Advertisement

A Healthy Democracy? Evidence of Unequal Representation Across Health Status

  • Julianna PachecoEmail author
  • Christopher Ojeda
Original Paper

Abstract

Research on the link between health and political behavior has flourished, yet there have been no analyses regarding the political consequences of health inequalities. Using data from the 2012 CCES, we find that health is associated with representation. Healthy individuals are better represented compared to unhealthy citizens; this positive association is particularly true for individuals in the top third income group and when citizens are represented by Republicans. We explore two mechanisms that may account for this association. The participatory mechanism suggests that healthy individuals are better represented due to differences in political participation while the preferential mechanism suggests that differences are due to shifts in policy preferences. Overall, we find little evidence that either mechanism fully accounts for the association between health and representation. While the results clearly suggest that political clout is not just about income, but also health, scholars are encouraged to further explain this association.

Keywords

Representation Health Political participation Responsiveness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A previous version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. We thank members of the Rooney Center of Democracy at the University of Notre Dame, the American Politics Group at the University of North Carolina, and the Public Policy Center at the University of Iowa as well as anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. All errors are our own.

Supplementary material

11109_2019_9541_MOESM1_ESM.docx (342 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 342 kb)

References

  1. Achen, C. H. (1978). Measuring representation. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 475–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Political Science Association (APSA). (2004). American in an Age of Rising Inequality. Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy.Google Scholar
  3. Ansolabehere, S., & Jones, P. E. (2010). Constituents’ responses to congressional roll-call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 583–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ansolabehere, S., & Rivers, D. (2013). Cooperative survey research. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 307–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansolabehere, S. & Schaffner, B. (2011). Re-examining the validity of different survey modes for measuring public opinion in the U.S.: Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison. Working paper.Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong, E. M., Carpenter, D. P., & Hojnacki, M. (2006). Whose deaths matter? Mortality, advocacy, and attention to disease in the mass media. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 31(4), 729–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bafumi, J., & Herron, M. C. (2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of american voters and their members of congress. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartels, L. M. (2008). Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bjorner, J. B., Fayers, P. M., & Idler, E. L. (2005). Self-rated health. In P. Fayers & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Boardman, J. D. (2006). Self-Rated Health among U.S. Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bodenheimer, T., Chen, E., & Bennett, H. D. (2009). Confronting the growing burden of chronic disease: Can the US health care workforce do the job? Health Affairs, 28(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burden, B. (2004). Candidate positioning in U.S. congressional elections. British Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burden, B. C., Fletcher, J. M., Herd, P., Jones, B. M., & Moynihan, D. P. (2016). How different forms of health matter to political participation. Journal of Politics, 79(1), 166–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canon, D. T. (1999). Race, redistricting, and representation: The unintended consequences of black majority districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Carpenter, D. (2009). Reputation and power: Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Carpenter, D. (2012). Is health politics different? Annual Review of Political Sciene, 15, 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carpenter, D., Moffitt, S. I., Moore, C. D., Rynbrandt, R. T., Ting, M. M., Yohai, I., et al. (2009). Early entrant protection in approval regulation: Theory and evidence from FDA drug review. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 26(3), 515–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denny, K. J., & Doyle, O. M. (2007). “… Take up thy bed, and vote” Measuring the relationship between voting behaviour and indicators of health. The European Journal of Public Health, 17(4), 400–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy: Public opinion and policy in American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fiorina, M. P. (1974). Representatives, roll calls, and constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  23. Gilens, M. (2013). Affluence and influence. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gollust, S. E. & Wendy, R. (2015). The bodies politic: Chronic health conditions and participatory inequalities. Journal of Health Policy, Politics, and Law 3424450.Google Scholar
  26. Griffin, J. D., & Newman, B. (2005). Are voters better represented? The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1206–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Griffin, J. D., & Newman, B. (2007). The unequal representation of latinos and whites. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1032–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffin, J. D., & Newman, B. (2013). Voting power, policy representation and disparities in voting’s rewards. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Griffin, J. D., Newman, B., & Wolbrecht, C. (2012). A gender gap in policy representation in the US congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 37(1), 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henderson, M., & Hillygus, D. S. (2011). The dynamics of health care opinion, 2008–2010: Partisanship, self-interest, and racial resentment. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 36(6), 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hill, K. Q., & Leighley, J. (1992). The policy consequences of class bias in state electorates. American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hill, K. Q., Jan, E. L., & Angela, H.-A. (1995). Lower-class mobilization and policy linkage in the US states. American Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huisman, M., & Deeg, D. J. (2010). A commentary on Marja Jylhä’s “What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social Science and Medicine, 70(5), 652–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jylhä, M. (2009). What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kousser, T. (2002). Politics, economics, and state policy: Discretionary medicaid spending, 1980–1993. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 27, 639–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lantz, P. M., House, J. S., Lepkowski, J. M., Williams, D. R., Mero, R. P., & Chen, J. (1998). Socioeconomic factors health behaviors and mortality: Results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults. Journal of American Medical Association, 279, 1703–1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Layes, A., Asada, Y., & Kephart, G. (2012). Whiners and deniers—What does self-rated health measure? Social Science and Medicine, 75(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma presidential address, American Political Science Association. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Margalit, Y. (2013). Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the great recession. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin, P. S. (2003). Voting’s rewards: Voter turnout, attentive publics, and congressional allocation of federal money. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mattila, M., Söderlund, P., Wass, H., & Rapeli, L. (2013). Healthy voting: The effect of self-reported health on turnout in 30 countries. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 886–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Michener, J. (2018). Fragmented democracy: Medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in congress. American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ojeda, C. (2015). Depression and political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1226–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ojeda, C. & Pacheco, J. (2017). Health and voting in young adulthood. British Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  48. Osborn, T. (2012). How women represent women: Political parties, representation, and gender in the state legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pacheco, J., & Fletcher, J. (2015). Incorporating health into studies of political behavior: Evidence for turnout and partisanship. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983). Effects of public opinion on policy. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Palloni, A. (2006). Reproducing inequalities: luck, wallets, and the enduring effects of childhood health. Demography, 43(4), 587–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paul-Shaheen, P. A. (1998). The states and health care reform: The road traveled and lessons learned from seven that took the lead. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 23, 319–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Preuhs, R. R. (2006). The conditional effects of minority descriptive representation: Black legislators and policy influence in the American states. Journal of Politics, 68(3), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Richardson, L., & Konisky, D. M. (2013). Personal and collective evaluations of the 2010 health care reform. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 38(5), 921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robert, S. A., & Booske, B. C. (2011). US opinions on health determinants and social policy as health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 1655–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rocha, R. R., & Wringle, R. D. (2011). Gender, ethnicity, and support for bilingual education: Will just any woman or latino do? a contingent, “No”. Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rodriguez, J. M., Bound, J., & Geronimus, A. T. (2014). US infant mortality and the president’s party. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(3), 818–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rosenstone, S. J. (1982). Economic adversity and voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 26(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosenstone, S. J., Hansen, J. M., & Reeves, K. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America.Google Scholar
  61. Ross, M. (2006). Is democracy good for the poor? American Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 860–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schur, L., & Meera, A. (2012). Sidelined or mainstreamed? Political participation and attitudes of people with disabilities in the United States. Social Science Quarterly., 94(3), 811–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schur, L., Shields, T., Kruse, D., & Schriner, K. (2002). Enabling democracy: Disability and voter turnout. Political Research Quarterly, 55(1), 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, J. P. (1999). Healthy bodies and thick wallets: the dual relation between health and economic status. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 144–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Soroka, S. N., & Christopher, W. (2008). On the limits of inequality in representation. PS: Political Science and Politics, 41, 219–327.Google Scholar
  67. Strach, P. (2013). Gender practice as political practice: Cancer, culture, and identity. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(2), 247–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Ward, B. W., Schiller, J. S., & Goodman, R. A. (2014). Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: A 2012 update. Preventing Chronic Disease, 11, E62.  https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.130389.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.The University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations