Population and Environment

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 93–113 | Cite as

Fertility beyond the frontier: indigenous women, fertility, and reproductive practices in the Ecuadorian Amazon

  • Jason BremnerEmail author
  • Richard Bilsborrow
  • Caryl Feldacker
  • Flora Lu Holt
Original Paper


Recent research suggests that after decades of population decline, indigenous populations of the lowland tropics of Latin America are now experiencing rapid growth. At the same time, conservationists have pronounced indigenous lands as a key to the future of Amazon forests. As such, conservationists should have a good understanding of indigenous demography and impacts on conservation and development. Yet, there is little depth to understanding of these demographic changes and a dearth of quantitative research on the reproductive practices of indigenous populations. This study addresses these gaps through analyses of a household survey of 648 women of reproductive age from five distinct ethnic populations in the Ecuadorian Amazon. We estimate fertility, analyze reproductive intentions and contraceptive use, and determine the unmet need for reproductive health services. The analyses confirm high fertility rates and high levels of unmet need for contraception. With regard to program and policy implications, we conclude by arguing that isolation and cultural barriers present unique challenges to meet the reproductive health needs of these populations. Innovative approaches, such as those merging population–health–environment topics, may be most relevant for meeting these challenges.


Fertility Indigenous Amazon Ecuador 


  1. Alcorn, J. (1993). Indigenous peoples and conservation. Conservation Biology, 7(2), 424–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arias-Valencia, M. (2001). Reproductive behavior of ethnic groups from Antioquia, Colombia. Salud Publica de Mexico, 43(4), 268–278.Google Scholar
  3. Arias-Valencia, M. (2005). Proximal determinants of fertility: Reproductive behavior among Chamibida indigenous women in Antioquia, Colombia. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 21(4), 1087–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bankole, A., & Westoff, C. F. (1998). The consistency and validity of reproductive attitudes: Evidence from Morocco. Journal of Biosocial Science, 30(4), 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand, J., de Salazar, S. G., Mazariegos, L., Salanic, V., Rice, J., & Snow, C. K. (1999). Promoting birthspacing among the Maya-Quiche of Guatemala. International Family Planning Perspectives, 25(4), 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bongaarts, J. (1991). The Kap-gap and the unmet need for contraception. Population and Development Review, 17(2), 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borman, R. (1999). Cofán: Story of the forest people and the outsiders. Cultural Survival Quaterly, 23.2, 48–50.Google Scholar
  8. Bremner, J., & Lu, F. (2006). Common property among indigenous peoples of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Conservation and Society, 4(4), 499–521.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, L., & Sierra, R. (1994). Frontier migration as a multi-stage phenomenon reflecting the interplay of macroforces and local conditions: The Ecuador Amazon. Papers in Regional Science, 73(3), 267–288.Google Scholar
  10. Callegari-Jacques, S. M., Flowers, N. M., Laner, N. F. M., & Salzano, F. M. (2001). Demography and genetics at the tribal level: The Xavante as a test case. Current Anthropology, 42(1), 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carneiro da Cunha, M., & Almeida, M. (2000). Indigenous people, and conservation in the Amazon. Daedalus, 129(2), 315–339.Google Scholar
  12. Carr, D. L., Pan, W. K., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2006). Declining fertility on the frontier: The Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Environment, 28(1), 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CEPAR. (2000). Encuesta demográfica y de salud maternal e infantile. ENDEMAIN III. CEPAR (Centro de estudios sobre población y desarrollo social) and CDC (Centers for Disease Control). Quito, Ecuador. 211 p.Google Scholar
  14. CEPAR. (2004). Encuesta demográfica y de salud maternal e infantile. ENDEMAIN IV. CEPAR (Centro de estudios sobre población y desarrollo social) and CDC (Centers for Disease Control). Quito, Ecuador.Google Scholar
  15. Colchester, M. (2000). Self-determination or environmental determinism for indigenous peoples in tropical forest conservation. Conservation Biology, 14(5), 1370–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D’Agnes, L., & Margoluis, C. (2007). Integrating population health and environment projects (PHE): A programming manual. Washington DC: USAID.Google Scholar
  17. De Broe, S., Hinde, A., Matthews, Z., & Padmadas, S. S. (2005). Diversity in family planning use among ethnic groups in Guatemala. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37(3), 301–317.Google Scholar
  18. DeBroe, S., & Hinde, A. (2006). Diversity in fertility patterns in Guatemala. Population Space and Place, 12(6), 435–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engelman, R., Bremner, J., De Souza, R. M., & Mogelgaard, K. (2006). Indigenous population, fertility, and reproductive intention in the lowland neo-tropics: Response to McSweeney. Conservation Biology, 20(4), 1315–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fearnside, P. M. (2003). Conservation policy in Brazilian Amazonia: Understanding the dilemmas. World Development, 31(5), 757–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flowers, N. (1994). Demographic crisis and recovery: A case study of the Xavante of Pimentel Barbosa. South American Indian Studies, 4, 18–36.Google Scholar
  22. Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. (2002). Underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience, 52(2), 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Godoy, R. (2001). Indians, markets, and rainforests. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gray, C. L., Bilsborrow, R. E., Bremner, J. L., & Lu, F. (2008). Indigenous land use in the Ecuadorian Amazon: A cross-cultural and multilevel analysis. Human Ecology, 36, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greene, M. E., & Crocker, W. H. (1994). Some demographic aspects of the Canela Indians of Brazil. South American Indian Studies, 4, 47–62.Google Scholar
  26. Hern, W. M. (1992). Polygyny and fertility among the shipibo of the Peruvian Amazon. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, 46(1), 53–64.Google Scholar
  27. Hiraoka, M., & Yamamoto, S. (1980). Agricultural development in the Upper Amazon of Ecuador. Geographical Review, 70(4), 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirsch, J. (2008). Catholics using contraceptives: Religion, family planning, and interpretive agency in rural Mexico. Studies in Family Planning, 39(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. INEC. (2001). VI Censo de población y V censo de vivienda, 2001: resultados definitivos. Quito: INEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos).Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy, D. P., & Perz, S. G. (2000). Who are Brazil’s indigenas? Contributions of census data analysis to anthropological demography of indigenous populations. Human Organization, 59(3), 311–324.Google Scholar
  31. Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York, USA: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  32. Kramer, R. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). Preservation paradigms and tropical rain forests. In R. A. Kramer, C. P. van Schaik, & J. Johnson (Eds.), Last stand: Protected areas and the defense of tropical biodiversity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Laurie, N., Andolina, R., & Radcliffe, S. (2005). Ethnodevelopment: Social movements, creating experts and professionalizing indigenous knowledge in Ecuador. Antipode, 37(3), 470–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lu, F. (2007). Integration to the market among indigenous peoples: A cross cultural perspective from the Ecuadorian Amazon. Current Anthropology, 48(4), 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacDonald, T. (1999). Ethnicity and culture amongst New “Neighbors”: the Runa of Ecuador’s Amazon region. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  36. McQuillan, K. (2004). When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review, 30(1), 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McSweeney, K. (2002). A demographic profile of the Tawahka Amerindians of Honduras. Geographical Review, 92(3), 398–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McSweeney, K. (2005). Indigenous population growth in the lowland neotropics: Social science insights for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 19(5), 1375–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McSweeney, K., & Arps, R. (2005). A demographic turnaround: The rapid growth of indigenous populations in lowland Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 40(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McSweeney, K., & Jokisch, B. (2007). Beyond rainforests: Urbanization and emigration among lowland indigenous societies in Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 26(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Metz, B. (2001). Politics, population, and family planning in Guatemala: Ch’orti’ Maya experiences. Human Organization, 60(3), 259–271.Google Scholar
  42. Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C., Brooks, T., Pilgrim, J., Konstant, W., da Fonseca, G., et al. (2003). Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(18), 10309–10313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nepstad, D., Schwartzman, S., Bamberger, B., Santilli, M., Ray, D., Schlesinger, P., et al. (2005). Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and Fire by Parks and Indigenous lands. Conservation Biology, 20(1), 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Oates, J. F. (1999). Myth and reality in the Rain Forest: How Conservation strategies are failing in West Africa. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Oglethorpe, J., Honzak, C., and Margolius, C. (2009). Healthy people, healthy ecosystems: A manual on integrating health and family planning into conservation projects. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. Peres, C. A. (1994). Indigenous reserves and nature conservation in Amazon forests. Conservation Biology, 8, 586–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perreault, T. (2001). Developing identities: Indigenous mobilization, rural livelihoods, and resource access in Ecuadorian Amazonia. Ecumene, 8(4), 381–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perreault, T. (2003). Changing places: Transnational networks, ethnic politics, and community development in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Political Geography, 22(1), 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Perz, S. G., Warren, J., & Kennedy, D. (2008). Contributions of racial-ethnic reclassification and demographic processes to indigenous population resurgence: The case of Brazil. Latin America Research Review, 43(2), 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Picchi, D. (1994). Observations about a central Brazilian indigenous population: The Bakairi. South American Indian Studies, 4, 37–46.Google Scholar
  51. Pichon, F. J. (1992). Agricultural settlement and ecological crisis in the Ecuadorian Amazon frontier: A discussion of the policy environment. Policy Studies Journal, 20(4), 662–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pichón, F. J. (1997). Colonist land-allocation decisions, land use, and deforestation in the Ecuadorian Amazon frontier. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 45(4), 707–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Price, D. (1994). Notes on Nambiquara demography. South American Indian Studies, 4, 63–76.Google Scholar
  54. Redford, K. H., & Stearman, A. M. (1993a). Forest-dwelling native Amazonians and the conservation of biodiversity: Interests in common or collision? Conservation Biology, 42, 412–422.Google Scholar
  55. Redford, K. H., & Stearman, A. M. (1993b). On common ground? Response to Alcorn. Conservation Biology, 7(2), 427–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rival, L. M. (2002). Trekking through history: The Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador. New York, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rudel, T. K., Bates, D., & Machinguiasli, R. (2002). Ecologically noble Amerindians? Cattle, ranching and cash cropping among Shuar and colonists in Ecuador. Latin American Research Review, 37(1), 144–159.Google Scholar
  58. Sabin, P. (1998). Searching for middle ground: Native communities and oil extraction in the Northern and Central Ecuadorian Amazon, 1967–1993. Environmental History, 3(2), 144–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schwartzman, S., & Zimmerman, B. (2005). Conservation alliances with indigenous peoples of the Amazon. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 721–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sierra, R., Rodriguez, F., & Loses, E. (1999). Forest resource use change during early market integration in tropical rain forests: The Huaorani of upper Amazonia. Ecological Economics, 30(1), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, N. (2001). Are indigenous people conservationists? Preliminary results from the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. Rationality and Society, 13(4), 429–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Terborgh, J. (2000). The fate of tropical forests: A matter of stewardship. Conservation Biology, 14(5), 1370–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Terborgh, A., Rosen, J. E., Galvez, R. S., Terceros, W., Bertrand, J. T., & Bull, S. E. (1995). Family planning among indigenous populations in Latin America. International Family Planning Perspectives, 21(4), 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. United Nations Department of Economic, Social Affairs (DESA). (1983). Manual X: Indirect techniques for demographic estimation. Population Studies No. 81. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  65. United Nations Department of Economic, Social Affairs (DESA). (2007). World Population Prospects the 2006 Revision. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  66. Valdivia, G. (2007). “The trial of the century”: Indigenous identities, transnational networks, and petroleum in Ecuador. Alternatives, 32(1), 41–72.Google Scholar
  67. Vickers, W. T. (1994). From opportunism to nascent conservation: The case of the Siona-Secoya. Human Nature-An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective, 5(4), 307–337.Google Scholar
  68. Walsh, S., Messina, J., Crews-Meyer, K., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Pan, W. K. (2002). Characterizing and modeling patterns of deforestation and agricultural extensification in the Ecuadorian Amazon. In S. Walsh & K. Crews-Meyer (Eds.), Linking people, place, and policy: A GIScience approach. Boston, Massachusets: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  69. Werner, D. (1983). Fertility and pacification among the Mekranoti of Central Brazil. Human Ecology, 11(2), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Westoff, C. F., & Bankole, A. (1996). The potential demographic significance of unmet need. International Family Planning Perspectives, 22(1), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wunder, S. (2003). Oil wealth and the fate of the forest: A comparative study of eight tropical countries. New York, USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Yashar, D. J. (1998). Contesting citizenship: Indigenous movements and democracy in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 31(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yashar, D. J. (1999). Democracy, indigenous movements, and the postliberal challenge in Latin America. World Politics, 52(1), 76–104.Google Scholar
  74. Yashar, D. J. (2004). Citizenship and ethnic politics in Latin America. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper. New York, UNDP, 60 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Bremner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard Bilsborrow
    • 2
  • Caryl Feldacker
    • 3
  • Flora Lu Holt
    • 4
  1. 1.Population Reference BureauWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biostatistics, Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Behavior Health Education, Carolina Population CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Department of Latin America and Latino StudiesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations