Political Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 231–253 | Cite as

Taking Threat Seriously: Prejudice, Principle, and Attitudes Toward Racial Policies

  • Christina Suthammanont
  • David A. M. Peterson
  • Chris T. Owens
  • Jan E. Leighley
Original Paper

Abstract

Drawing from group theories of race-related attitudes and electoral politics, we develop and test how anxiety influences the relative weight of prejudice as a determinant of individuals’ support for racial policies. We hypothesize that prejudice will more strongly influence the racial policy preferences of people who are feeling anxious than it will for people who are not. Using an experimental design we manipulate subjects’ levels of threat and find significant treatment effects, as hypothesized. We find that individuals’ racial policy attitudes are partially conditional on their affective states: individuals who feel anxious report less support for racial policies than those individuals who do not feel anxious, even when this threat is stimulated by non-racial content. More broadly, we conclude that affect is central to a better understanding of individuals’ political attitudes and behaviors.

Keywords

Racial attitudes Anxiety Threat Prejudice Emotion Affirmative action 

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumer, H. H. M., Jr. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3–7.Google Scholar
  4. Bobo, L. (2000). Race and beliefs about affirmative action: Assessing the effects of interests, group threat, ideology and racism. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 137–164). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Branton, R. P., & Jones, B. S. (2005). Reexamining racial attitudes: The conditional relationship between diversity and socioeconomic environment. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy: I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore. American Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 50–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to ‘prejudice’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duckitt, J. (2003). Prejudice and intergroup hostility. In D. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 559–600). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Feldman, S., & Huddy, L. (2005). Racial resentment and white opposition to race-conscious programs: Principles or prejudice? American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 168–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, J. A. (1987a). The neuropsychology of emotion and personality. In S. M. Stahl, S. D. Iversen, & E. C. Goodman (Eds.), Cognitive neurochemistry (pp. 171–190). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gray, J. A. (1987b). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4(3), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray, J. A. (1991). Fear, panic, and anxiety: What’s in a name? Psychological Inquiry, 2(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (1996). The neuropsychology of anxiety: Reprise. In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Perspectives on anxiety, panic and fear (Vol. 43, pp. 61–134). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henry, P. J., & Sears, D. O. (2002). The symbolic racism 2000 scale. Political Psychology, 23(2), 253–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hutchings, V. L., & Valentino, N. A. (2004). The centrality of race in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N., & Neuman, W. R. (1996). Cognitive and affective dimensions of political conceptualization. In A. N. Crigler (Ed.), The psychology of political communication. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kellstedt, P. M. (2003). Mass media and the dynamic of American racial attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kramer, R. M., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Close encounters of the suspicious kind: Outgroup paranoia in hierarchical trust dilemmas. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kuklinski, J. H., Sniderman, P. M., Knight, K., Piazza, T., Tetlock, P. E., Lawrence, G. R., et al. (1997). Racial prejudice and attitudes toward affirmative action. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 402–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ladd, J. M., & Lenz, G. S. (2008). Reassessing the role of anxiety in vote choice. Political Psychology, 29, 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2002). Beyond prejudice: Moving from positive and negative evaluations to differentiated reactions to social groups. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  31. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Wood, S. L. (1995). With Malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Thiess-Morse, E., & Stevens, D. (2005). The emotional foundation of political cognition: The impact of extrinsic anxiety on the formation of political tolerance judgments. Political Psychology, 26(6), 949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  34. Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. G., & Amato, T. (1995). Emotions, issue importance, and political learning. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 558–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neuberg, S. L., & Cottrell, C. A. (2002). Intergroup emotions: A biocultural approach. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  36. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.Google Scholar
  37. Quillian, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60(4), 586–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Redlawsk, D. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. Journal of Politics, 64, 1021–1044.Google Scholar
  39. Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In K. Phyllis & T. Dalmas (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53–84). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sears, D. O., Sidanius, J., & Bobo, L. (2000). Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Small, D. A., & Lerner, J. S. (2008). Emotional policy: Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology, 29(2), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence interval for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  44. Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Moods, cycles and swings (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  46. Tarman, C., & Sears, D. O. (2005). The conceptualization and measurement of symbolic racism. Journal of Politics, 67(3), 731–761.Google Scholar
  47. Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the Internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Suthammanont
    • 1
  • David A. M. Peterson
    • 2
  • Chris T. Owens
    • 3
  • Jan E. Leighley
    • 4
  1. 1.Jersey CityUSA
  2. 2.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Central Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA
  4. 4.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations