Political Behavior

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 753–776 | Cite as

Oxytocin and the Biological Basis for Interpersonal and Political Trust

  • Jennifer L. Merolla
  • Guy Burnett
  • Kenneth V. Pyle
  • Sheila Ahmadi
  • Paul J. Zak
Original Paper

Abstract

Political scientists have documented the many ways in which trust influences attitudes and behaviors that are important for the legitimacy and stability of democratic political systems. They have also explored the social, economic, and political factors that tend to increase levels of trust in others, in political figures, and in government. Neuroeconomic studies have shown that the neuroactive hormone oxytocin, a peptide that plays a key role in social attachment and affiliation in non-human mammals, is associated with trust and reciprocity in humans (e.g., Kosfeld et al., Nature 435:673–676, 2005; Zak et al., Horm Beh 48:522–527, 2005). While oxytocin has been linked to indicators of interpersonal trust, we do not know if it extends to trust in government actors and institutions. In order to explore these relationships, we conducted an experiment in which subjects were randomly assigned to receive a placebo or 40 IU of oxytocin administered intranasally. We show that manipulating oxytocin increases individuals’ interpersonal trust. It also has effects on trust in political figures and in government, though only for certain partisan groups and for those low in levels of interpersonal trust.

Keywords

Trust Government Biology Oxytocin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a grant to Paul J. Zak from the John Templeton Foundation. We thank the anonymous reviewers and editors for helpful feedback.

The experiments comply with the current laws of the United States. All of the procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the universities involved.

Supplementary material

11109_2012_9219_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (62 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 62 kb)

References

  1. Abramowitz, A. I., Saunders, K. L., & K.L., (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andari, E., Duhamel, J., Zalla, T., Herbrecht, E., Leboyer, M., & Sirigu, A. (2010). Promoting social behavior with oxytocin in high functioning autism spectrum disorders. PNAS, 107(9), 4389–4394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avery, J. M. (2009). Political mistrust among African Americans and support for the political system. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 132–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barraza, J. A., Ropacki, S., & Zak, P. J. Age, oxytocin release, and generosity (in progress).Google Scholar
  8. Barraza, J. A., & Zak, P. J. (2009). Empathy toward strangers triggers oxytocin release and subsequent generosity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2006). Predictive gaze cue and personality judgments: Should eye trust you? Psychological Science, 17, 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Booth, J. A., & Richard, P. B. (1998). Civil society, political capital, and democratization in Central America. The Journal of Politics, 60, 780–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Born, J., Lange, T., Kern, W., McGregor, G. P., Bickel, U., & Fehm, H. L. (2002). Sniffing neuropeptides: a transnasal approach to the human brain. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 514–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bremner, J. D., Krystal, J. H., Southwick, S. M., & Charney, D. S. (1995). Functional neuroanatomical correlates of the effects of stress on memory. Journal of Trauma and Stress, 8, 527–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chanley, V., Rudolph, T. J., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis”. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. The American Political Science Review, 68, 973–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Citrin, J., & Green, D. P. (1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Citrin, J., McClosky, H., Shanks, J. M., & Sniderman, P. M. (1975). Personal and political sources of political alienation. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cook, T. E., & Gronke, P. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. The Journal of Politics, 67, 784–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Corey, E. C., & Garand, J. C. (2002). Are government employees more likely to vote? An analysis of turnout in the 1996 U.S. national election. Public Choice, 111, 259–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Craig, S. C. (1993). The malevolent leaders: popular discontent in America. Boulder, CO: WestView.Google Scholar
  23. Craig, S. C. (1996). Broken contract: changing relationships between Americans and their government. Boulder, CO: WestView.Google Scholar
  24. Dennis, J., & Owen, D. (2001). Popular satisfaction with the party system and representative democracy in the United States. International Political Science Review, 22, 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dodd, M. D., Hibbing, J. R., & Smith, K. B. (2011). The politics of attention: gaze-cuing effects are moderated by political temperament. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C., & Herpertz, S. C. (2007). Oxytocin improves “mind-reading” in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 731–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geddes, L. (2010). With this test tube I thee wed. New Scientist, Feb., 13, 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guastella, A. J., Mitchell, P. B., & Dadds, M. R. (2008). Oxytocin increases gaze to the eye region of human faces. Biological Psychiatry, 63, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Halpern, D. (2001). Moral values, social trust and inequality can values explain crime? The British Journal of Criminology, 41(2), 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., & Ehlert, U. (2003). Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 1389–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. The American Political Science Review, 92, 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hetherington, M. J. (1999). The effect of political trust on the presidential vote, 1968–96. The American Political Science Review, 93, 311–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hetherington, M. J. (2004). Why trust matters: declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hetherington, M. J., & Globetti, S. (2002). Political trust and racial policy preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King, A. (1997). The vulnerable American politician. British Journal of Political Science, 27, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knack, S., & Zak, P. J. (2003). Building trust: Public policy, interpersonal trust, and economic development. Supreme Court Economic Review, 10, 91–107.Google Scholar
  37. Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levi, M., & Sherman, R. (1997). Rationalized bureaucracies and rational compliance. In C. Clague (Ed.), Institutions and economic development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lin, P., Grewal, N. S., Morin, C., Johnson, W. D., & Zak, P. J. (in press). Oxytocin increases the influence of public service advertisements. Public Library of Science ONE. Google Scholar
  40. Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. (1983). The decline of confidence in American institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 98, 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Locke, S. T., Shapiro, R. Y., & Jacobs, L. R. (1999). The impact of political debate on government trust: Reminding the public what the federal government does. Political Behavior, 21, 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L., Smith, V., & Trouard, T. (2001). Proclamation to National Academy of Sciences, 98, 11832–11835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68, 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore, C., & Dunham, P. J. (Eds.). (1995). Joint attention: Its origins and role in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Morhenn, V. B., Park, J. W., Piper, E., & Zak, P. J. (2008). Monetary sacrifice among strangers is mediated by endogenous oxytocin release after physical contact. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muller, E., & Seligson, M. A. (1994). Civic culture and democracy: The question of causal relationships. The American Political Science Review, 88, 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Orren, G. (1997). Fall from grace: The public’s loss of faith in government. In P. Zelikow, J. Nye Jr, & D. C. King (Eds.), Why people don’t trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., & Miller, J. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321(5896), 1667–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Putnam, R. P. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Putnam, R. P. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and. Politics, 28, 664–683.Google Scholar
  52. Putnam, R. P. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  53. Ragsdale, L. (1991). Strong feelings: Emotional responses to Presidents”. Political Behavior, 13, 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rahn, W. M., & Transue, J. E. (1998). Social trust and value change: The decline of social capital in American youth, 1976–1995. Political Psychology, 19, 545–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rudolph, T. J., & Evans, J. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schildkraut, D. J. (2005). The rise and fall of political engagement among Latinos: The role of identity and perceptions of discrimination. Political Behavior, 27(3), 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scholz, J. T., & Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 398–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, V. (1998). The two faces of Adam Smith. Southern Economic Journal, 65(1), 2–19.Google Scholar
  60. Sturgis, P., Read, S., Hatemi, P. K., Zhu, G., Trull, T., Wright, M. J., et al. (2010). A genetic basis for social trust? Political Behavior, 32, 205–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tavits, M. (2006). Making democracy work more? Exploring the linkage between social capital and government performance. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tomz, M., Wittenberg, J., & King, G. (2001). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.0. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  63. Tyler, T. R. (1994). Governing amid diversity: The effect of fair decisionmaking procedures on the legitimacy of government. Law & Society Review, 28, 809–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Uslaner, E. M. (1998). Social capital, television, and the “Mean World”: Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19, 441–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Weingast, B. R. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. The American Political Science Review, 91, 245–263.Google Scholar
  67. Zak, P. J. (2008). The neurobiology of trust. Scientific American, June, 88–95.Google Scholar
  68. Zak, P. J. (2011). The physiology of moral sentiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zak, P. J. (2012). The moral molecule: Vampire economics and the new science of good and evil. New York, NY: Dutton Press.Google Scholar
  70. Zak, P. J., Borja, K., Matzner, W. T., & Kurzban, R. (2004). The neurobiology of trust. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1032, 224–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zak, P. J., Borja, K., Matzner, W. T., & Kurzban, R. (2005a). The neuroeconomics of distrust: Sex differences in behavior and physiology. Cognitive Neuroscience Foundations of Behavior, 95, 360–363.Google Scholar
  72. Zak P.J., Borja, K., Matzner, W.T., & Kurzban, R. (2005b). Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. Hormones and Behavior, 48, 522–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zak, P. J., & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zak, P. J., Stanton, A. A., & Ahmadi, S. (2007). Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. Public Library of Science One, 2, e1128.Google Scholar
  75. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer L. Merolla
    • 1
  • Guy Burnett
    • 1
  • Kenneth V. Pyle
    • 1
  • Sheila Ahmadi
    • 3
  • Paul J. Zak
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Politics and Economics, Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA
  2. 2.Center for Neuroeconomic Studies and School of Politics and EconomicsClaremontUSA
  3. 3.Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and HypertensionGeffen School of Medicine, UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations