Partisan Differences in Opinionated News Perceptions: A Test of the Hostile Media Effect
- 1.8k Downloads
The proliferation of opinion and overt partisanship in cable news raises questions about how audiences perceive this content. Of particular interest is whether audiences effectively perceive bias in opinionated news programs, and the extent to which there are partisan differences in these perceptions. Results from a series of three online experiments produce evidence for a relative hostile media phenomenon in the context of opinionated news. Although, overall, audiences perceive more story and host bias in opinionated news than in non-opinionated news, these perceptions—particularly perceptions of the host—vary as a function of partisan agreement with the news content. Specifically, issue partisans appear to have a “bias against bias,” whereby they perceive less bias in opinionated news with which they are predisposed to agree than non-partisans and especially partisans on the other side of the issue.
KeywordsCable news Opinionated news Hostile media effect Selective perception Media bias
Funding for this research was provided by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation as part of the Carnegie-Knight Initiative on the Future of Journalism Education. The author is extremely grateful to Vincent Price, Joseph Cappella, and Michael Delli Carpini for their advice and encouragement throughout the project, and to the anonymous reviewers for their feedback on previous versions of this manuscript.
- Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (2008). Echo Chamber. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, M. (2006). Anchor Olbermann counts on commentary to boost MSNBC’s ratings. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved from http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06346/745336-237.stm
- Carroll, J. S. (2004, May 16). Pseudo-journalists betray the public trust. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-op-carroll16may16,1,3379470.story?page=1&coll=la-news-comment-opinions&ctrack=2&cset=true
- Carter, B., & Steinberg, J. (2006, March 29). Anchor-advocate on immigration wins viewers. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/29/politics/29dobbs.html?ex=1301288400&en=d51eba9ff19dd15d&ei=5090%0D%0D&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
- D’Alessio, D. (2003). An experimental examination of readers’ perceptions of media bias. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80, 282–294.Google Scholar
- Entman, R. M. (2005). The nature and sources of news. In G. Overholser & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The press (pp. 48–65). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63, 451–462.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, J. T. (2005). The market and the media. In G. Overholser & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), The press (pp. 351–371). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Horrigan, J. B., & Smith, A. (2007, June). Home broadband adoption 2007. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Broadband%202007.pdf.
- Jamieson, K. H., Hardy, B., & Romer, D. (2007). The effectiveness of the press in serving the needs of American democracy. In The American Democracy Project (Ed.), A republic divided (pp. 21–51). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kann, P. (2006, November 1). Press freedom—and press responsibilities. Remarks at the Knight- Bagehot Anniversary Dinner. Retrieved from http://126.96.36.199/academic_programs/knight-bagehot/dinners/kann_speech.asp?
- Kaplan, R. L. (2002). Politics and the American press: The rise of objectivity, 1865–1920. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Lee, T. (2008). Bias in the news. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. doi: 10.1111/b.9781405131995.2008.x.
- Lemann, N. (2006, March 27). The wayward press: Fear factor. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/03/27/060327fa_fact
- McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Niven, D. (2002). Tilt? The search for media bias. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2008, August 17). Key news audiences now blend online and traditional sources. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/report/444/news-media
- Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2006, July 30). Online papers modestly boost newspaper readership. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=282
- Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2005). The state of the news media 2005: An annual report on American journalism. Retrieved from http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2005/
- Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2007). The state of the news media 2007: An annual report on American journalism. Retrieved from http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2007/
- Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2010). The state of the news media 2010: An annual report on American journalism. Retrieved from http://www.stateofthemedia.org/2010/
- Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). Naïve realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and understanding. In T. Brown, E. S. Reed, & E. Turiel (Eds.), Values and knowledge. The Jean Piaget Symposium Series (pp. 103–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Stelter, B. (2008, October 20). Fresh face on cable, sharp rise in ratings. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/21/arts/television/21madd.html
- Survey Sampling International. (2007). Global panel book. Fairfield, CT: Author.Google Scholar
- Tvnewser.com (2007, July 3). Q2 2007 program ranker. Retrieved from http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/q2_s_program_ranker_62323.asp