Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 935–965 | Cite as

The Bipolar Voter: On the Effects of Actual and Perceived Party Polarization on Voter Turnout in European Multiparty Democracies

  • Mert Moral
Original Paper

Abstract

Despite the growing literature on polarization, students of comparative politics have not yet been able to reach much assured understanding of how party polarization influences voter turnout in multiparty settings, which often put on offer both centrist, and divergent mainstream and niche party policies. I evaluate how politically sophisticated and unsophisticated citizens with different ideological preferences respond to high and increasing party polarization by employing individual- and party system-level data from 17 European multiparty democracies. I hypothesize that high levels of actual and perceived party polarization increase voter turnout, and policy seeking, sophisticated citizens are more likely to turn out when polarization in party policy offerings in the short run increases their utility from voting. The empirical analyses show that high party polarization increases both politically sophisticated and unsophisticated citizens’ propensities to turn out. However, such positive effect for the most part comes from the between- and within-party systems differences in actual party polarization, rather than how individual citizens perceive that. The implications of these findings with respect to strategic position taking incentives of political parties and the effects of the knowledge gap between sophisticated and unsophisticated citizens on political participation and democratic representation are discussed in the concluding section.

Keywords

Party polarization Voter turnout Political sophistication Perceived polarization Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 111th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association and at the Comparative-American Politics Workshop in Binghamton University. I thank to the participants, Michael D. McDonald, Olga V. Shvetsova, Robin E. Best, three anonymous reviewers, and the Editor for helpful suggestions. Any remaining errors are, of course, my own.

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I. (1978). The impact of a presidential debate on voter rationality. American Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 680–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramowitz, A. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abramowitz, A. I., & Stone, W. J. (2006). The bush effect: Polarization, turnout, and activism in the 2004 presidential election. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adams, J., & Merrill, S, I. I. I. (2003). Voter turnout and candidate strategies in American elections. Journal of Politics, 65(1), 161–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2006a). Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 513–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adams, J., Dow, J. K., & Merrill, S, I. I. I. (2006b). The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention: Applications to presidential elections. Political Behavior, 28(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Aldrich, J. H. (1983). A downsian spatial model with party activism. American Political Science Review, 77(4), 974–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aldrich, J. H., & McGinnis, M. D. (1989). A model of party constraints on optimal candidate positions. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 12(4/5), 437–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Best, R. E., & Dow, J. K. (2015). Simplicity is a virtue: Measuring party system polarization. Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Blais, A. (2006). What affects voter turnout? Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Budge, I., & McDonald, M. (2006). Choices parties define. Party Politics, 12(4), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callander, S., & Wilson, C. H. (2007). Turnout, polarization, and duverger’s law. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Rehabilitating duverger’s theory: Testing the mechanical and strategic modifying effects of electoral laws. Comparative Political Studies, 39(6), 679–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Committee on Political Parties APSA. (1950). Toward a more responsible two-party system: A report of the committee on political parties. American Political Science Review, 44(Supplement), 1–96.Google Scholar
  18. Cox, G. W. (1990). Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 903–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox, G. W. (1997). Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crepaz, M. M. (1990). The impact of party polarization and postmaterialism on voter turnout: A comparative study of 16 industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 18, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. CSES (2007) CSES Module 2 full release. The comparative study of electoral systems. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://www.cses.org.
  22. CSES (2013) CSES Module 3 full release. The comparative study of electoral systems. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://www.cses.org.
  23. Dalton, R. J. (2008). The quantity and the quality of party systems: Party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies, 41(7), 899–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dow, J. K. (2011). Party-system extremism in majoritarian and proportional electoral systems. British Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Esteban, J. M., & Ray, D. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica, 62(4), 819–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ezrow, L. (2008). On the inverse relationship between votes and proximity for niche parties. European Journal of Political Research, 47, 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ezrow, L., & Xezonakis, G. (2011). Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings. Comparative Political Studies, 44(9), 1152–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ezrow, L., & Xezonakis, G. (2016). Satisfaction with democracy and voter turnout: A temporal perspective. Party Politics, 22(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2011). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson-Longman.Google Scholar
  31. Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Garner, A., & Palmer, H. (2011). Polarization and issue consistency over time. Political Behavior, 33(2), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and vote turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geys, B. (2006). Explaining voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 637–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hetherington, M. J. (2008). Turned off or turned on? How polarization affects political engagement. In P. S. Nivola & D. W. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? Consequences and correction of America’s polarized politics. Harrisonburg, Virginia: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Putting polarization in perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 413–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution : Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Inglehart, R. F. (2008). Changing values among western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jacoby, W. G., Ciuk, D., & Pyle, K. (2010). Citizen perceptions of candidate ideology in the 2008 election. Annual meeting of the American political science association, Wasington, DC.Google Scholar
  41. Knutsen, O., & Kumlin, S. (2005). Value orientations and party choice. In J. Thomassen (Ed.), The European voter: A comparative study of modern democracies (pp. 125–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lachat, R. (2008). The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies, 27(4), 687–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Jacoby, W. G., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Markus, G. B., & Converse, P. E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1055–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. McDonald, M. D., & Moral, M. (2015). On observing the variety of party policy offerings in national left-right policy space. Annual meeting of the American political science association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  47. Miller, G., & Schofield, N. (2003). Activists and partisan realignment in the united states. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norris, P. (2004). Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Page, B. I., & Brody, R. A. (1972). Policy voting and the electoral process: The vietnam war issue. American Political Science Review, 66(3), 979–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pardos-Prado, S., Galais, C., & Munoz, J. (2014). The dark side of proportionality: Conditional effects of proportional features on turnout. Electoral Studies, 35, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Plane, D. L., & Gershtenson, J. (2004). Candidates’ ideological locations, abstention, and turnout in U.S. midterm senate elections. Political Behavior, 26(1), 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Powell, G. B. (1982). Contemporary democracies: Participation, stability and violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rabinowitz, G., & Macdonald, S. E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 93–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Riker, W. H. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rogowski, J. C. (2014). Electoral choice, ideological conflict, and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Schofield, N., & Miller, G. (2007). Elections and activist coalitions in the united states. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 518–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Siaroff, A., & Merer, J. W. A. (2002). Parliamentary election turnout in europe since 1990. Political Studies, 50, 916–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steiner, N. D., & Martin, C. W. (2012). Economic integration, party polarisation and electoral turnout. West European Politics, 35(2), 238–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thornton, J. R. (2013). The impact of elite polarization on partisan ambivalence and indifference. Political Behavior, 35, 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations