Population and Environment

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 318–331 | Cite as

If you build it, will they come? Biofuel plants and demographic trends in the Midwest

Original Paper


The rural United States has suffered long-term population decline over the past several decades, especially in farming communities. In recent years, biofuel production has been argued to hold potential for the revitalization of rural America and in response, many rural communities have eagerly attempted to attract ethanol plants as a local development effort. This study conceptualizes economic revitalization in terms of population dynamics and investigates whether the establishment of a biofuel plant has been associated with changes in population aging, natural increase, and/or migration trends in the West North Central United States, the location of the majority of the nation’s biofuel plants. Using path dependence as a conceptual framework and aggregate statistics from a variety of sources, results from spatial regression models indicate that despite initial expectations, ethanol plants have no association with the demographic trajectories of rural counties.


Migration Environment Biofuels Community Development 


  1. Anselin, L. (2005). Exploring Spatial Data with Geoda: A Workbook. Center for Spatially Integrated Social Sciences. Retrieved January 15, 2009. http://www.csiss.org/clearinghouse/GeoDa/geodaworkbook.pdf.
  2. Broadway, M., & Stull, D. (2006). Meat processing and Garden City, KS: Boom and bust. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(1), 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R. B., Dorius, S. F., & Krannich, R. S. (2005). The boom-bust-recovery cycle: Dynamics of change in community satisfaction and social integration in Delta, Utah. Rural Sociology, 70(1), 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, D., & Glasgow, N. (2008). Rural Retirement Migration. Dodrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(3), 332–337.Google Scholar
  6. Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gartland, M. P. (2005). Interdisciplinary Views of Sub-optimal Outcomes: Path Dependence in the Social and Management Sciences. Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(4), 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hipple, Patricia (2007). The Human and Social Dimensions of a Bioeconomy: Implications for Rural People and Places, USDA CSREES.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, K., & Beale, C. (2002). Nonmetro recreation counties. Their identification and rapid growth. Rural America, 17(4), 12–19.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, K., & Rathge, R. (2006). Agriculture dependence and changing population in the Great Plains. In W. Kandel & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society (pp. 197–218). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lobao, L., Hooks, G., & Tickamyer, A. R. (2007). The sociology of spatial inequality. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lobao, L., & Meyer, K. (2001). The great agricultural transition: Crisis, change and social consequences of twentieth century US farming. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Low, S. A., & Isserman, A. M. (2009). Ethanol and the local economy: Industry trends, location factors, economic impacts, and risks. Economic Development Quarterly, 23(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pimentel, D., Marklein, A., Toth, M. A., Karpoff, M. N., Paul, G. S., McCormack, R., et al. (2009). Food versus biofuels: Environmental and economic costs. Human Ecology, 37(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rathge, R., & Highman, P. (1996). Population change in the Great Plains. A history of prolonged decline. Rural Development Perspectives, 13(1), 19–25.Google Scholar
  18. Schlosser, J., Leatherman, J., & Peterson, J. (2008). Are biofuels revitalizing rural economies? Projected versus actual labor market impacts in the Great Plains. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, July 27–29 1, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., et al. (2008). Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319(5867), 1238–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Urbanchuk, J. M., & Kapell, J. (2002). Ethanol and the local community. Working paper. AUS Consultants/SJH & Company.Google Scholar
  21. Ward, M. D., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2008). Spatial regression models. Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences (155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. White, K. C. (2008). Population change and farm dependence: Temporal and spatial variation in the US Great Plains, 1900–2000. Demography, 45(2), 363–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social WorkKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations