The Consequences of Political Cynicism: How Cynicism Shapes Citizens’ Reactions to Political Scandals
- 2k Downloads
This paper argues cynicism toward elected officials colors how individuals in the mass public interpret information about political scandals. Specifically, citizens rely on prior levels of cynicism toward elected officials when assessing new information about potential political malfeasance. Drawing on panel data surrounding two prominent political scandals, this paper demonstrates prior levels of cynicism shape individuals’ interpretations of information about scandals, but cynicism does not affect the amount of attention individuals pay to scandals. Ultimately, the results shed light on individual-level variation in response to scandals, and suggest expressed cynicism toward politicians is a politically consequential individual-level attitude that affects whether or not political leaders can survive ethical transgressions.
- Barber, B. (1983). The logic and limits of trust. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Blais, A., Everitt, J., Fournier, P., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2005). The political psychology of voters’ reactions to a corruption scandal. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Capella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: the press and the public good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Citrin, J., & Muste, C. (1999). Trust in government. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cook, T., & Gronke, P. (2005). The skeptical American: Revisiting the meaning of trust in government and confidence in institutions. The Journal of Politics, 67(3), 784–803.Google Scholar
- CQ Weekly. (April 18, 1992). Overdrafts listed from most to least according to house ethics committee, pp. 1006–1007. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/WR102406617.
- CQ Weekly. (January 23, 2006). Three decades of lobbying scandal and repercussion, p. 239. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport109-000002037887.
- Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matter: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Holm, J. D., Bochner, A. P. and Kraus, S. (1976) Watergate hearings panel survey. [Computer file]. Cleveland, OH: J D. Holm, Cleveland State University, Department of Political Science [producer], 1974. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR07352.
- Johnston, D. (1992). Investigator finds evidence of crimes in house bank use. New York Times, 17 December.Google Scholar
- Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition: Making sense of people. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2006). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- Saad, L. (2009). Honesty and ethics poll finds congress’ image tarnished. http://www.gallup.com/poll/124625/honesty-ethics-poll-finds-congress-image-tarnished.aspx.
- Sweeney, P. D., & Gruber, K. L. (1984). Selective exposure: Voter information preferences and the watergate affair. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (46), 1208–1221.Google Scholar