Advertisement

Population and Environment

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 222–246 | Cite as

The population, agriculture, and environment nexus in Latin America: country-level evidence from the latter half of the twentieth century

  • David L. CarrEmail author
  • Anna Carla Lopez
  • Richard E. Bilsborrow
Original Paper

Abstract

Unprecedented population growth and migration accompanied equally unprecedented land use and land cover change in Latin America during the latter decades of the twentieth century. Country-level data are examined with bivariate statistics to determine relationships between changes in population patterns and land use (agriculture and forest cover) from 1961 to 2001. In South America, large forest areas were eliminated during the period, while exceptionally high rates of forest clearing were ubiquitous in the Central America/Caribbean region. These environmental changes accompanied dissimilar initial population densities and different effects of population change on agriculture. While interacting with a host of political, socio-economic, and geographic processes, it appears that both Malthusian and Boserupian demographic processes were important drivers of deforestation. Given continued, though slowing, population growth, increased urban consumption, and future land use constraints, policy makers face myriad challenges in advancing sustainable agriculture-population dynamics in Latin America.

Keywords

Population Environment Latin America Migration Land use Land cover LUCC Demography Deforestation Agriculture 

References

  1. Aide, T. M., & Grau, H. R. (2004). Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems. Science, 305, 1915–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelsen, A., & Kaimowitz, D. (2001). Introduction: The role of agricultural technologies in tropical deforestation. In A. Angelsen & D. Kaimowitz (Eds.), Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation (pp. 1–18). New York: CABI/CIFOR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbieri, A., & Carr, D. L. (2005). Gender-specific out-migration, deforestation and urbanization in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global and Planetary Change, 47(2–4), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender, W., & Smith, M. (1997). Population, Food, and Nutrition. Population bulletin. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  5. Bilsborrow, R. E. (1987). Population pressures and agricultural development in developing countries: A conceptual framework and recent evidence. World Development, 15(2), 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilsborrow, R. E. (1998). Overview and assessment of the state of knowledge. In R. E. Bilsborrow (Ed.), Migration, urbanization, and development: New directions and issues. New York and Boston: UN Population Fund and Kluwer Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Binswanger, H., & McIntire, J. (1987). Behavioral and material determinants of production relations in land-abundant tropical agriculture. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36(1), 73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boserup, E. (1965). Population and technological change: A study of long-term trends. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carr, D. L. (2002). The role of population change in land use and land cover change in rural Latin America: Uncovering local processes concealed by macro-level data. In Y. Himiyama, M. Hwang, & T. Ichinose (Eds.), Land use changes in comparative perspective. Plymouth, UK: Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Carr, D. L. (2004). Proximate population factors and deforestation in tropical agricultural frontiers. Population and Environment, 25(6), 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carr, D. L. (2005). Population, land use, and deforestation in the Sierra de Lacandón National Park, Petén, Guatemala. The Professional Geographer, 57(2), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carr, D. L. (2006). A tale of two roads: Population, poverty, and politics on the Guatemalan frontier. Geoforum, 37(1), 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carr, D. L. (2008a). Farm households and land use in a core conservation zone of the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala. Human Ecology, 36(2), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carr, D. L. (2008b). Migration to the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala: Why place matters. Human Organization, 67(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  15. Carr, D. L. (2009). Migration and tropical deforestation: Why population matters. Progress in Human Geography, 33(3), 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carr, D. L., Barbieri, A., Pan, W., & Iravani, H. (2006a). Agricultural land use and limits to deforestation in Central America. Chapter 6. In F. Brouwer & B. McCarl (Eds.), Agriculture and climate beyond 2015: A new perspective on future land use patterns (pp. 98–107). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Carr, D. L., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2001). Population and land use/cover change: A regional comparison between Central America and South America. Journal of Geography Education, 43, 7–16.Google Scholar
  18. Carr, D. L., Pan, W. K., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2006b). Declining fertility on the frontier: The Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Environment, 28(1), 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carr, D. L., Suter, L., & Barbieri, A. (2006c). Population links to deforestation. Population and Environment, 27(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, N., Valente, P., & Zlotnick, H. (1998). What do we know about recent trends in urbanization? Migration, urbanization, and development: New directions and issues. Norwell, MA: UNFPA and Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Coale, A. (1973). The demographic transition. International Population Conference, International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Leige.Google Scholar
