L. C., & Whitman, A. A. (2005). Changing timberland ownership in the Northern Forest and implications for biodiversity. Report# MCCS-FCP-2005-1. Brunswick, Maine: Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, p. 25.Google Scholar
  27. Hammer, R. B., Stewart, S. I., & Radeloff, V. C. (2009). Demographic trends, the wildland–urban interface, and wildfire management. Society and Natural Resources, 22, 777–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hammer, R. B., Stewart, S. I., Winkler, R. L., Radeloff, V. C., & Voss, P. R. (2004). Characterizing dynamic spatial and temporal residential density patterns from 1940–1990 across the North Central United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen, A. J., Knight, R. L., Marzluff, J. M., Powell, S., Brown, K., Gude, P. H., et al. (2005). Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecological Applications, 15, 1893–1905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heimlich, R. E., & Anderson, W. D. (2001). Development at the urban fringe and beyond: Impacts on agriculture and rural land. Agricultural Economics Reports, 803.Google Scholar
  31. Homer, C. C. H., Yang, L., Wylie, B., & Coan, M. (2004). Development of a 2001 national landcover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 829–840.Google Scholar
  32. Jackson-Smith, D., Jensen, E., & Jennings, B. (2006). Changing land use in the rural intermountain west. In W. A. Kandel & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society (pp. 253–276). The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, K. M. (2008). The changing faces of New England: Increasing spatial and racial diversity. Durham, New Hampshire: The Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire, p. 28.Google Scholar
  34. Johnson, K. M., & Beale, C. L. (2002). Nonmetro recreation Counties: Their identification and rapid growth. Rural America, 17, 12–19.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, K. M., & Cromartie, J. B. (2006). The rural rebound and its aftermath: Changing demographic dynamics and Regional Contrasts. In W. A. Kandel & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society (pp. 25–49). The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, K. M., Nucci, A., & Long, L. (2005). Population trends in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan America: Selective deconcentration and the rural rebound. Population Research and Policy Review, 24, 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data. An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kittredge, D. B. (2005). The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: International examples and potential application in the United States. Forest Policy and Economics, 7, 671–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kluza, D. A., Griffin, C. R., & Degraaf, R. M. (2000). Housing developments in rural New England: Effects on forest birds. Animal Conservation, 3, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lenth, B. A., Knight, R. L., & Gilgert, W. C. (2006). Conservation value of clustered housing developments. Conservation Biology, 20, 1445–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lepczyk, C. A., Mertig, A. G., & Liu, J. (2004). Landowners and cat predation across rural-to-urban landscapes. Biological Conservation, 115, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu, J., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Luck, G. W. (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421, 530–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Long, L., & DeAre, D. (1988). US population redistribution: A perspective on the nonmetropolitan turnaround. The Population and Development Review, 14, 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Longcore, T., & Rich, C. (2004). Ecological light pollution. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lovell, S. T., Mendez, V. E., Erickson, D. L., Nathan, C., & DeSantis, S. (2010). Integrating agroecology and landscape multifunctionality in Vermont: An evolving framework to evaluate the design of agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems, 103, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McDonnell, M. J., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1990). Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: An unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology, 1232–1237.Google Scholar
  47. McKinney, M. L. (2002). Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience, 52, 883–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McWilliams, W. H., Butler, B. J., Caldwell, L. E., Griffith, D. M., Hoppus, M. L., Laustsen, K. M., Lister, A. J., Lister, T. W., Metzler, J. W., & Morin, R. S. (2005). The forests of Maine: 2003, Vol. 188. Resource Bulletin NE-164. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.Google Scholar
  49. McWilliams, W. H., Heath, L. S., Reese, G. C., & Schmidt, T. L. (2000). Forest resources and conditions. In R. A. Mickler, R. A. Birdsey, & J. Hom (Eds.), Responses of northern US forests to environmental change. Ecological studies, Vol. 139 (pp. 3–26). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Milder, J. C., Lassoie, J. P., & Bedford, B. L. (2008). Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem function through limited development: An empirical evaluation. Conservation Biology, 22, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morin, R. S., & Tansey, M. (2008). New Hampshire’s forest resources, 2006. Newtown Square, PA: Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
  52. Nelson, P. B. (2001). Rural restructuring in the American West: Land use, family and class discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nelson, P. B., Nicholson, J. P., & Stege, E. H. (2004). The baby boom and nonmetropolitan population change, 1975–1990. Growth and Change, 35, 525–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Northern Forest Center. (2000). Northern forest wealth index: Exploring a deeper meaning of wealth. Concord, NH: Northern Forest Center.Google Scholar
  55. Northern Forest Center. (2010). Webpage. www.northernforest.org. Accessed 16 September 2010.
  56. Pataki, D. E., Carreiro, M. M., Cherrier, J., Grulke, N. E., Jennings, V., Pincetl, S., et al. (2011). Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: Ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pejchar, L., Morgan, P. M., Caldwell, M. R., Palmer, C., & Daily, G. C. (2007). Evaluating the potential for conservation development: Biophysical, economic, and institutional perspectives. Conservation Biology, 21, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pfeffer, M. J., & Lapping, M. B. (1994). Farmland preservation, development rights and the theory of the growth machine: The views of planners. Journal of Rural Studies, 10, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pidgeon, A. M., Radeloff, V. C., Flather, C. H., Lepczyk, C. A., Clayton, M. K., Hawbaker, T. J., et al. (2007). Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA. Ecological Applications, 17, 1989–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  61. Radeloff, V. C., Hammer, R. B., & Stewart, S. I. (2005a). Rural and suburban sprawl in the US Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and its relation to forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology, 19, 793–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Radeloff, V. C., Hammer, R. B., Stewart, S. I., Fried, J. S., Holcomb, S. S., & McKeefry, J. F. (2005b). The wildland-urban interface in the United States. Ecological Applications, 15, 799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Radeloff, V. C., Stewart, S. I., Hawbaker, T. J., Gimmi, U., Pidgeon, A. M., Flather, C. H., et al. (2010). Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Redman, C. L., & Jones, N. S. (2005). The environmental, social, and health dimensions of urban expansion. Population and Environment, 26, 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rhemtulla, J. M., Mladenoff, D. J., & Clayton, M. K. (2009). Legacies of historical land use on regional forest composition and structure in Wisconsin, USA (mid-1800s–1930s–2000s). Ecological Applications, 19, 1061–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schuler, A., & Ince, P. (2005). Global trade in forest products: implications for the forest products industry and timber resources in New England. In L. S. Kenefic, & M. J. Twery (Eds.), Proceedings of the New England society of American foresters 85th winter meeting. 2005 March 1618 (p. 24). General Technical Report NE-325. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.Google Scholar
  67. Stewart, S. I. (2002). Amenity migration. In K. Luft, & S. MacDonald, (Eds.), Trends 2000: Shaping the future. 5th Outdoor recreation & tourism trends symposium (pp. 369–378). Lansing, MI: Department of park, recreation and tourismresources.Google Scholar
  68. Stewart, S. I., & Johnson, K. M. (2007). Demographic trends in national forest, recreational, retirement, and amenity areas. In L. E. Kruger & R. Mazza (Eds.), Proceedings: National workshop on recreation research and management (pp. 187–201). Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.Google Scholar
  69. Stewart, S. I., Radeloff, V. C., & Hammer, R. B. (2003). The wildland urban interface in US metropolitan areas. In C. Kollin (Ed.), Engineering green: Proceedings of the 11th National Urban Forest Conference.Google Scholar
  70. Syphard, A. D., Stewart, S. I., McKeefry, J., Hammer, R. B., Fried, J. S., Holcomb, S. S., et al. (2009). Assessing housing growth when census boundaries change. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23, 859–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Theobald, D. M. (2001). Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geographical Review, 91, 544–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Theobald, D. M., Miller, J. R., & Hobbs, N. T. (1997). Estimating the cumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat. Landscape and Urban Planning, 39, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Warner, M. E., Hinrichs, C. C., Schneyer, J., & Joyce, L. (1999). Organizing communities to sustain rural landscapes: Lessons from New York. Journal of the Community Development Society, 30, 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA)  2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miranda H. Mockrin
    • 1
  • Susan I. Stewart
    • 2
  • Volker C. Radeloff
    • 3
  • Roger B. Hammer
    • 4
  • Kenneth M. Johnson
    • 5
  1. 1.Rocky Mountain Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Northern Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceEvanstonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Forest Ecology and ManagementUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  4. 4.Department of SociologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  5. 5.Carsey Institute and Department of SociologyUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations