Population and Environment

, Volume 27, Issue 5–6, pp 445–461 | Cite as

Land Use and Marriage Timing in Nepal

Article

Abstract

I examine the relationship between patterns of land use and marriage timing in the Chitwan Valley, a rural area in south-central Nepal. In this setting, I conceptualize a relevant dimension of land use as the portion of land in each neighborhood devoted to agriculture. Using discrete-time event history models, I examine the relationship between the proportion of land devoted to agriculture and the rate of marriage among 811 never-married individuals aged 15–20 years. Agricultural land has a positive association with marriage rates. As potential intervening mechanisms between agricultural land and marriage rates, I propose nonfamily organizations, school and work activities, and local marriage markets. A portion of the relationship between land and marriage rates appears to be mediated through the accessibility of nonfamily employers. Respondents’ actual employment activities, however, fail to mediate the effects of agricultural land or nonfamily employers. The precise mechanisms linking land use to marriage remain unclear.

Keywords

Marriage Family formation Land use Nepal 

References

  1. Abernethy, V. D. (1999). A darwinian account of the fertility opportunity hypothesis. Population and Environment, 21, 119–148.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  3. An, L., Mertig, A. G., & Liu, J. (2003). Adolescents leaving parental home: Psychosocial correlates and implications for conservation. Population and Environment, 24, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderton, D. L., & Barrett, R. B. (1990). Demographic seasonality and development: The effects of agricultural colonialism in Taiwan, 1906–1942. Demography, 27(3), 397–441.Google Scholar
  5. Awasthi, K. D., Sitaula, B. K., Singh, B. R., & Bajacharaya, R. M. (2002). Land-use change in two Nepalese watersheds: GIS and geomorphometric analysis. Land Degradation & Development, 13, 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axinn, W. G., & Ghimire D. J. (2003). Population and land use: Social change, fertility and the transition to a built environment. Working Paper. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  7. Axinn, W. G., & Yabiku, S. T. (2001). Social change, the social organization of families, and fertility limitation. American Journal of Sociology, 106(5), 1219–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Axinn, W. G., Barber, J. S., & Ghimire, D. J. (1997). The neighborhood history calendar: A data collection method designed for dynamic multilevel modeling. Sociological Methodology, 27, 355–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barber, J. S., Biddlecom, A. E., & Axinn, W. G. (2003). Neighborhood social change and perceptions of environmental degradation. Population and Environment, 25, 77–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barber, J. S., Shivakoti, G. P., Axinn, W. G., & Gajurel, K. (1997). Sampling strategies for rural settings: A detailed example from Chitwan valley family study, Nepal. Nepal Population Journal, 6(5), 193–203.Google Scholar
  11. Barber, J. S., Murphy, S., Axinn, W. G., & Maples, J. (2000). Discrete-time multilevel hazards analysis. Sociological Methodology, 30, 201–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barbieri, A. F. B., & Carr, D. L. (2005). Gender-specific out-migration, deforestation and urbanization in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global and Planetary Change, 47, 99–110.Google Scholar
  13. Basu, K., & Van, P. H. (1998). The economics of child labor. The American Economic Review, 88(3), 412–427.Google Scholar
  14. Bates, D. C., & Rudel, T. K. (2004). Climbing the ‘Agricultural Ladder’: social mobility and motivations for migration in an Ecuadorian colonist community. Rural Sociology, 69(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bentley, G., Goldberg, T., & Jasienska, G. (1993). The fertility of agricultural and non-agricultural traditional societies. Population Studies, 47, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhandari, P. (2004). Relative deprivation and migration in an agricultural setting of Nepal. Population and Environment, 25(5), 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bhat, P. N. M., & Halli, S. S. (1999). Demography of brideprice and dowry: Causes and consequences of the Indian marriage squeeze. Population Studies, 53(2), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition? How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4, 105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. C. (1996). Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boserup, E. (1981). Population and technological change: A study of long-term trends. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  22. Cain, M., & Mozumder, A. B. M. K. A. (1981). Labour market structure and reproductive behavior in rural South Asia (pp. 245–287). In G. Rodgers & G. Standing (Eds.), Child work, poverty and underdevelopment. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  23. Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Carr, D. L. (2004). Proximate population factors and deforestation in tropical agricultural frontiers. Population and Environment, 25(6), 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Clay, D. C., & Johnson, N. E. (1992). Size of farm or size of family: Which comes first? Population Studies, 46, 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, K. (1963). The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index, 29, 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis, K. (1984). Wives and work: The sex role revolution and its consequences. Population and Development Review, 10, 397–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., & Daily, G. C. (1993). Food security, population and environment. Population and Development Review, 19, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ghimire, D. J., Axinn, W. G., Yabiku, S. T., & Thornton, A. (2006). Social change, premarital nonfamily experience and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1181–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guest, A. M. (1981). Social structure and U.S. Inter-State Fertility Differentials in 1900. Demography, 18, 465–486.Google Scholar
  31. Guneratne, A. (1996). The tax man cometh: the impact of revenue collection on subsistence strategies in Chitwan Tharu society. Studies in Nepali History and Society, 1(1), 5–35.Google Scholar
  32. Henry, S., Schoumaker, B., & Beauchemin, C. (2004). The impact of rainfall on the first out-migration: A multi-level event-history analysis in Burkina Faso. Population and Environment, 25, 423–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kent, J. P. (2002). On the decline of marriage in rural Ireland 1851–1911: The role of ecological constraints and/or developing philopatry. Population and Environment, 23, 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landale, N. S. (1989). Agricultural opportunity and marriage: The U.S. at the turn of the century. Demography, 26(2), 203–218.Google Scholar
  35. Landale, N. S., & Tolnay, S. E. (1991). Group differences in economic opportunity and the timing of marriage: Blacks and Whites in the rural south, 1910. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D. K., Kephart G., & Landry, D. J. (1992). Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? American Sociological Review, 57(6), 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lloyd, K. M., & South, S. J. (1996). Contextual influences on young men’s transition to first marriage. Social Forces, 74(3), 1097–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MacDonald, K. (1999). An evolutionary perspective on human fertility. Population and Environment, 21, 223–246.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1978). Manifesto of the communist party. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader (2nd ed., pp. 469–500). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  40. McKenzie, R. D. (1921). The neighborhood: A study of local life in the city of Columbus, Ohio. II. American Journal of Sociology, 27, 344–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Müller-Böker, U. (1999). The Chitwan tharus in Southern Nepal: An ethnoecological approach. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
  42. Pan, W. K. Y., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2005). The use of a multilevel statistical model to analyze factors influencing land use: A study of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global and Planetary Change, 47, 232–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perz, S. G., & Skole, D. L. (2003). Social determinants of secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Science Research, 32, 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Raymo, J. M. (2003). Educational attainment and the transition to first marriage among Japanese women. Demography, 40(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
  46. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Evenson, R. (1977). Fertility, schooling and economic contribution of children in rural India: And econometric analysis. Econometrica, 45(5), 1065–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rindfuss, R. R., Walsh, S. J., Turner, B. L. II, Fox, J., & Mishra, V. (2004). Developing a science of land change: Challenges and methodological issues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(39), 13976–13981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rudel, T. K., Bates, D., & Machinguiashi, R. (2002). A tropical forest transition? Agricultural change, out-migration, and secondary forests in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simmons, C. S., Walker, R. T., Wood, C. H., Arima, E., & Cochrane, M. (2004). Wildfires in Amazonia: A pilot study examining the role of farming systems, social capital, and fire contagion. Journal of Latin American Geography, 3(1), 81–95.Google Scholar
  50. Skole, D. L. (2004). Geography as a great intellectual melting pot and the preeminent interdisciplinary environmental discipline. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 739–743.Google Scholar
  51. Strassmann, B. I., & Clarke, A. L. (1998). Ecological constraints on marriage in rural Ireland. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tambashe, B. O., & Shapiro, D. (1996). Family background and early life course transitions in Kinshasa. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(4), 1029–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thapa, K. K., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Murphy, L. (1996). Deforestation, land use, and women’s agricultural activities in the Ecuadorian Amazon. World Development, 24, 1317–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thornton, A., & Fricke, T. E. (1987). Social change and the family: Comparative perspectives from the West, China, and South Asia. Sociological Forum, 2, 746–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thornton, A., & Lin, H.-S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, J. (1995). The influence of educational experiences on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. VanLandingham, M., & Hirschman, C. (2001). Population pressure and fertility in pre-transition Thailand. Population Studies, 55(3), 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walker, R., Moran, E., & Anselin, L. (2000). Deforestation and cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: External capital and household processes. World Development, 28(4), 683–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilcox, P., Quisenberry, N., & Jones, S. (2003). The built environment and community crime risk interpretation. Journal Of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 322–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yabiku, S. T. (2005). The effect of non-family experiences on age of marriage in a setting of rapid social change. Population Studies, 59(3), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yabiku, S. T. (2004). Marriage timing in Nepal: Organizational effects and individual mechanisms. Social Forces, 83, 559–586.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social and Family DynamicsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations