Population and Environment

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 583–621 | Cite as

Environmental Effects on Family Size Preferences and Subsequent Reproductive Behavior in Nepal

  • Ann E. BiddlecomEmail author
  • William G. Axinn
  • Jennifer S. Barber


This study investigates the relationship between environmental degradation and men and women’s family size preferences and subsequent reproductive behaviors in Nepal. We draw on unique environmental data at the local level, household and individual-level survey data and individuals reproductive behavior over a 3 year time period in Western Chitwan Valley, Nepal. Results from Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and logistic regression models show that poorer environmental quality and greater reliance on publicly owned natural resources are associated with higher family size preferences and higher rates of pregnancy. The analyses provide support for the “vicious circle” argument that environmental degradation can lead to rising population growth via positive effects on fertility. As environmental conditions decline and when households rely on public lands for natural resources, men and women desire larger family sizes and women are more likely to get pregnant in the near future.


Environment fertility Nepal 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acharya, M., Bennett, L. 1981The rural women of Nepal: An Aggregate Analysis and Summary of 8 Village StudiesCentre for Economic Development and AdministrationKathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  2. Amacher, G. S., Hyde, W. F., Kanel, K. R 1996Household fuelwood demand and supply in Nepal’s Tarai and Mid-Hills: Choice between cash outlays and labor opportunityWorld Development2417251736Google Scholar
  3. Amacher, G. S., Hyde, W. F., Kanel, K. R 1999Nepali fuelwood production and consumption: Regional and household distinctions, substitution and successful interventionJournal of Development Studies35138163Google Scholar
  4. Axinn, W. G., Barber, J. S 2001Mass education and fertility transitionAmerican Sociological Review66481505Google Scholar
  5. Axinn, W. G., Ghimire, D. J. (2002). Population and environment:The impact of fertility on land use in an agricultural society. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, May 9–11, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  6. Axinn, W. G., Pearce, L. D., Ghimire, D. J 1999Innovations in life history calendar applicationsSocial Science Research8243264Google Scholar
  7. Axinn, W. G., Yabiku, S. T 2001Social change, the social organization of families, and fertility limitationAmerican Journal of Sociology10612191261Google Scholar
  8. Barber, J. S., Murphy, S., Axinn, W. G., Maples, J 2000Discrete-time multilevel hazard analysisSociological Methodology30201235Google Scholar
  9. Becker, G. S. 1976The Economic Approach to Human BehaviorUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke, P. A 1998Intrahousehold labor allocation responses to environmental goods scarcity:A case study from the hills of NepalEconomic Development and Cultural Change46807830Google Scholar
  11. Coombs, L. C 1974The measurement of family size preferences and subsequent fertilityDemography11587611Google Scholar
  12. Dasgupta, P. 1993An Inquiry into Well-being and DestitutionClarendon PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Filmer, D., Pritchett, L. H 2002Environmental degradation and the demand for children: Searching for the vicious circle in PakistanEnvironment and Development Economics7123146Google Scholar
  14. Foster, A. D., Rosenzweig, M. R 2003Economic growth and the rise of forestsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics118601637Google Scholar
  15. Kent, M., Coker, P. 1992Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical ApproachBelhaven PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar, S., Hotchkiss, D. 1988Consequences of deforestation for women’s time allocation, agricultural production, and nutrition in hill areas of Nepal. Research Report 69International Food Policy InstituteWashington, D.C.Google Scholar
  17. Matthews, S. A., Shivakoti, G. P., Chhetri, N 2000Population forces and environmental change: Observations from Western Chitwan, NepalSociety and Natural Resources13763775Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Health [Nepal], New ERA & ORC Macro2002Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2001.: Family Health Division, Ministry of Health; New ERA; and ORC MacroCalvertonMaryland, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Neill, B. C., MacKellar, F. L., Lutz, W. 2001Population and Climate ChangeIIASALaxenburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  20. Pebley, A. R 1998Demography and the environmentDemography35377390Google Scholar
  21. Rosero-Bixby, L., Palloni, A 1998Population and deforestation in Costa RicaPopulation and Environment20149178Google Scholar
  22. Shivakoti, G. P., Axinn, W. G., Bhandari, P., Chhetri, N. B 1999The impact of community context on land use in an agricultural societyPopulation and Environment20191213Google Scholar
  23. Shrestha S. S., Shrestha S., Biddlecom A. E. (2002). The household registration system Methods and issues in collecting continuous data on demographic events Research Report 02−517. Population Studies Center (PSC), University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann E. Biddlecom
    • 1
    Email author
  • William G. Axinn
    • 2
  • Jennifer S. Barber
    • 2
  1. 1.The Alan Guttmacher InstituteNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations