Shot by the Messenger: Partisan Cues and Public Opinion Regarding National Security and War
Research has shown that messages of intra-party harmony tend to be ignored by the news media, while internal disputes, especially within the governing party, generally receive prominent coverage. We examine how messages of party conflict and cooperation affect public opinion regarding national security, as well as whether and how the reputations of media outlets matter. We develop a typology of partisan messages in the news, determining their likely effects based on the characteristics of the speaker, listener, news outlet, and message content. We hypothesize that criticism of a Republican president by his fellow partisan elites should be exceptionally damaging (especially on a conservative media outlet), while opposition party praise of the president should be the most helpful (especially on a liberal outlet). We test our hypotheses through an experiment and a national survey on attitudes regarding the Iraq War. The results show that credible communication (i.e., “costly” rhetoric harmful to a party) is more influential than “cheap talk” in moving public opinion. Ironically, news media outlets perceived as ideologically hostile can actually enhance the credibility of certain messages relative to “friendly” news sources.
KeywordsPublic opinion Foreign policy Media effects Media bias Iraq
- Bacon, P., Jr. (2006). Can Lieberman survive Iraq? Time, (June), 25. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1207783,00.html.
- Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (forthcoming). War stories: The causes and consequences of citizen views of War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Beaumont, T. (2005). Iowa’s top statesmen have low U.S. profile. The Des Moines Register, Online Edition, October 10. http://nl.newsbank.com.
- Bowers, C. (2007). Action: Freeze out Fox News. Posted to MyDD.com February 21, 2007 http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/2/21/131213/634.
- Brody, R. (1991). Assessing presidential character. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Canes-Wrone, B. (2006). Who leads whom? Presidents, policy, and the public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- CBS/New York Times. (2006). The Connecticut Democratic primary. Exit poll (8/9/06). http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/CBSNews_polls/ctexitpoll.pdf.
- Cox, G., & McCubbins, M. (1993). Legislative leviathan. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
- Dailykos.com. (2006). Nationalizing ‘The Kiss’ (8/11/06). http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/8/11/1801/33929.
- Edwards, G. C., III. (1983). The public presidency. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- Feaver, P. D., & Gelpi, C. (2004). Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and the use of force. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Graber, D. (1997). Mass media and American politics. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Groeling, T. (2001). When politicians attack: The causes, contours, and consequences of partisan political communication. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
- Groeling, T., & Baum, M. A. (2008). Crossing the water’s edge: Elite rhetoric, media coverage, and the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon. The Journal of Politics, 70(October).Google Scholar
- Hamilton, J. T. (2003). All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Holsti, O. (2004). Public opinion and American foreign policy. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Jacobson, G. C. (2006). A divider, not a uniter. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
- Kuhberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 23–55. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2781.
- Kull, S., & Ramsey, C. (2001). The myth of the reactive public. In P. Everts & P. Isneria (Eds.), Public opinion and the international use of force. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Larson, E. V. (2000). Putting theory to work: Diagnosing public opinion on the US intervention in Bosnia. In M. Nincic & J. Lepgold (Eds.), Being useful: Policy relevance and international relations theory (pp. 174–233). Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- McCormack, M., Whitlock, S., & Noyes, R. (2006). The Iraq war on cable TV. Media Research Center report. http://www.mrc.org/SpecialReports/2006/IraqWarCableTV/report121906_p1.asp.
- Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents and public opinion. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
- National Security Council. (NSC). (1997). A national security strategy for a new century. http://clinton2.nara.gov/WH/EOP/NSC/Strategy.
- National Security Council. (NSC). (2005). National strategy for victory in Iraq. http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/iraq/iraq_strategy_nov2005.html.
- Pew Research Center. (2005). News interest/media update. Washington, DC: Pew (June).Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2006). News interest/believability survey. Washington, DC: Pew (June).Google Scholar
- Popkin, S. (1994). The reasoning voter (2nd ed.). New York: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Project for Excellence in Journalism (PEJ). (2005). 2005 annual report—cable TV content analysis. http://www.journalism.org/node/709.
- Sniderman, P., Brody, R., & Tetlock, P. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sobel, R. (1993). What have we learned about public opinion in U.S. foreign policy. In Richard Sobel (Ed.), Public opinion in U.S. foreign policy: The controversy over contra aid (pp. 269–278). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
- Spence, A. Michael. (1973). Market signaling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Tuchman, G. (1972). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Whitcomb, D. (2007). Democrats cancel Fox News debate. Reuters.com. March 9, 2007. http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN0918742820070310.
- Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar