The Personality of the Politically Ambitious
Until recently, political ambition has largely been considered to be a product of the institutional and political environment. We argue that individual personality plays a significant role in nascent political ambition and progressive ambition. Using a nationally representative survey in the United States and a survey of public officials, we find a strong relationship between personality traits and nascent ambition. We find that individuals with higher levels of extraversion and openness are more likely to consider running for office, while agreeable and conscientious individuals are significantly less interested. We also find that personality traits do not relate to progressive ambition in the same way as they do to nascent ambition. In fact, they are weaker predictors of progressive ambition than they are of nascent ambition. We argue that democratic elections and public service attract certain types of individuals to seek office, which has implications for elite behavior and representation.
KeywordsPolitical ambition Personality Progressive ambition
- Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (pp. 1–181). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Bakker, B. N., & Lelkes, Y. (2016). Selling ourselves short? How abbreviated measures of personality change the way think about personality and politics. University of Amsterdam Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Barber, J. D. (1965). The lawmakers: Recuritment and adoption to legislative life. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Bem, S. L. (1981). A manual for the bem sex role inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
- Brim, O. G., Baltes, P. B., Bumpass, L. L., Cleary, P. D., Featherman, D. L., Hazzard, W. R., Kessler, R. C., Lachman, M. E., Markus, H. R., Marmot, M. G., Rossi, A. S., Ryff, C. D., & Shweder, R. A. (2011). National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS), 1995–1996. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) [distributor].Google Scholar
- Butler, D. M., & Dynes, A. M. (2017). Past survey results. American Municipal Officials Survey. Retrieved 21 December, 2017, from http://www.municipalsurvey.org/past-survey-results/.
- Clifford, S., Kirkland, J. H., & Simas, E. N. (forthcoming). How dispositional empathy influences nascent political ambition. Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
- Hartman, R. R. (2012). 78 percent of americans frustrated by negative campaigns, Poll Finds. Yahoo! News.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, G. C., & Kernell, S. (1981). Strategy and choice in congressional elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Klingler, J. D., Hollibaugh, G. E., Jr., & Ramey, A. J. (2016). What I like about you: Legislator personality and legislator approval. In The meetings of the american political science association, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
- Lasswell, H. D. (1948). Power and personality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five factor model of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, M. G. (2014). Subsidizing democracy: How public funding changes elections, and how it can work in the future. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Oliver, E. J., Ha, S. E., & Callen, Z. (2012). Local elections and the politics of small-scale democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Reeves, R. (2011). Politicians are different from you and me. Retrieved January 18, 2017, from http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/politicians_are_different_from_you_and_me_20110608?ln.
- Remmel, M. (2016). The reliability of self-reported personality responses in political elites: Using second-hand reports to investigate the utility of state legislators’ self-reported personality inventories. Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
- Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryff, C. D., Almeida, D. M., Ayanian, J. S., Carr, D. S., Cleary, P. D., Coe, C., Davidson, R., Krueger, R. F., Lachman, M. E., Marks, N. F., Mroczek, D. K., Seeman, T., Seltzer, M. M., Singer, B. H., Sloan, R. P., Tun, P. A., Weinstein, M., Williams, D. (2012). National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS II), 2004–2006. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) [distributor].Google Scholar
- Schlesinger, J. A. (1966). Ambition and politics: Political careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Schlesinger, J. A. (1991). Political parties and the winning of office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- VandenBos, G. R. (2007). APA disctionary of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar