Advertisement

Contentious Federalism: Sheriffs, State Legislatures, and Political Violence in the American West

  • Zoe NemereverEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite the extensive literature probing individual motivations for committing political violence, little existing academic research directly examines the role of local governments in encouraging political violence. I use a federalism perspective to consider how subnational governments can decrease the perceived costs of high-risk political violence against the state. This paper introduces three novel datasets to substantiate my theories: political violence against Bureau of Land Management employees, land transfer legislation in state legislatures, and a roster of constitutionalist sheriffs. As emblems of the contentious relationship between rural land users and the federal government, employees of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) routinely deal with threats, harassment, and physical violence from civilians who are incensed by restrictions on the use of federal land. Counties with constitutionalist sheriffs are 50%  more likely to have violence against BLM employees than other counties, even when controlling for other factors. Additionally, levels of political violence are higher in years following the passage of land transfer legislation in the state legislature. Elected officials’ legislative activity, campaign promises, and law enforcement decisions all may promote political violence against federal employees. Incorporating federalism into the study of political violence uncovers how the actions of elected officials at the state and county levels can lower the perceived costs of violence against the national government.

Keywords

Political violence Federalism Sheriffs Public land State legislatures 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper would not have been possible without Laura Dumais (Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility) and Tay Wiles (High Country News) who generously shared the political violence incident reports. I thank the three anonymous reviewers and editors, Thad Kousser, Seth Hill, Zoli Hajnal, Dan Butler, Charles McClean, Taylor Carlson, and Luke Sanford for invaluable feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. Replication files are available at  https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/MPLQUI.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aitchison, G. (2018). Domination and disobedience: Protest, coercion and the limits of an appeal to justice. Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 666–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Braun, D., & Hutter, S. (2016). Political trust, extra-representational participation and the openness of political systems. International Political Science Review, 37, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cawley, R. M. (1993). Federal land, western anger: The Sagebrush Rebellion and environmental politics. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chaloupka, W. (1996). The county supremacy and militia movements: Federalism as an issue on the radical right. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 26(3), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke, J. W. (1998). Without fear or shame: Lynching, capital punishment and the subculture of violence in the American South. British Journal of Political Science, 28(2), 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamic of agenda-building (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Paper, 56, 563–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conable, P. (1996). Equal footing, county supremacy, and the western public lands. The National Agricultural Law Review, 26, 1263–1286.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davenport, C. (2009). Media bias, perspective, and state repression: The Black Panther Party. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  13. Eagan, S. P. (1996). From spikes to bombs: The rise of eco-terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 19(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M. (2017). Cities in American federalism: Evidence on state-local government conflict from a survey of mayors. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(4), 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farris, E. M., & Holman, M. R. (2015). Public officials and a “private” matter: Attitudes and policies in the county sheriff office regarding violence against women. Social Science Quarterly, 96(4), 1117–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farris, E. M., & Holman, M. R. (2017). All politics is local? County sheriffs and localized policies of immigration enforcement. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fearon, J., & Laitin, D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gehrke, R. (2016). Utah’s lawsuit over federal lands nearly ready, expenses questioned. The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved June 10, 2016.Google Scholar
  19. Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and influence: Economic inequality and political power in America. New York: Princeton university Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilpin, L. (2016). How an East Coast think tank is fueling the land transfer movement. High Country News. Retrieved February 26, 2016.Google Scholar
  21. Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gutierrez-Sanin, F., & Wood, E. J. (2017). What should we mean by “pattern of political violence”? Repertoire, targeting, frequency, and technique. Perspectives on Politics, 15, 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kincaid, J. (1990). From cooperative to coercive federalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 509(1), 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kincaid, J. (2008). Contemporary U.S. federalism: Coercive change with cooperative continuity. Revista d’Estudis Autonòmics i Federals, 6, 10–36.Google Scholar
  25. Lamm, R. D., & McCarthy, M. (1982). The angry west: A vulnerable land and its future. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  26. Leadingham, S., & Garner, Z. (2018). ‘Bundyville’ tells a story of anti-government extremism set in the rural west, says podcast host. KLCC NPR for Oregonians. Retrieved December 11, 2018.Google Scholar
  27. Lind, D. (2016). Waco and Ruby Ridge: The 1990s standoffs haunting the Oregon takeover. Vox. Retrieved January 5, 2016.Google Scholar
  28. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Maughan, R. (2016). The Malheur occupation and its aftermath. Idaho State Journal. Retrieved April 6, 2016.Google Scholar
  30. McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McVeigh, R. (1999). Structural incentives for conservative mobilization: Power devaluation and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan, 1915–1925. Social Forces, 77, 1461–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller, E. N., & Godwin, R. K. (1984). Democratic and aggressive political participation: Estimation of a nonrecursive model. Political Behavior, 6, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muller, E. N., Seligson, M. A., & Turan, I. (1987). Education, participation, and support for democratic norms. Comparative Politics, 20(1), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Napolio, N. G., & Peterson, J. C. (2018). Their boot in our face no longer: Administrative sectionalism and resistance to federal authority in the U.S. South. State Politics and Policy Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440018803960.Google Scholar
  35. Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  36. O'Donoghue, A. J. (2013). Lawmakers, Utah sheriffs want to rein in renegade BLM, Forest Service officers. Deseret News. Retrieved February 28, 2013.Google Scholar
  37. Olson, A., Callaghan, T., & Karch, A. (2017). Return of the ‘Rightful Remedy’: Partisan federalism, resource availability, and nullification legislation in the American states. Publius: The Journal of Federalism.  https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx061.Google Scholar
  38. Potok, M., & Lenz, R. (2016). Line in the sand. Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved June 13, 2016.Google Scholar
  39. Riverstone-Newell, L. (2017). The rise of state preemption laws in response to local policy innovation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 47(3), 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenstone, S. J. (1982). Economic adversity and voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 26(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  42. Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schnabel, L. (2018). Education and attitudes toward interpersonal and state-sanctioned violence (pp. 505–511). PS: Political Science and Politics.Google Scholar
  44. Schumacher, P. D. (1980). The effectiveness of militant tactics in contemporary urban protest. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 9, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Siegler, K. (2016). Utah sheriffs threaten to arrest rangers if they try to close public lands. National Public Radio. Retrieved May 31, 2016.Google Scholar
  47. Sottile, L. (2017). Cliven Bundy’s fight against the feds has roots in interpretation of Mormon scripture. Washington Post. Retrieved December 7, 2017.Google Scholar
  48. Swearingen, M. (2016). The BLM’s arms race on the range. National Public Radio. Retrieved February 2, 2016.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, P. (2014). Sheriffs are key to BLM mission, but local politics intrude. GreenWire. Retrieved July 17, 2014.Google Scholar
  50. Tsai, R. L. (2017). The troubling sheriffs' movement that Joe Arapaio supports. Politico. Retrieved September 1, 2017.Google Scholar
  51. Van Dyke, N., & Soule, S. A. (2002). Structural social change and the mobilizing effect of threat: Explaining levels of patriot and militia organizing in the United States. Social Problems, 49, 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilson, J. Q. (1961). The strategy of protest: Problems of negro civic action. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 5, 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood, E. (2003). Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wood, A. L. (2011). Lynching and spectacle: Witnessing racial violence in America, 1890–1940. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations