Advertisement

Population and Environment

, Volume 30, Issue 1–2, pp 3–25 | Cite as

Proximate industrial activity and psychological distress

  • Jason D. Boardman
  • Liam Downey
  • James S. Jackson
  • J. Bryce Merrill
  • Jarron M. Saint Onge
  • David R. Williams
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper examines the role that gender, occupational status, and family status play in moderating the effect of industrial activity on the psychological well-being of nearby residents. Using a unique spatial assessment of industrial activity and an environmental risk/social stressor framework in conjunction with individual-level data from the Detroit Area Study (DAS) and demographic data from the U.S. census, we find that residents of neighborhoods in close proximity to industrial activity report elevated levels of psychological distress compared to residents of neighborhoods removed from this type of activity. These influences are more pronounced among women but gender differences are also contingent upon occupational and family statuses. We show that specific combinations of work and family statuses make persons particularly vulnerable to the influence of this environmental stressor and women are two and a half times more likely than men to have these vulnerable statuses. This study makes an important contribution to the environmental health literature because it reminds researchers of the fundamental influence of social roles when examining the link between environmental risks and mental health.

Keywords

Neighborhood Psychological distress Stress Pollution 

References

  1. Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aneshensel, C. S., & Sucoff, C. A. (1996). The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 37, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baillie, A. J. (2005). Predictive gender and education bias in Kessler’s psychological distress scale (K10). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(9), 743–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum, A., Fleming, I., Israel, A., & O’Keefe, M. K. (1992). Symptoms of chronic stress following a natural disaster and discovery of a human-made hazard. Environment and Behavior, 24(3), 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benyamini, Y., & Idler, E. L. (1999). Community studies reporting association between self-rated health and mortality: Additional studies, 1995 to 1998. Research on Aging, 21, 392–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bevc, C. A., Marshall, B. K., & Steven, P. J. (2007). Environmental justice and toxic exposure: Toward a spatial model of physical health and psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 36(1), 48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1989). Environmental issues as women’s issues: General concerns and local hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 586–593.Google Scholar
  8. Blocker, T. J., & Eckberg, D. L. (1997). Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 841–858.Google Scholar
  9. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Boardman, J. D. (2004). Stress and physical health: The role of neighborhoods as mediating and moderating mechanisms. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 2473–2483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boardman, J. D., Finch, B. K., Ellison, C. G., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. S. (2001). Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bord, R. J., & O’Connor, R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 830–840.Google Scholar
  13. Cairney, J., Veldhuizen, S., Wade, T. J., Kurdyak, P., & Streiner, D. L. (2007). Evaluation of 2 measures of psychological distress screeners for depression in the general population. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(2), 111–120.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, J. M. (1983). Ambient stressors. Environment and Behavior, 15, 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, K. E., & Lee, B. A. (1990). Gender differences in urban neighboring. The Sociological Quarterly, 31, 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, K. E., & Lee, B. A. (1992). Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need, or time? Social Forces, 70, 1077–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clampet-Lundquist, S., & Massey, D. S. (2008). Neighborhood effects on economic self-sufficiency: A reconsideration of the moving to opportunity experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1), 107–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clemens, J., Couper, M. P. & Powers K. (2002). Detroit Area Study 1952–2001: Celebrating 50 Years. Available online at http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/51439/1/00000007.pdf (accessed November 20, 2008).
  19. Cohen, S., & Spacapan, S. (1984). The social psychology of noise. In D. M. Jones & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Noise and society (pp. 221–245). New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, S., & Weinstein, N. (1981). Nonauditory effects of noise on behavior and health. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 36–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Downey, L. (2003). Spatial measurement, geography, and urban racial inequality. Social Forces, 81, 937–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Downey, L., & Van Willigen, M. (2005). Environmental stressors: The mental health impacts of living near industrial activity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 289–305.Google Scholar
  24. Edelstein, M. R. (2004). Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  25. Elliott, S. J., Martin, T. S., Hampson, C., Dunn, J., Eyles, J., Walter, S., et al. (1997). It’s not because you like it any better: Residents’ reappraisal of a landfill site. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ellison, C. G., Boardman, J. D., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. (2001). Religious participation and the life-stress paradigm: Findings from the 1995 Detroit Area Study”. Social Forces, 80, 215–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Entwisle, B. (2007). Putting people into place. Demography, 44(4), 687–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans, G. W., & Kantrowitz, E. (2002). Socioeconomic status and health: The potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Furukawa, T. A., Kessler, R. C., Slade, T., & Andrews, G. (2003). The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian national survey of mental health and well-being. Psychological Medicine, 33, 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geis, K. J., & Ross, C. E. (1998). A new look at urban alienation: The effect of neighborhood disorder on perceived powerlessness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 232–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. George, D., & Southwell, P. (1986). Opinion on the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant: The effects of situation and socialization”. Social Science Quarterly, 67, 722–735.Google Scholar
  32. Glass, T. A., & McAtee, M. J. (2006). Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: Extending horizons, envisioning the future. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1650–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton, L. C. (1985). Concern about toxic wastes: Three demographic predictors. Sociological Perspectives, 28, 463–486.Google Scholar
  34. Hunter, L. (2000). A comparison of the environmental attitudes, concern, and behaviors of native-born and foreign-born U.S. residents. Population and Environment, 21(6), 565–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 38, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kasarda, J. D. (1993). Inner-city concentrated poverty and neighborhood distress: 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate: Fannie Mae, 4, 253–302.Google Scholar
  37. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (Eds.). (2003). Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kazis, R., & Grossman, R. L. (1982). Fear at work: Job blackmail, labor and the environment. New York: Pilgrim Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. -L. T., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in nonspecific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32, 959–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., et al. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kroll-Smith, J. S., & Couch, R. S. (1991). What is a disaster? An ecological-symbolic approach to resolving the definitional debate. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9(3), 355–366.Google Scholar
  42. Kroll-Smith, S., Gunter, V., & Laska, S. (2000). Theoretical stances and environmental debates: Reconciling the physical and the symbolic. The American Sociologist, 31(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Lin, N., & Ensel, W. M. (1989). Life stress and health: Stressors and resources. American Sociological Review, 54, 382–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Link, B. G. & Phelan, J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  47. Marshall, B. K. (2004). Gender, race, and perceived environmental risk: The “White Male” effect in cancer alley, LA. Sociological Spectrum, 24, 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matthies, E., Hoger, R., & Guski, R. (2000). Living on polluted soil: Determinants of stress syndromes. Environment and Behavior, 32(2), 270–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Mohai, P. (1997). Gender differences in the perception of most important environmental problems. Gender & Class, 5, 153–169.Google Scholar
  51. Park, R. E., Burgess, E. W., & McKenzie, R. D. (1925). The city. The Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Robert, S. A. (1999). Socioeconomic position and health: The independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ross, C. E. (2000). Neighborhood disadvantage and adult depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ross, C. E., & Jang, S. Y. (2000). Neighborhood disorder, fear, and mistrust: The buffering role of social ties with neighbors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ross, C. E., Reynolds, J. R., & Geis, K. J. (2000). The contingent meaning of neighborhood stability for residents’ psychological well-being. American Sociological Review, 65, 581–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). The social structure of seeing disorder. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schulz, A. J., & Lempert, L. B. (2004). Being part of the world: Detroit women’s perceptions of health and the social environment. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33, 437–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schulz, A., Williams, D., Israel, B., Becker, A., Parker, E., James, S. A., et al. (2000). Unfair treatment, neighborhood effects, and mental health in the Detroit metropolitan area. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 314–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Slovic, P., Flynn, J., & Gregory, R. (1994). Stigma happens: Social problems in the siting of nuclear waste facilities. Risk Analysis, 14(5), 773–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. US Bureau of the Census. (1981). 1980 census of the population, classified index of industries and occupations. Washington D.C: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  65. Vandermoere, F. (2008). Psychosocial health of residents exposed to soil pollution in a Flemish neighbourhood. Social Science and Medicine, 66(7), 1646–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason D. Boardman
    • 1
  • Liam Downey
    • 1
  • James S. Jackson
    • 2
  • J. Bryce Merrill
    • 3
  • Jarron M. Saint Onge
    • 4
  • David R. Williams
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Population Program, Institute of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyInstitute of Behavioral Science, University of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  4. 4.University of HoustonHoustonUSA
  5. 5.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations