Civic Duty and Voter Turnout
We argue that two different sets of considerations shape the decision to vote or abstain in an election–ethical and non-ethical. First the citizen may vote out of a sense of duty. Failing that, she may vote because she has strong preferences about the outcome of the election. Abstention occurs when neither duty nor a sufficiently strong preference is present. The implication is that while duty and preference each have strong positive effects on turnout, they also have a negative interaction effect, since the impact of preference is much weaker among those with a sense of duty. We present a wide array of empirical evidence that systematically supports our claim that the turnout decision is importantly shaped by this causal heterogeneity. Thus a turnout model misses something fundamental if it does not take into account the effect of civic duty.
KeywordsDuty Turnout Preference Ethical voting
We thank Charles Beitz, Robert George, and Alan Patten for helping us navigate the political theory literature on political obligation and the duty to vote. Larry Bartels and Aram Hur gave us the benefit of a careful reading of an early version. The Princeton Department of Politics supplied research funds, as did the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We also benefited from dedicated and professional research assistance by Simon St-Vincent and Jason Roy. We thank the reviewers for their very helpful comments and suggestions. The data for replication are posted at openICPSR.
- Achen, C., & Hur, A. (2011). Civic duty and turnout in Japan and South Korea. Korean Election Studies, 1, 45–68.Google Scholar
- Annenberg Public Policy Center. (2010). University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved February 26, 2010, from http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/ProjectDetails.aspx?myId=1.
- Barry, B. (1978 ). Sociologists, economists and democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Berry, W. D., Golder, M., & Milton, D. (2009). The importance of fully testing conditional theories positing interaction. Manuscript, Political Science Department, Florida State University.Google Scholar
- Blais, A. (2009). What does it take to go to the polls: Preference and/or duty. Presented at the 2009 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, 2–5 April 2009.Google Scholar
- Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1997). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, D. E. (2006). Why we vote. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Dalton, R. J. (2008). The good citizen. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Hur, A. (2017). Communal duty and democratic citizenship. Book Manuscript, Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University.Google Scholar
- Kam, C. D., & Franzese, R. J., Jr. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (1997 ). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kittilson, M. C., & Anderson, C. J. (2011). Electoral supply and voter turnout. In R. J. Dalton & C. J. Anderson (Eds.), Citizens, context, and choice: How context shapes electoral choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Maldonado, A. (2015). The origins and consequences of compulsory voting in Latin America. Ph.D. Dissertation, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
- Manski, C. F., & McFadden, D. (1981). Alternative estimators and sample designs for discrete choice analysis. In C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds.), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- McDonald, M. (2015). United States Elections Project. http://www.electproject.org/home/voter-turnout/voter-turnout-data.
- Merriam, C. E., & Gosnell, H. F. (1924). Non-voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Milbrath, L. W. (1965). Political participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Rosenstone, S., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1981). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Teixeira, R. A. (1992). The disappearing American voter. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in american politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes?. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar