Political Behavior

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 747–766 | Cite as

Negative Advertising and the Dynamics of Candidate Support

Original Paper

Abstract

Scholars have spent a great deal of effort examining the effects of negative advertising on citizens’ perceptions of candidates. Much of this work has used experimental designs and has produced mixed findings supporting one of two competing theories. First, negative ads may harm candidates who sponsor them because citizens tend to dislike negativity. Second, negativity may drive down citizens’ support for the targeted candidate because the attacks give people reasons to reject the target. We argue that the mixed findings produced by prior research may be driven by a disregard for campaign dynamics. We present a critical test of these two theories using data drawn from 80 statewide elections—37 gubernatorial and 43 U.S. Senate contests—from three election years and public opinion polling collected during the last 12 weeks of each campaign. We find that a candidate’s support declines as her advertising strategy includes a higher proportion of negative ads relative to her opponent and that this process unfolds slowly over the course of the campaign.

Keywords

Negative campaigning Attack advertising Political advertising Campaigns Candidate support 

Supplementary material

11109_2016_9336_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (157 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 157 kb)

References

  1. Alvarez, R. M. (1997). Information and elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A., & Valentino, N. (1994). Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? American Political Science Review, 88(December), 829–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banda, K. K. (2013). The dynamics of campaign issue agendas. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 13(4), 446–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banda, K. K. (2014). Issue-based negativity and candidate assessment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(3), 707–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banda, K. K. (2015). Competition and the dynamics of issue convergence. American Politics Research, 43(5), 821–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banda, K. K., & Carsey, T. M. (2015). Two-stage elections, strategic candidates, and campaign agendas. Electoral Studies, 40, 221–230.Google Scholar
  8. Bartels, L. (2006). Priming and persuasion in presidential campaigns. In H. E. Brady & R. Johnston (Eds.), Capturing campaign effects (pp. 78–112). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Basil, M., Schooler, C., & Reeves, B. (1991). Positive and negative political advertising: Effectiveness of ads and perceptions of candidates. In F. Biocca (Ed.) Television and poltical advertising (Vol. 1). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bewley, R. A. (1979). The direct estimation of the equilibrium response in a linear dynamic model. Economics Letters, 3(4), 357–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Darmofal, D., & Farrell, C. A. (2009). The aggregate dynamics of campaigns. Journal of Politics, 71(January), 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How campaign Ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Politial Science, 49(March), 388–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brians, C. L., & Wattenberg, M. P. (1996). Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Politial Science, 40(January), 172–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carsey, T. M. (2000). Campaign dynamics: The race for governor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carsey, T. M., Jackson, R. A., Stewart, M., & Nelson, J. P. (2011). Strategic candidates, campaign dynamics, and campaign advertising in gubernatorial races. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 11(September), 269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clinton, J. D., & Lapinski, J. S. (2004). ’Targeted’ advertising and voter turnout: An experimental study of the 2000 presidential election. The Journal of Politics, 66(February), 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Damore, D. F. (2002). Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative. Political Reseach Quarterly, 55(September), 669–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DeBoef, S., & Keele, L. (2008). Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doherty, D., & Scott Adler, E. (2014). The persuasive effects of partisan campaign mailers. Political Reseach Quarterly, 67(3), 562–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the “Narrow Data Base. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (Vol. 4, pp. 41–57). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press chapte.Google Scholar
  22. Finkel, S. E., & Geer, J. G. (1998). A spot check: Casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 42(April), 573–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franklin, C. H. (1991). Eschewing obfuscation? Campaigns and the perception of U.S. Senate incumbents. American Political Science Review, 858, 1193–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franz, M. M., & Ridout, T. N. (2007). Does political advertising persuade? Political Behavior, 29(December), 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freedman, P., Franz, M., & Goldstein, K. (2004). Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. American Journal of Political Science, 48(October), 723–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2011). Variability in citizens’ reactions to different types of negative campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., & Woodall, G. S. (2009). Bad for men, better for women: The impact of stereotypes during political campaigns. Political Behavior, 31(1), 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garramone, G. M. (1984). Voter responses to negative political ads. Journalism Quarterly, 61(Summer), 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garramone, G. M., Atkin, C. K., Pinkleton, B. E., & Cole, R. T. (1990). Effects of negative political advertising on the political process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34(Summer), 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geer, J., & Lau, R. R. (2006). Filling in the blanks: A new method for estimating campaign effects. British Journal of Political Science, 36(April), 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geer, J. G. (2006). In defense of negativity: Attack ads in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gelman, A., & King, G. (1993). Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable? British Journal of Political Science, 23, 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gerber, A. S., Gimpel, J. G., Green, D. P., & Shaw, D. R. (2011). How large and long-lasting are the persuasive effects of televised campaign ads? Results from a randomized field experiment. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldstein, K., & Freedman, P. (2002). Campaign advertising and voter turnout: New evidence for a stimulation effect. The Journal of Politics, 64(August), 721–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldstein, K., & Ridout, T. N. (2004). Measuring the effects of televised political advertising in the United States. Annual Review Political Science, 7, 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grant, T., & Lebo, M. J. (2016). Error Correction models with political time series. Political Analysis, 24(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1997). The impact of negative advertising on evaluations of political candidates: The 1993 Canadian federal election. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(June), 204–223.Google Scholar
  38. Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hill, R. P. (1989). An exploration of voter responses to political advertisements. Journal of Advertising, 18(Winter), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hill, S. J., Lo, J., Vavreck, L., & Zaller, J. (2013). How quickly we forget: The duration of persuasion effects from mass communication. Political Communication, 30(4), 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter: Wedge issues in presidential campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hitchon, J. C., & Chang, C. (1995). Effects of gender schematic processing on the reception of political commercials for men and women candidates. Communication Research, 22(August), 430–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hitchon, J. C., Chang, C., & Harris, R. (1997). Should women emote? Perceptual bias and opinion change in response to political ads for candidates of different genders. Political Communication, 14(January), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Holbrook, T. M. (1996). Do campaigns matter?. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. F. (2000). New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jackson, R. A., & Carsey, T. M. (2007). U.S. Senate campaigns, negative advertising, and voter mobilization in the 1998 midterm election. Electoral Studies, 26(March), 180–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (1999). The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Kahn, K. F., & Kenney, P. J. (2004). No holds barred: Negativity in united states senate campaigns. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  49. Kaid, L. L. (1997). Effects of television spots on images of Dole and Clinton. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(August), 1085–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kaid, L. L., & Boydston, J. (1987). An experimental study of the effectiveness of negative political advertisements. Communication Quarterly, 35(Spring), 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kaid, L. L., Chanslor, M., & Hovind, M. (1992). The influence of program and commercial type on political advertising effectiveness. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 36(Summer), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. King, J. D., & McConnell, J. B. (2003). The effect of negative campaign advertising tone on vote choice: The mediating influence of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 84(December), 843–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Krupnikov, Y. (2011). When does negativity demobilize? Tracing the conditional effect of negative campaigning on voter turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 55(October), 797–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Krupnikov, Y. (2012). Negative advertising and voter choice: The role of ads in candidate selection. Political Communication, 29(4).Google Scholar
  55. Krupnikov, Y. (2014). How negativity can increase and decrease voter turnout: The effect of timing. Political Communication, 31(3), 446–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Krupnikov, Y. (2015). Accentuating the negative: Candidate race and campaign strategy. Political Communication, 32(1), 152–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lau, R., Sigelman, L., & Rovner, I. B. (2007). The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic reassessment. The Journal of Politics, 69(October), 1176–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lau, R. R. (1982). Negativity in political perception. Political Behavior, 4(4), 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lau, R. R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29(February), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lemert, J. B., Wanta, W., & Lee, T.-T. (1999). Party identification and negative advertising in a U.S Senate election. Journal of Communication, 49(2), 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lemert, J. B., Elliot, W. R., Bernstein, J. M., Rosenberg, W. L., & Nestvold, K. J. (1991). News verdicts, the debates, and presidential campaigns. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  62. Lenz, G. S. (2009). Learning and opinion change, not priming: Reconsidering the priming hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(October), 821–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87(September), 672–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Martinez, M. D., & Delegal, T. (1990). The irrelevance of negative campaigns to political trust: Experimental and survey results. Political Communication and Persuasion, 7 (January/March), 25–40.Google Scholar
  65. Mattes, K., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2015). The positive case for negative campaigning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Matthew, D., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (1998). The black-sheep effect: How positive and negative advertisements affect voters’ perceptions of the sponsor of the advertisement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(20), 1903–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Merritt, S. (1984). Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings. Journal of Advertising, 13(Fall), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Min, Y. (2004). News coverage of negative political campaigns: An experiment of negative campaign effects on turnout and candidate preference. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 9(Fall), 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peterson, D. A. M. (2004). Certainty or accessibility: Attitude strength in candidate evaluations. American Journal of Political Science, 48(3), 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peterson, D. A. M. (2009). Campaign learning and vote determinants. American Journal of Political Science, 53(April), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pinkleton, B. E. (1998). Effects of print comparative political advertising on political decision-making and participation. Journal of Communication, 48(Autumn), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Roddy, B. L., & Garramone, G. M. (1988). Appeals and strategies of negative political advertising. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 32(May), 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shapiro, M. A., & Rieger, R. H. (1992). Comparing positive and negative political advertising on radio. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 69(March), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shen, F., & Denis Wu, H. (2002). Effects of soft-money issue advertisements on candidate evaluation and voting preference: An exploration. Mass Communication and Society, 5(4), 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Skaperdas, S., & Grofman, B. (1995). Modeling negative campaigning. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles, and swings (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  77. Thurber, J. A., & Nelson, C. J. (2000). Campaign warriors: Political consultants in elections. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  78. Vavreck, L. (2009). The message matters: The economy and presidential campaigns. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Weaver-Lariscy, R. A., & Tinkham, S. F. (1996). Advertising message strategies in U.S. congressional campaigns: 1982, 1990. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 18(1), 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Windett, J. H. (2014). Gendered campaign strategies in U.S. elections. American Politics Research, 42(4), 628–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wlezien, C., & Erikson, R. S. (2002). The timeline of presidential election campaigns. Journal of Politics, 64(4), 969–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wooldridge, J. M. (2000). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. South-Western College.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nevada, RenoRenoUSA
  2. 2.Saint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations