Population and Environment

, Volume 32, Issue 2–3, pp 137–176 | Cite as

Drivers of rural exodus from Amazonian headwaters

  • Luke Parry
  • Brett Day
  • Silvana Amaral
  • Carlos A. Peres
Original Paper

Abstract

Rural–urban migration can have both positive and negative environmental consequences for tropical forests. Rural residents exert pressure on the environment through farming, fishing, and forest extraction, yet conversely, protecting rural livelihoods is often the motivation for conserving large areas of threatened forest. This research examines rural settlement within the Brazilian Amazon to shed light on the drivers of on-going rural exodus and its environmental implications. Specifically, we examine the relative importance of public service provision and natural resources in determining settlement patterns along, and rural–urban migration from, eight rivers in road-less regions of the Brazilian Amazon. Data include biophysical, social, and economic variables that were assessed in 184 riverine settlements along rural–urban gradients up to 740 km from the nearest urban center. Settlements were smaller upstream, and lacked key services such as schools and healthcare. We found that clustering of rural populations close to urban centers reflects the high costs of living in remote areas, despite abundant natural resources which previously justified migration to headwaters. Impeded dry-season navigability and transport costs restricted the flow of goods and services to and from remote areas, and transaction costs of trade exchange were higher upstream. A lack of school access was the main motivation for rural–urban migration and the abandonment of remote riverine settlements. A key policy implication is that while education services could provide a powerful tool to stabilize and support rural populations, delivery is challenging in remote areas and may also encourage further rural–urban migration in the longer term. Furthermore, river-dwellers in remote areas rarely visited remote urban centers, presumably because these journeys are too costly. We examine the implications of our findings for anti-poverty subsidies and payment for ecosystem services and conclude that transport costs required to receive payment could encourage further depopulation of remote areas.

Keywords

Brazil Migration Riverine Rural settlement Rural–urban Urbanization 

Supplementary material

11111_2010_127_MOESM1_ESM.doc (264 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 265 kb)

References

  1. Aide, T. M., & Grau, H. R. (2004). Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems. Science, 305, 1915–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldaz-Carroll, E., & Moran, R. (2001). Escaping the poverty trap in Latin America: The role of family actors. Cuadernos de economía, 38, 155–190.Google Scholar
  3. Alencar, E. F. (2005). Políticas públicas e (in)sustentabilidade social: o caso de comunidades da várzea do Alto Solimões, Amazonas. In D. Lima (Ed.), Diversidade socioambiental nas várzeas dos Rios Amazonas e Solimões: perspectivas para o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade (pp. 59–99). Manaus, Brazil: ProVárzea/Ibama.Google Scholar
  4. Alexiades, M. N. (Ed.). (2009). Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia: Contemporary ethnoecological perspectives. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  5. Almeida, M. W. B. (1996). Household extractive economies. In M. R. Pérez & J. E. M. Arnold (Eds.), Current issues in non-timber forest products research (pp. 119–141). Bogor: CIFOR.Google Scholar
  6. Bezemer, D., & Headey, D. (2008). Agriculture, development, and urban bias. World Development, 36, 1342–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilsborrow, R. E. (1987). Population pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: A conceptual framework and recent evidence. World Development, 15(2), 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilsborrow, R. E. (2002). Migration, population change, and the rural environment. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 8, 69–94.Google Scholar
  9. Börner, J., Mendoza, A., & Vosti, S. A. (2007). Ecosystem services, agriculture, and rural poverty in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon: Interrelationships and policy prescriptions. Ecological Economics, 64, 356–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyle, P. (2004). Population geography: Migration and inequalities in mortality and morbidity. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 767–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bravo-Ureta, B. E., Quiroga, R. E., & Brea, J. A. (1996). Migration decisions, agrarian structure, and gender: The case of Ecuador. The Journal of Developing Areas, 30, 463–476.Google Scholar
  12. Brondízio, E. S. (2005). Intraregional analysis of land-use change in the Amazon. In E. F. Moran & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Seeing the forest and the trees: Human-environment interactions in forest ecosystems (pp. 223–252). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT.Google Scholar
  13. Brondízio, E. S., & Siqueira, A. D. (1997). From extractivists to forest farmers: Changing concepts of caboclo agroforestry in the Amazon estuary. Research in Economic Anthropology, 18, 234–279.Google Scholar
  14. Browder, J. O. (1995). Redemptive communities: Indigenous knowledge, colonist farming systems, and conservation of tropical forests. Agriculture and Human Values, 12, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Browder, J. O., & Godfrey, B. J. (1997). Rainforest cities: Urbanization, development, and globalization of the Brazilian Amazon. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Campos, M. T., & Nepstad, D. C. (2006). Smallholders, the Amazon’s new conservationists. Conservation Biology, 20, 1553–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cardoso, C. A. S. (2002). Extractive reserves in Brazilian Amazonia: Local resource management and the global political economy. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Carr, D. L. (2008). Migration to the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala: Why place matters. Human Organization, 67, 37–48.Google Scholar
  19. Carr, D. (2009). Population and deforestation: Why rural migration matters. Progress in Human Geography (pp. 1–24).Google Scholar
  20. Castro, E. (2009). Urbanização, pluralidade e singularidades das cidades amazônicas. In E. Castro (Ed.), Cidades na floresta (pp. 11–40). São Paulo: Anablume.Google Scholar
  21. Chomitz, K. M. (2004). Nicaragua economic geography: A snapshot. In Nicaragua: Drivers of sustainable rural growth and poverty reduction in Central America (Vol. II). Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  22. Chomitz, K. M. (2007). At loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical forests (p. 284). Wold Bank policy report, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Chomitz, K. M., Setiadi, G., Azwar, A., & Ismail, N. W. (1998). What do doctors want? Two empirical analyses of Indonesian physicians’ preferences regarding service in rural and remote areas. Policy Working Paper Series 1888, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Chomitz, K. M., & Thomas, T. S. (2003). Determinants of land use in Amazonia: A fine-scale spatial analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85, 1016–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clay, J. W., & Clement, C. R. (1993). Selected species and strategies to enhance income generation from Amazonian forests. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  26. Curran, S. (2002). Migration, social capital, and the environment: considering migrant selectivity and networks in relation to coastal ecosystems. Population and Development Review, 28, 89–125.Google Scholar
  27. de Jong, G. F., & Gardner, R. W. (1981). Migration decision making: multidisciplinary approaches to microlevel studies in developed and developing countries. In G. F. De Jong & R. W. Gardner (Eds.), Studies in developed and developing countries. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  28. de Jong, G. F., Johnson, A. G., & Richter, K. (1996). Determinants of migration values and expectations in rural Thailand. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 5, 399–416.Google Scholar
  29. de Jong, W., Tuck-Po, L., & Ken-ichi, A. (2006). The social ecology of tropical forests: Migration, populations and frontiers. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
  30. de Sherbinin, A., VanWey, L. K., McSweeney, K., Aggarwal, R., Barbieri, A., Henry, S., et al. (2008). Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dean, W. (1987). Brazil and the struggle for rubber. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Denevan, W. D. (1996). A bluff model of riverine settlement in Prehistoric Amazonia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86, 654–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ellis, F. (2005). Small farms, livelihood diversification, and rural-urban transitions: strategic issues in Sub-Saharan Africa. Paper presented at the future of small farms, Wye College, London, June 26–29.Google Scholar
  35. Fearnside, P. M. (1989). Extractive reserves in Brazilian Amazonia. BioScience, 39, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fearnside, P. M. (2001). Land-tenure issues as factors in environmental destruction in Brazilian Amazonia: the case of southern Pará. World Development, 29, 1361–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fearnside, P. M. (2002). Avança Brasil: Environmental and social consequences of Brazil’s planned infrastructure in Amazonia. Environmental Management, 90, 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fearnside, P. M. (2008a). The roles and movements of actors in the deforestation of Brazilian Amazonia. Ecology and Society, 13, 23.Google Scholar
  39. Fearnside, P. M. (2008b). Will urbanization cause deforested areas to be abandoned in Brazilian Amazonia? Environmental Conservation, 35, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fearnside, P., & de Alencastro Graça, P. M. L. (2006). BR-319: Brazil’s Manaus-Porto Velho highway and the potential impact of linking the arc of deforestation to central Amazonia. Environmental Management, 38, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fenley, C. A., Machado, W. V., & Fernandes, E. (2007). Air transport and sustainability: Lessons from Amazonas. Applied Geography, 27(2), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Finer, M., Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L., Keane, B., & Ross, C. (2008). Oil and gas projects in the western Amazon: Threats to wilderness, biodiversity, and indigenous peoples. PLoS One, 3, e2932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2003). Consultation on agricultural commodity prices problems (p. 179). Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Commodities and Trade Division, Rome.Google Scholar
  44. Foresta, R. A. (1992). Amazonia and the politics of geopolitics. Geographical Review, 82, 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fundação Nacional do Índio (FUNAI). (2007). Personal communication with C.A. Peres.Google Scholar
  46. Gross, D. R. (1975). Protein capture and cultural development in the Amazon basin. American Anthropologist, 77, 526–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Guedes, G., Costa, S., & Brondízio, E. (2009). Revisiting the hierarchy of urban areas in the Brazilian Amazon: A multilevel approach. Population and Environment, 30, 159–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hall, A. (2008a). Brazil’s Bolsa Família: A double-edged sword? Development and Change, 39, 799–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hall, A. (2008b). Paying for environmental services: The case of Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of International Development, 20, 965–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harris, M. (2000). Life on the Amazon: The anthropology of a Brazilian peasant village. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Harris, J. R., & Todaro, M. P. (1970). Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis. The American Economic Review, 60, 126–142.Google Scholar
  52. Harvey, C. A., Komar, O., Chazdon, R., Ferguson, B. G., Finegan, B., Griffith, D. M., et al. (2008). Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conservation Biology, 22, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Henkel, K. (1994). Agrarstrukturwandel und Migration im ostlichen Amazonien (Para, Brasilien). In Geographisches Institut (p. 474). Tubingen: Universitat Tubingen.Google Scholar
  54. Hess, L. L., Melack, J., Novo, E. M. L. M., Barbosa, C. C. F., & Gastil, M. (2003). Dual-season mapping of wetland inundation and vegetation for the central Amazon basin. Remote Sensing of Environment, 87, 404–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hiraoka, M. (1992). Caboclo and ribereño resource management in Amazonia–a review. In K. H. Redford & C. Padoch (Eds.), Conservation of neotropical forests: Working from traditional resource use. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hutton, T., Mardle, S., Pascoe, S., & Clark, R. A. (2004). Modelling fishing location choice within mixed fisheries: English North Sea beam trawlers in 2000 and 2001. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61, 1443–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografía e Estatística (IBGE). (2007). Contagem populacional de 2007.Google Scholar
  58. Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa Espaçais (INPE). (2008). Projeto prodes: monitoramento da floresta amazônica brasileira por satélite, Sao José dos Campos, Brazil.Google Scholar
  59. Jensen, A. (2009). Valuation of non-timber forest products value chains. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(1), 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kleiner, R. J., Sorensen, T., Stefan, O., Torbjorn, M. D., & Drews, D. (1986). International migration and internal migration: A comprehensive theoretical approach. In I. A. Glazier & L. de Rosa (Eds.), Migration across time and nations: Population mobility in historical contexts (pp. 305–317). London: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
  61. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lima, D. (2004). “The roça legacy” land use and kinship dynamics in the Noguiera, an Amazonian community of the middle Solimões region. In S. Nugent & M. Harris (Eds.), Some other Amazonians: Perspectives on modern Amazonia (pp. 12–36). London: Institute for the Study of the Americas.Google Scholar
  63. Lima, D., & Pozzobon, J. (2009). Amazônia socioambiental–sustentabilidade ecológica e diversidade social. In I. C. G. Vieira, J. M. C. da Silva, D. C. Oren, & M. A. D’Incao (Eds.), Diversidade biológica e cultural da Amazônia (pp. 195–252). Belém: Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi.Google Scholar
  64. Little, P. E. (2001). Amazonia: Territorial struggles on perennial frontiers. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Lu, M. (1999). Do people move when they say they will? Inconsistencies in individual migration behavior. Population and Environment, 20, 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lynch, K. (2005). Rural-urban interaction in the developing world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Massey, D. S. (1990). Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index, 56, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19, 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometrics applications (pp. 198–272). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. McGrath, D. A. (1989). The Paraense traders -small-scale, long distance trade in the Brazilian Amazon. In Geography. University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  71. McGrath, D. (2004). Regatão and caboclo: Itinerant traders and smallholder resistance in the Brazilian Amazon. In S. Nugent & M. Harris (Eds.), Some other Amazonians: Perspectives on modern Amazonia (pp. 178–192). London: Institute for the Study of the Americas.Google Scholar
  72. Moran, E. (1983). Government-directed settlement in the 1970s: An assessment of Transamazon Highway colonization. In M. Schmink & C. H. Wood (Eds.), Frontier expansion in Amazonia. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
  73. Nepstad, D., Schwartzman, S., Bamberger, B., Santilli, M., Ray, D., Schlesinger, P., et al. (2006). Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology, 20, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Neves, D. P. (2005). Os agricultores de várzea no Médio Solimões: condições socioambientais de vida. In D. Lima (Ed.), Diversidade socioambiental nas várzeas dos Rios Amazonas e Solimões: perspectivas para o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade (pp. 101–156). Manaus: ProVárzea/Ibama.Google Scholar
  75. O’Dwyer, G. O. (2005). A construção da várzea como problema social na região do Baixo Amazonas. In D. Lima (Ed.), Diversidade socioambiental nas várzeas dos Rios Amazonas e Solimões: perspectivas para o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade (pp. 207–264). Manaus, Brazil: ProVárzea/Ibama.Google Scholar
  76. Oglethorpe, J., Ericson, J., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Edmond, J. (2007). People on the move: Reducing the impacts of human migration on biodiversity (p. 93). Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund and Conservation International Foundation.Google Scholar
  77. Padoch, C., Brondízio, E., Costa, S., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., Sears, R. R., & Siqueira, A. (2008). Urban forest and rural cities: Multi-sited households, consumption patterns, and forest resources in Amazonia. Ecology and Society, 13, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss12/art12/.
  78. Pantoja, M. C. (2005). A várzea do Médio Amazonas e a sustentabilidade de um modo de vida. In D. Lima (Ed.), Diversidade socioambiental nas várzeas dos Rios Amazonas e Solimões: Perspectivas para o desenvolvimento da sustentabilidade (pp. 157–205). Manaus, Brazil: ProVárzea.Google Scholar
  79. Parker, E. P. (Ed.). (1985). The Amazon caboclo: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Williamsburg, VA: College of William and Mary, Department of Anthropology.Google Scholar
  80. Parry, L. (2009). Spatial changes in Amazonian non-timber resource use. Norwich: University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
  81. Parry, L., Peres, C. A., Day, B., & Amaral, S. (2010). Rural-urban migration brings conservation threats and opportunities to Amazonian watersheds. Conservation Letters, 3, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Perz, S. G. (2002). Household life cycles and secondary forest cover among small farm colonists in the Amazon. World Development, 30(6), 1009–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Perz, S. G. (2006). Migrant characteristics and land-use/land-cover change in the Pan-Amazon Basin: A comparative analysis of Brazil, Bolivia, Ecuador and Perú. In W. De Jong, L. Tuck-Po, & A. Ken-ichi (Eds.), The social ecology of tropical forests: Migration, population and frontiers. Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Perz, S. G., Aramburú, C., & Bremner, J. (2005). Population, land use and deforestation in the Pan Amazon Basin: A Comparison of Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Perú and Venezuela. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7(1), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Perz, S., Walker, R., & Caldas, M. (2006). Beyond population and environment: Household demographic life cycles and land use allocation among small farms in the Amazon. Human Ecology, 34(6), 829–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Phillips, O. (1993). The potential for harvesting fruits in tropical rainforests: New data from Amazonian Peru. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2, 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pinedo-Vasquez, M., & Padoch, C. (2009). Urban, rural and in-between: Multi-sited households mobility and resource management in the Amazon flood plain. In M. N. Alexiades (Ed.), Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia: Contemporary ethnoecological perspectives (pp. 86–96). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  88. Ravenstein, E. G. (1889). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52, 241–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rhoda, R. (1983). Rural development and urban migration: Can we keep them down on the farm? International Migration Review, 17, 34–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rodrigues, A. S. L., Ewers, R. M., Parry, L., Souza, C., Jr., Verissimo, A., & Balmford, A. (2009). Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science, 324, 1435–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rudel, T. K., Coomes, O. T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., et al. (2005). Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change Part A, 15, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sawyer, D. (1987). Urbanização da fronteira agrícola no Brasil. In L. Lavinas (Ed.), Urbanização da fronteira (pp. 43–57). Rio de Janeiro: Publipur, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  93. Shanley, P., Luz, L., & Swingland, I. R. (2002). The faint promise of a distant market: A survey of Belem’s trade in non-timber forest products. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Smith, N. J. H. (1978). Human exploitation of terra firme fauna in Amazonia. Ciência e Cultura, 30, 17–23.Google Scholar
  95. Snrech, S. (1996). Etats des reflexions sur les transformations de l’agriculture dans le Sahel. Paris: Clube du Sahel/OCDE.Google Scholar
  96. Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2007). Avaliando o impacto do programa Bolsa Família: Uma comparação com programas de transferência condicionada de renda de outros paises. IPC evaluation note. Brasília: International Poverty Centre.Google Scholar
  97. Stark, O. (1991). The migration of labor. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  98. Steward, A. (2007). Nobody farms here anymore: Livelihood diversification in the Amazonian community of Carvão, a historical perspective. Agriculture and Human Values, 24, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stoian, D. (2000). Variations and dynamics of extractive economies: The rural-urban nexus of non-timber forest use in the Bolivian Amazon. In Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät. Freiburg im Breisgau: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.Google Scholar
  100. Stoian, D. (2005). Making the best of two worlds: Rural and peri-urban livelihood options sustained by nontimber forest products from the Bolivian Amazon. World Development, 33, 1473–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stoian, D., & Henkemans, A. B. (2000). Between extractivism and peasant agriculture: Differentiation of rural settlements in the Bolivian Amazon. International Tree Crops Journal, 10, 299–319.Google Scholar
  102. Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labour migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. American Economic Review, 59, 138–148.Google Scholar
  103. Torres, H., Bichir, R., & Carpim, T. (2006). Uma pobreza diferente? Novos Estudos, 74, 17–22.Google Scholar
  104. United Nations (UN). (2005). World urbanization prospects: The 2005 revision. Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  105. Vandermeer, J., & Perfecto, I. (2007). Tropical conservation and grassroots social movements: Ecological theory and social justice. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 88, 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Viana, V., & Campos, M. T. (2007). Bolsa floresta: Recompensa para quem conserva a floresta em pé. Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil: Secretaria do Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável (SDS).Google Scholar
  107. von Thunen, J. H. (1826). Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalokonomie, Part I. Hamburg: Pethes.Google Scholar
  108. Walker, R., Moran, E., & Anselin, L. (2000). Deforestation and cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: External capital and household processes. World Development, 28, 683–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Winklerprins, A. (2002). Seasonal floodplain-upland migration along the lower Amazon River. Geographical Review, 92, 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wolpert, J. (1965). Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate. Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 15, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. World Bank. (2003). Rural poverty alleviation in Brazil: Toward an integrated strategy. Washington, D.C: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  112. Wratten, E. (1995). Conceptualizing urban poverty. Environment and Urbanization, 7, 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wright, S. J., & Muller-Landau, H. C. (2006). The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica, 38, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wunder, S. (1999). Value determinants of plant extractivism in Brazil: An analysis of data from the IBGE agricultural census. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA) Working Paper No. 682.Google Scholar
  115. Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. The Geographical Review, 61, 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luke Parry
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Brett Day
    • 1
  • Silvana Amaral
    • 4
  • Carlos A. Peres
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  2. 2.Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)JakartaIndonesia
  3. 3.Lancaster Environment CentreLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  4. 4.Divisão de Processamento de ImagensInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)1758 São José dos CamposBrazil

Personalised recommendations