Population and Environment

, Volume 28, Issue 4–5, pp 223–236 | Cite as

Human population as a dynamic factor in environmental degradation

Original Paper

Abstract

The environmental consequences of increasing human population size are dynamic and nonlinear, not passive and linear. The role of feedbacks, thresholds, and synergies in the interaction of population size and the environment are reviewed here, with examples drawn from climate change, acid deposition, land use, soil degradation, and other global and regional environmental issues. The widely-assumed notion that environmental degradation grows in proportion to population size, assuming fixed per capita consumption and fixed modes of production, is shown to be overly optimistic. In particular, feedbacks, thresholds, and synergies generally amplify risk, causing degradation to grow disproportionally faster than growth in population size.

Keywords

Population Feedback Environment Threshold Synergy Climate warming 

References

  1. Daily, G. (Ed.). (1997). Nature’s services. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ehrlich, P., & Holdren, J. (1971). The impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harte, J. (1988). Consider a spherical cow: A course in environmental problem solving. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.Google Scholar
  4. Harte, J. (1993). The green fuse: An ecological Odyssey. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Harte, J. (1996). Feedbacks, thresholds, and synergies in global change: Population as dynamic factor. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, 1069–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harte, J., Holdren, C., Schneider, R., & Shirley, C. (1991). Toxics A to Z: A guide to everyday pollution hazards. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Harte, J., Torn, M., & Jensen, D. (1992). The nature and consequences of indirect linkages between climate change and biological diversity. In R. Peters & T. Lovejoy (Eds.), Global warming and biological diversity (pp. 325–343). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. IPCC (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kinzig, A., & Harte, J. (2000). Implications of endemics-area relationships for estimates of species extinctions. Ecology, 81(12), 3305–3311.Google Scholar
  10. Lashof, D., DeAngelo, B., Saleska, S., & Harte, J. (1997). Terrestrial ecosystem feedbacks to global climate change. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 22, 75–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. L’Vovich, M., & White, G. (1990). Uses and transformations of terrestrial water systems. In B. Turner (Ed.), The Earth as transformed by human action (pp. 235–252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Murray, J. D. (1989). Mathematical biology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Myers, N. (1983). A wealth of wild species. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  14. NRC/NAS (1995). Science and the Endangered Species Act. Committee on Scientific Issues in the Endangered Species Act, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pacala, S., & Socolow, R. (2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Scientific American, 305, 968–972.Google Scholar
  16. Postel, S. (1993). Water and agriculture. In P. Gleick (Ed.), Water in crisis: A guide to the world’s fresh water resources (pp. 56–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Postel, S., Daily, G., & Ehrlich, P. (1996). Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science, 271, 785–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rozanov, B., Targulian, V., & Orlov, D. (1990). Soils. In B. Turner (Ed.), The Earth as transformed by human action (pp. 203–214). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Schlesinger, W. (1991). Biogeochemistry: An analysis of global change. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Shiklomanov, I. A. (1993). World fresh water resources. In P. Gleick (Ed.), Water in crisis: A guide to the world’s fresh water resources (pp. 13–24). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Torn, M., & Harte, J. (2006). Missing feedbacks, asymmetric uncertainties, and the underestimation of future warming. Geophysical Reserch Letters, 33, L10703. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025540M.Google Scholar
  22. Westman, W. (1977). How much are natures services worth? Science, 197, 960–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Energy and Resources Group and ESPMUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations