On the Causes and Consequences of Ballot Order Effects
- 757 Downloads
We investigate the effect of ballot order on the outcomes of California city council and school board elections. Candidates listed first win office between four and five percentage points more often than expected absent order effects. This first candidate advantage is larger in races with more candidates and for higher quality candidates. The first candidate advantage is similar across contexts: the magnitude of the effect is not statistically distinguishable in city council and in school board elections, in races with and without an open seat, and in races consolidated and not consolidated with statewide general elections. Standard satisficing models cannot fully explain ballot order effects in our dataset of multi-winner elections.
KeywordsBallot order effects School boards City council Satisificing
- Hill, S. (2010). Changing composition and changing allegiance in American elections. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Krosnick, J. A., Miller, J. M., & Tichy, M. P. (2004). An unrecognized need for ballot reform: The effects of candidate name order on election outcomes. In A. N. Crigler, M. R. Just, & E. J. McCaffery (Eds.), Rethinking the vote: The politics and prospects of American election reform (pp. 51–73). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Meredith, M. & Salant Y. (2007). Causes and consequences of ballot order effects. SIEPR Discussion Paper No. 0629.Google Scholar
- Thompson, A. M. (1993). Appendix: Serial position effects in the psychological literature. In Dunne, B. J., Dobyns, Y. H., & Jahn, R. G. Series position effects in random event generator experiments. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 8(2), 197–215.Google Scholar