Political Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 409–422

An Experiment Testing the Relative Effectiveness of Encouraging Voter Participation by Inducing Feelings of Pride or Shame

  • Alan S. Gerber
  • Donald P. Green
  • Christopher W. Larimer
Original Paper


Prior experimental research has demonstrated that voter turnout rises substantially when people receive mailings that indicate whether they voted in previous elections. This effect suggests that voters are sensitive to whether their compliance with the norm of voting is being monitored. The present study extends this line of research by investigating whether disclosure of past participation has a stronger effect on turnout when it calls attention to a past abstention or a past vote. A sample of 369,211 registered voters who voted in just one of two recent elections were randomly assigned to receive no mail, mail that encouraged them to vote, and mail that both encouraged them to vote and indicated their turnout in one previous election. The latter type of mailing randomly reported either the election in which they voted or the one in which they abstained. Results suggest that mailings disclosing past voting behavior had strong effects on voter turnout and that these effects were significantly enhanced when it disclosed an abstention in a recent election.


Field experiment Pride Shame Voting 


  1. Ahmed, E., Harris, N., Braithwaite, J., & Braithwaite, V. (2001). Shame management through reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arceneaux, K. (2005). Using cluster randomized field experiments to study voting behavior. The Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 601, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashby, F. G., & O’ Brien, J. (2007). The effects of positive versus negative feedback on information-integration category learning. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 865–878.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bensel, R. F. (2004). The American ballot box in the mid-nineteenth century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buchwald, A. M. (1962). Variations in the apparent effects of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ on subsequent behavior. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buss, A. H., & Buss, E. H. (1956). The effect of verbal reinforcement combinations on conceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 151–192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. deHooge, I. E., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2008). Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 933–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Effron, D. A., Cameron, J. A., & Monin, B. (2009). Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 590–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The effects of canvassing, telephone calls, and direct mail on voter turnout: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 94, 653–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Green, M. N. (2003). The effects of partisan direct mail on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 22, 563–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2008). Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hansen, B. B., & Bowers, J. (2008). Covariate balance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies. Statistical Science, 23, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. A., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review, 86, 653–660.Google Scholar
  19. Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Susan Taylor, M. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, A. (1961). The relative effectiveness of positive and negative verbal reinforcers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 368–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larimer, C. W. (2009). Does election type have an impact on the effectiveness of social pressure appeals to voting? Evidence from a field experiment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the midwest political science association, Chicago, IL, April 2–5, 2009.Google Scholar
  24. Lazarsfeld, P. F., B. Berelson, & H. Gaudet (1968 [1944]). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Margolis, H. (1982). Selfishness, altruism, and rationality: A theory of social choice. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, W. J., & Offenbach, S. I. (1962). Effectiveness of reward and punishment as a function of task complexity. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 55, 532–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murphy, K., & Harris, N. (2007). Shaming, shame, and recidivism. British Journal of Criminology, 47, 900–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nelissen, R. M. A., Dijker, A. J., & De Vries, N. K. (2007). How to turn a hawk into a dove and vice versa: Interactions between emotions and goals in a give-some dilemma game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Podsakoff, P. M., & Farh, J.-L. (1989). Effects of feedback sign and credibility on goal setting and task performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ringold, D. J. (2002). Boomerang effects in response to public health interventions: Some unintended consequences in the alcoholic beverage market. Journal of Consumer Policy, 25, 27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schultz, P. W. (1999). Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 25–36.Google Scholar
  33. Waldersee, R., & Luthans, F. (1994). The impact of positive and corrective feedback on customer service performance. Journal of Organization Behavior, 15, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Whatley, M. A., Matthew Webster, J., Smith, R. H., & Rhodes, A. (1999). The effect of a favor on public and private compliance: How internalized is the norm of reciprocity. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan S. Gerber
    • 1
  • Donald P. Green
    • 1
  • Christopher W. Larimer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Northern IowaCedar FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations