Political Behavior

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 179–202 | Cite as

Sex and Race: Are Black Candidates More Likely to be Disadvantaged by Sex Scandals?

  • Adam J. Berinsky
  • Vincent L. Hutchings
  • Tali Mendelberg
  • Lee Shaker
  • Nicholas A. Valentino
Original Paper

Abstract

A growing body of work suggests that exposure to subtle racial cues prompts white voters to penalize black candidates, and that the effects of these cues may influence outcomes indirectly via perceptions of candidate ideology. We test hypotheses related to these ideas using two experiments based on national samples. In one experiment, we manipulated the race of a candidate (Barack Obama vs. John Edwards) accused of sexual impropriety. We found that while both candidates suffered from the accusation, the scandal led respondents to view Obama as more liberal than Edwards, especially among resentful and engaged whites. Second, overall evaluations of Obama declined more sharply than for Edwards. In the other experiment, we manipulated the explicitness of the scandal, and found that implicit cues were more damaging for Obama than explicit ones.

Keywords

Race Voting behavior Stereotypes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Oleg Bespalov and John Lovett for valuable research assistance and Spencer Piston for helpful comments. Berinsky thanks the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences for research support.

References

  1. Abrajano, M., Nagler, J., & Alvarez, R. M. (2005). A natural experiment of race-based and issue voting: The 2001 city of Los Angeles elections. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 203–218.Google Scholar
  2. Berinsky, A. J. (1999). The two faces of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 43, 1209–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berinsky, A. J., & Mendelberg, T. (2005). The indirect effects of discredited stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 846–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CNN/ORC. (2007). CNN/ORC poll # 2007–012: Economy/Iran/Iraq/2008 presidential election. Storrs: The Roper Center, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Feldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race-conscious programs: Principles or prejudice? American Journal of Political Science, 49, 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gadarian, S. (2008). The politics of threat: Terrorism, media, and foreign policy opinion. Ph.D. Dissertation. Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/33/32/3332408.html.
  10. Giddings, P. (1984). Gender and support for reagan: A comprehensive model of presidential approval. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 19–49.Google Scholar
  11. Gilliam, F. D., & Iyengar, S. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 560–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hajnal, Z. (2001). White residents, black incumbents, and a declining racial divide. American Political Science Review, 95, 603–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Highton, B. (2004). White voters and African American candidates for congress. Political Behavior, 26, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopkins, D. J. (2009). No more wilder effect, never a Whitman effect: When and why polls mislead about black and female candidates. Journal of Politics, 71, 769–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (2005). Playing the race card in the post-Willie Horton era: The impact of racialized code words on support for punitive crime policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hutchings, V. L. (2009). Change or more of the same? Evaluating racial attitudes in the Obama era. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 917–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchings, V. L. & Valentino, N. A. (2003). Driving the wedge: The structure and function of racial group cues in contemporary American politics. Presented at the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  18. Jamieson, K. H. (1992). Dirty politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jeffries, J. L. (2002). Press coverage of black statewide candidates: The case of L. Douglas Wilder of Virginia. Journal of Black Studies, 32, 673–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnston, R., Hagen, M. G., & Jamieson, K. H. (2004). The 2000 presidential election and the foundations of party politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keeter, S. & Samaranayake, N. (2007). Can you trust what polls say about Obama’s electoral prospects. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/408/can-you-trust-what-polls-say-about-obamas-electoral-prospects.
  22. Kinder, D. R. (1983). Diversity and complexity in American public opinion. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline. Washington: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  23. Kinder, D. R., & McConnaughy, C. M. (2006). Military triumph, racial transcendence, and Colin Powell. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ladd, J. M. (2005). Attitudes toward the news media and voting behavior. Presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  26. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Tien, C., & Nadeau, R. (2010). Obama’s missed landslide: A racial cost? PS: Political Science and Politics, 43, 69–76.Google Scholar
  27. McConnaughy, C. M. & White, I. K. (2009). Threatening stereotypes: Race, gender, and election 2008. Paper presented at Princeton Election 2008 Workshop, May 8–9, 2009.Google Scholar
  28. McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 895–918.Google Scholar
  29. Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Mendelberg, T. (2008a). Racial priming revived. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 109–123.Google Scholar
  31. Mendelberg, T. (2008b). Racial priming: Issues in research design and interpretation. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 135–140.Google Scholar
  32. Obama, B. (2004). Dreams from my father: A story of race and inheritance. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Pew (2007). Clinton pressed in Iowa, but holds solid leads elsewhere. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/report/374/democratic-primary-preview-iowa-new-hampshire-south-carolina.
  34. Reeves, K. (1997). Voting hopes or fears? White voters, black candidates and racial politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2003). The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sears, D. O., & Henry, P. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. Vol. 37, pp. 95–150). San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  37. Sears, D. O., Sidanius, J., & Bobo, L. (2000). Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sigelman, C. K., Sigelman, L., Walkosz, B. J., & Nitz, M. (1995). Black candidates, white voters: Understanding racial bias in political perceptions. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sniderman, P. M., & Tetlock, P. E. (1986). Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stoker, L. (1993). Judging presidential character: The demise of Gary Hart. Political Behavior, 15, 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stout, C. & Kline, R. (2008). Ashamed not to vote for an African-American; ashamed to vote for a woman: An analysis of the Bradley effect from 1982–2006. Paper presented at APSA Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  42. Tarman, C., & Sears, D. O. (2005). The conceptualization and measurement of symbolic racism. The Journal of Politics, 67, 731–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Terkildsen, N. (1993). When white voters evaluate black candidates: The processing implications of candidate skin color, prejudice, and self-monitoring. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 1032–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Terkildsen, N., & Damore, D. (1999). The dynamics of racialized media coverage in congressional elections. The Journal of Politics, 61, 680–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tesler, M. & Sears, D. O. (2009). Barack Obama and the two sides of symbolic racism: Explaining the effects of racial resentment in the primaries and beyond. Paper presented at Princeton Election 2008 Workshop, May 8–9, 2009.Google Scholar
  46. Valentino, N. A. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Valentino, N. A. (2001). Review of the race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. By Tali Mendelberg. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Public Opinion Quarterly 65, 607–610.Google Scholar
  48. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., & White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Virtanen, S. V., & Huddy, L. (1998). Old-fashioned racism and new forms of racial prejudice. The Journal of Politics, 60, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, I. (2007). When race matters and when it doesn’t: Racial group differences in response to racial cues. American Political Science Review, 101, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williams, Representative John Bell (MS). (1956). In Congressional Record 102a, H5691–5694. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam J. Berinsky
    • 1
  • Vincent L. Hutchings
    • 2
  • Tali Mendelberg
    • 3
  • Lee Shaker
    • 3
  • Nicholas A. Valentino
    • 2
  1. 1.MITCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations