Political Behavior

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 607–625 | Cite as

Al Qaeda Versus Big Brother: Anxiety About Government Monitoring and Support for Domestic Counterterrorism Policies

  • Samuel J. Best
  • Brian S. Krueger
  • Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz
Original Paper

Abstract

Explanatory models of attitudes toward U.S. domestic counterterrorism policy routinely incorporate individual concern over terrorism, but uniformly disregard concern about the government’s use of domestic surveillance. Indeed, one of the most prominent works of this kind explicitly argues that ordinary Americans will not perceive that government monitoring targets people like themselves and thus domestic surveillance programs will not generate anxiety. We question this assumption on theoretical and historical grounds. Our research uses a unique probability sample survey to demonstrate that significant portions of ordinary Americans feel anxious about domestic government monitoring. Moreover, the results show that anxiety about government monitoring negatively relates to attitudes toward domestic counterterrorism policies. Although never included in previous models, and even plainly dismissed as irrelevant, felt anxiety about government monitoring importantly predicts attitudes about domestic counterterrorism policies.

Keywords

Anxiety Domestic counter-terrorism policies Government monitoring Attitudes about terrorism Public opinion 

References

  1. Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arian, A. (1989). A people apart: Coping with national security problems in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33, 605–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berenbaum, H., Fujita, F., & Pfennig, J. (1995). Consistency, specificity, and correlates of negative emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2011). Government monitoring and political participation in the United States: The distinct roles of anger and anxiety. American Politics Research, 39, 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 959–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brody, R. A., & Shapiro, C. R. (1989). Policy failure and public support: The Iran-Contra affair and public assessment of President Reagan. Political Behavior, 11, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, A. L. (2003). Participatory reactions to policy threats: Senior citizens and the defense of Social Security and Medicare. Political Behavior, 25, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, W. K., Gimpel, J., & Wu, T. (2006). Clarifying the role of socioeconomic status in political participation: Policy threat and Arab American mobilization. Journal of Politics, 68, 977–991.Google Scholar
  9. Cohrs, J. C., Kielmann, S., Maes, J., & Moschner, B. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 5, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham, D. (2004). There’s something happening here: The new left, the Klan, and FBI counterintelligence. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, D. W., & Silver, B. D. (2004). Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domke, D. (2006). Going public as political strategy: The Bush Administration, an echoing press, and passage of the Patriot Act. Political Communication, 23, 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donner, F. J. (1980). The age of surveillance. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  14. Eysenck, M. W. (1992). Anxiety: The cognitive perspective. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  16. Frontline. (2006). Spying on the homefront. PBS. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/homefront/
  17. Gibson, J. L. (2008). Intolerance and political repression in the United States: A half century after McCarthyism. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grandy, O. H. (2003). Public opinion surveys and the formation of privacy policy. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haider-Markel, D. P., Joslyn, M. P., & Al-Baghal, M. T. (2006). Can we frame the terrorist threat? Issue frames, the perception of threat, and opinions on counterterrorism policies. Terrorism and Political Violence, 18, 545–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hetherington, M. J., & Weiler, J. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. (2007a). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler, & M. MacKuen (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 202–230). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Taber, C., & Lahav, G. (2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Weber, C. (2007b). The political consequences of perceived threat and felt insecurity. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 614, 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joslyn, M. R., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2007). Sociotropic concerns and support for counterterrorism policies. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 306–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kam, C. D., & Kinder, D. R. (2007). Terror and ethnocentrism: Foundations of American support for the War on Terrorism. Journal of Politics, 69, 318–336.Google Scholar
  26. Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R. M., & Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kinder, D. R., & Kam, C. D. (2009). Us against them: Ethnocentric foundations of American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lerner, J. S., Ganzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lichtblau, Eric. (2005). F.B.I. watched activist groups, new files show. New York Times, December 20. Google Scholar
  31. Locke, J. (2003). Two treatises of government and a letter concerning toleration. Binghamton: Vail-Ballou Press.Google Scholar
  32. Madison, J., Hamilton, A., Jay, J., & Kramnick, I. (1987). The Federalist Papers. Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  33. Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 82, 737–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M. B., Wolak, J., & Keele, L. (2006). The measure and mismeasure of emotion. In D. Redlawsk (Ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing (pp. 31–46). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & Mackuen, M. B. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Markon, J. (2010). FBI probes were improper, Justice says. Washington Post. September 20th.Google Scholar
  37. Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2009a). Democracy at risk: How terrorist threats affect the public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Merolla, J. L., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2009b). Terrorist threat, leadership, and vote choice: Evidence from three experiments. Political Behavior, 31, 575–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mill, J. S. (1991). On liberty and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mueller, J. (2009). Overblown: How politicians and the terrorism industry inflate national security threats, and why we believe them. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Posner, E., & Vermeule, A. (2007). Terror in the balance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schildkraut, D. J. (2009). The dynamics of public opinion on ethnic profiling after 9/11. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sniderman, P., Fletcher, J. F., Russell, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1996). The clash of rights liberty, equality, and legitimacy in pluralist democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Tir, J. (2010). Territorial diversion: Diversionary theory of war and territorial conflict. Journal of Politics, 72, 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolfendale, J. (2006). Terrorism, security, and the threat of counterterrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 29, 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel J. Best
    • 1
  • Brian S. Krueger
    • 2
  • Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations