Abstract
Worries about the instability of political attitudes and lack of ideological constraint among the public are often pacified by the assumption that individuals have stable political values. These political values are assumed to help individuals filter political information and thus both minimize outside influence and guide people through complex political environments. This perspective, though, assumes that political values are stable and consistent across contexts. This piece questions that assumption and argues that political values are socially reinforced—that is, that political values are not internal predispositions, but the result of social influence. I consider this idea with two empirical tests: an experimental test that recreates the transmission of political values and an observational analysis of the effect of politically homogeneous social contexts on political value endorsements. Results suggest that political values are socially reinforced. The broader implication of my findings is that the concepts scholars term “political values” may be reflections of individuals’ social contexts rather than values governing political behavior.
Keywords
Political values Social influence Social cuesNotes
Supplementary material
References
- Bartels, L. M. (2003). Democracy with attitudes. In M. B. MacKuen & G. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Electoral democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Berinsky, A. J. (2004). Can we talk? Self-presentation and the survey response. Political Psychology, 25(4), 643–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berinsky, A. J., & Lavine, H. (2012). Self-monitoring and political attitudes. In J. Aldrich & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Interdisciplinary innovation and the American national election studies (pp. 27–45). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.Google Scholar
- Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2013). Personality approaches to political behavior. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. (2016). Political chameleons: An exploration of conformity in political discussions. Political Behavior, 38, 817–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Caverley, J. D., & Krupnikov, Y. (2017). Aiming at doves: Experimental evidence of military images’ political effects. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(7), 1482–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chong, D. (2000). Rational lives: Norms and values in politics and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ciuk, D. J. (2017). Democratic values? A racial group-based analysis of core political values, partisanship, and ideology. Political Behavior, 39, 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 808–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. The Adapted Mind, 163, 163–228.Google Scholar
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
- Druckman, J. N., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). Learning more from political communication experiments: Pretreatment and its effects. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 875–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, G., & Neundorf, A. (2018). Core political values and the long-term shaping of partisanship in the British electorate. British Journal of Political Science, 1, 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000339.Google Scholar
- Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24(1), 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feldman, S. (2013). Political ideology. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Feldman, S., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2001). The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare. American Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 658–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 530–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1967). “On face-work, interaction ritual (pp. 5–45). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
- Goren, P. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 881–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goren, P., Federico, C. M., & Kittilson, M. C. (2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 805–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holtgraves, T. (1992). The linguistic realization of face management: Implications for language production and comprehension, person perception, and cross-cultural communication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huckfeldt, R. (1983). The social context of political change: Durability, volatility, and social influence. American Political Science Review, 77(4), 929–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huckfeldt, R., Mondak, J. J., Hayes, M., Pietryka, M. T., & Reilly, J. (2013). Networks, interdependence, and social influence in politics. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. The American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1099–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jacoby, W. G. (2006). Value choices and American public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jacoby, W. G. (2014). Is there a culture war? Conflicting value structures in American public opinion. The American Political Science Review, 108(4), 754–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the party line? Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior, 27(2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kam, C. D., & Trussler, M. J. (2017). At the nexus of experimental and observational research: Theory, specification, and analysis of experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects. Political Behavior, 39(4), 789–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Klar, S. (2014). Partisanship in a social setting. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klar, S., & Krupnikov, Y. (2016). Independent politics: How American disdain for parties leads to political inaction. Political Science Quarterly, 132(1), 191–193.Google Scholar
- Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. (2018). Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(6), 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knutsen, O. (1995). Party choice. In J. W. Van Deth & E. Scarbrough (Eds.), The impact of values (pp. 460–491). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kuklinski, J. H. (2001). Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kuran, T. (1997). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lavine, H., & Snyder, M. (1996). Cognitive processes and the functional matching effect in persuasion: The mediating role of subjective perceptions of message quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 580–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Levendusky, M. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32(1), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCann, J. A. (1997). Electoral choices and core value change: The 1992 presidential campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 564–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meyer, G. W. (1994). Social information processing and social networks: A test of social influence mechanisms. Human Relations, 47(9), 1013–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mutz, D. C. (1992). Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behavior, 14(2), 89–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence: How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nelson, T. E., & Garst, J. (2005). Values-based political messages and persuasion: Relationships among speaker, recipient, and evoked values. Political Psychology, 26(4), 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peffley, M., Knigge, P., & Hurwitz, J. (2001). A multiple values model of political tolerance. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rothschild, J. E., Howat, A. J., Shafranek, R. M., & Busby, E. C. (2018). Pigeonholing partisans: Stereotypes of party supporters and partisan polarization. Political Behavior, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9457-5.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic Personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal study. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seligman, C., & Katz, A. N. (1996). The dynamics of value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion (pp. 133–165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Stone, D. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision-making (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Terkildsen, N. (1993). When white voters evaluate black candidates: The processing implications of candidate skin color, prejudice, and self-monitoring. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1032–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Valentino, N. A., & Nardis, Y. (2013). Political communication: Form and consequence of the information environment. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Weber, C. R., Lavine, H., Huddy, L., & Federico, C. M. (2014). Placing racial stereotypes in context: Social desirability and the politics of racial hostility. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 579–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar