Advertisement

Political Behavior

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 911–932 | Cite as

Call to (In)Action: The Effects of Racial Priming on Grassroots Mobilization

  • Hans J. G. HassellEmail author
  • Neil Visalvanich
Original Paper

Abstract

Previous work on the effects of race on the political behaviors of white Americans is beset with two problems. First, much of the work on the effect of race has looked primarily at attitudes as opposed to political action around a policy. Second, studies of the relationship between race and policy have revolved around issues for which it is inherently difficult to separate the effects of racial prejudice from conservative ideology. To address these problems, we examine the willingness of individuals to write their member of Congress in support of a non-racial political cause, which we experimentally treat with racial cues. We also experimentally present a comparison with a non-racial but similar ‘specialized’ group, which allows us to distinguish concerns about race from concerns about specialized benefits objectionable to conservatives. We show that whites with higher levels of racial resentment are less likely to act politically in support of a policy perceived as benefiting ethnic and racial minorities.

Keywords

Race Priming Political participation Grassroots mobilization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Marisa Abrajano, Megan Becker, Chris Fariss, James Fowler, Zoli Hajnal, Aaron Hagler, Brad LeVeck, Johanna Schuster-Craig, Candis Watts Smith, and the Human Nature Group at UC-San Diego for their advice and assistance on this project. A previous version of this paper was presented at the 2012 meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association. All errors, of course, remain our own.

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. (1994). Issue evaluation reconsidered: Racial attitudes and partisanship in the U.S. electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, S. (1993). Regulating lobbyists and interest group influence. Journal of Politics, 55(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedolla, L. G., & Michelson, M. R. (2012). Mobilizing inclusion: Transforming the electorate through get-out-the-vote campaigns. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergen, D. E. (2009). Does grassroots lobbying work? A field experiment measuring the effects of an e-mail lobbying campaign on legislative behavior. American Politics Research, 37(2), 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berinsky, A. J. (1999). The two faces of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1209–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berinsky, A. J. (2004). Silent voices: Public opinion and political participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2013). Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bobo, L., & Kluegel, J. R. (1993). Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes. American Sociological Review, 58, 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, C. W., Powell, L. W., & Wilcox, C. (1995). Serious money: Fundraising and contributing in presidential nomination campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler, D. M., & Nickerson, D. W. (2011). Can learning constituency opinion affect how legislators vote? Results from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 6(1), 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carmines, E. G., & Merriman, W. R. (1993). The changing American Dilemma: Liberal values and racial policies. In P. M. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Politics, prejudice, and the American Dilemma. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cho, W. K. T., & Gimpel, J. G. (2007). Prospecting for (campaign) gold. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cigler, A. J., & Loomis, B. (2011). Interest group politics (8th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  16. Congressional Management Foundation. (2008). Communicating with Congress: Recommendations for Improving the Democratic Dialogue. Retrieved August 25, 2014 from http://www.congressfoundation.org/storage/documents/CMF_Pubs/cwc_recommendationsreport.pdf.
  17. Craig, M. A., & Richeson, J. A. (2014). On the precipice of a ‘Majority-Minority’ America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects white Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1189–1197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Druckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants: A defense of the ‘narrow data base’. In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, & A. Lupia (Eds.), Handbook of experimental political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Federico, C. M., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: The antecedents and consequences of ‘principled objections’ to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 488–502.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Feldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race-conscious programs: Principles or prejudice? American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  22. Francia, P. L., Green, J. C., Herrnson, P. S., Powell, L. W., & Wilcox, C. (2003). The financiers of congressional elections: Investors, ideologues and intimates. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gilens, M. (1995). Racial attitudes and opposition to welfare. Journal of Politics, 57(4), 994–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans Hate Welfare. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Godwin, R. K. (1988). The structure, content, and use of political direct mail. Polity, 20(3), 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grant, J. T., & Rudolph, T. J. (2002). To give or not to give: Modeling Individuals’ contribution decisions. Political Behavior, 24(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Han, H. C. (2008). Does the content of political appeals matter in motivating participation? A field experiment on self-disclosure in political appeals. Political Behavior, 31(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hassell, H. J. G. (2011). Looking beyond the voting constituency: A study of campaign donation solicitations in the 2008 presidential primary and general election. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1), 27–42.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hassell, H. J. G., & Monson, J. Q. (2014). Campaign targets and messages in campaign fundraising. Political Behavior, 36(2), 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henry, P. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19(2), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hopkins, D. J. (2009). No more wilder effect, never a whitman effect: When and why polls mislead about black and female candidates. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 769–781.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huber, G. A., & Lapinski, J. S. (2006). The ‘Race Card’ revisited: Assessing racial priming in policy contests. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kinder, D. R., & Kam, C. D. (2010). Us against them: Ethnocentric foundations of American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kinder, D. R., & Mendelberg, T. (2000). Individualism reconsidered. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about Racism in America (pp. 44–74). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Krupnikov, Y., & Levine, A. S. (2014). Cross-sample comparisons and external validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13(2), 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levine, A. S. (2015). American insecurity: Why our economic fears lead to political inaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malbin, M. J. (2009). Small donors, large donors and the internet: The case for public financing after Obama. Campaign Finance Institute Working Paper.Google Scholar
  42. Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection (1st ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  43. McConahay, J. B. (1982). Self-interest versus racial attitudes as correlates of anti-busing attitudes in Louisville: Is it the buses or the blacks? Journal of Politics, 44(3), 692–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mendelberg, T. (2008). Racial priming: Issues in research design and interpretation. Perspectives on Politics, 6(1), 135–140.Google Scholar
  46. Merollo, J. S., Ramakrishnan, K., & Haynes, C. (2013). ’Illegal’, ‘undocumented’, or ‘unauthorized”: equivalency frames, issues frames, and public opinion on immigration. Perspectives on Politics, 11, 789–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2004). Threat as a motivator of political activism: A field experiment. Political Psychology, 25(4), 507–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in congress in congress. American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Stern, L. N. (2010). Running experiments on amazon mechanical turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), 411–419.Google Scholar
  51. Rogers, T., Fox, C. R., & Gerber, A. S. (2012). Rethinking why people vote: Voting as dynamic social expression. In E. Shafir (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schuman, H. (2000). The perils of correlation, the lure of labels, and the beauty of negative results. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 302–323). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  53. Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1980). Public opinion and public ignorance: The fine line between attitudes and nonattitudes. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1214–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 259–275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sears, D. O., Hensler, C. P., & Speer, L. K. (1979). Whites’ opposition to ‘busing’: Self-interest or symbolic politics?”. American Political Science Review, 73(2), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sears, D. O., Van Laar, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism? The origins of white Americans’ opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(1), 16–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shea, D. M., & Burton, M. J. (2006). Campaign craft: The strategies, tactics, and art of political campaign management. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  58. Sidanius, J., Singh, P., Hetts, J. J., & Federico, C. (2000). It’s not affirmative action, it’s the blacks. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 191–235). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Skocpol, T. (1991). Targeting within universalism: Politically viable policies to combat poverty in the United States. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
  60. Sniderman, P. M., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Reaching beyond race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Sniderman, P. M., Carmines, E. G., Layman, G. C., & Carter, M. (1996). Beyond race: Social justice as a race neutral ideal. American Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sniderman, P. M., & Piazza, T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stout, C., & Kline, R. (2008). Ashamed not to vote for an African-American: Ashamed to vote for a woman: An analysis of the Bradley effect from 1982 to 2006. Center for the Study of Democracy, UC Irvine, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  64. Strickland, R. A., & Whicker, M. L. (1992). Comparing the wilder and gantt campaigns: A model for black candidate success in statewide elections. PS: Political Science and Politics, 25(2), 204–212.Google Scholar
  65. Tarman, C., & Sears, D. O. (2008). The conceptualization and measurement of symbolic racism. Journal of Politics, 67(3), 731–761.Google Scholar
  66. Terkildsen, N. (1993). When white voters evaluate black candidates: The processing implications of candidate skin color, prejudice, and self-monitoring. American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1032–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vogel, R. J., & Ardoin, P. (2008). Ask me no questions, I’ll tell you no lies: Does the Bradley effect still exist? Race Gender and Class, 15(3), 65–84.Google Scholar
  68. Weaver, V. M. (2012). The electoral consequences of skin color: The “Hidden” side of race in politics. Political Behavior, 34(1), 159–192.Google Scholar
  69. Weinberg, J., Freese, J., & McElhattan, D. (2014). Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociological Science, 1, 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PoliticsCornell CollegeMt. VernonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceBucknell UniversityLewisburgUSA

Personalised recommendations