  22. Cubbage, F. W., Abt, R. C., Dvorak, W. S., & Pacheco G. (1996). World timber supply and prospects: Models, projections, plantations, and implications. Central America and Mexico Coniferous Resource (CAMCORE) Annual Meeting, Bali, Indonesia.Google Scholar
  23. Davis, K. (1963). The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index, 29(4), 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Sherbinin, A., Carr, D. L., Cassels, S., & Jang, L. (2007). Population and natural resources. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32(5), 1–29.Google Scholar
  25. Fearnside, P. M. (2007). Brazil’s Cuiaba-Santarem (BR-163) highway: The environmental cost of paving a soybean corridor through the amazon. Environmental Management, 39(5), 601–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (1995a). Production yearbook. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  27. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (1995b). Forest Resources Assessment 1990: A global synthesis. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  28. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (1997). State of the world’s forests. Oxford, UK: Words and Publications.Google Scholar
  29. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2005). FAO Stat. FAO statistical databases. http://faostat.fao.org/.
  30. Futemma, C., & Brondízio, E. S. (2003). Land reform and land-use changes in the lower Amazon: Implications for agricultural intensification. Human Ecology, 31(3), 369–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2001). What drives tropical deforestation? A meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on sub-national case study evidence (p. 116). Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: LUCC International Project Office.Google Scholar
  32. Godfrey, B., & Browder, J. (2006). Cidades da Floresta: Urbanização, Desenvolvimento, e Globalização da Amazônia Brasileira (p. 384). Manaus: Editora da Universidade Federal do Amazonas.Google Scholar
  33. Grau, H., Aide, T., & Gasparri, N. (2005). Globalization and soybean expansion into semiarid ecosystems of Argentina. Ambio, 34, 265–266.Google Scholar
  34. Hecht, S. B. (2005). Soybeans, development and conservation on the Amazon frontier. Development and Change, 36(2), 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hecht, S., & Cockburn, A. (1990). The fate of the forest. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  36. Hecht, S. B., Kandel, S., Gomes, I., Cuellar, N., & Rosa, H. (2006). Globalization, forest resurgence, and environmental politics in El Salvador. World Development, 34(2), 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mäki, S., Kalliola, R., & Vuorinen, K. (2001). Road construction in the Peruvian Amazon: Process, causes and consequences. Environmental Conservation, 28(3), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malthus, T. R. (1960). On population (first essay on population, 1798, and second essay on population, 1803). New York: Modern Library, for Random House.Google Scholar
  39. Nepstad, D., Alencar, A., Capobianco, J. P., Bishop, J., Moutinho, P., Lefebvre, P., et al. (2001). Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 154(3), 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pan, W. K., Carr, D. L., Barbieri, A., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Suchindran, C. (2007). Forest clearing in the Ecuadorian Amazon: A study of patterns over space and time. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(5–6), 635–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pingali, P., & Binswanger, H. (1988). Population density and farming systems: The changing locus of innovations and technical change. In R. Lee, B. Arthur, A. Kelley, G. Rodgers, & T. Srinivasan (Eds.), Population, food, and rural development. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Roy Chowdhury, R., & Turner II, B. L. (2006). Reconciling agency and structure in empirical analysis: smallholder land use in the Southern Yucatan, Mexico. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rudel, T. K. (1983). Roads, speculators, and colonization in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Human Ecology, 11(4), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rudel, T. K., Bates, D., & Machinguiashi, R. (2002). A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruttan, V. H. (1994). Sustainable agricultural growth. In V. W. Ruttan (Ed.), Agriculture, environment and health: Sustainable development in the 21st century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sader, S. A., Reining, C., et al. (1997). Human migration and agricultural expansion: An impending threat to the Maya Biosphere Reserve. Journal of Forestry, 95(12), 27–32.Google Scholar
  47. Turner II, B. L., Hanham, R. Q., et al. (1977). Population pressure and agricultural intensity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 37(3), 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker, R., Moran, E., et al. (2000). Deforestation and cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: External capital and household processes. World Development, 28(4), 683–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. The Geographical Review, 61, 219–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zimmerer, K. S. (1993). Soil erosion and labor shortages in the Andes with special reference to Bolivia, 1953–91: Implications for conservation-with-development. World Development, 21(10), 1659–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Carr
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anna Carla Lopez
    • 1
  • Richard E. Bilsborrow
    • 2
  1. 1.UC Santa Barbara (UCSB)Santa BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations