Political Behavior

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 199–221 | Cite as

Conflict, Fusion, or Coexistence? The Complexity of Contemporary American Conservatism

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper draws on an original survey and on the 2004 NES to explore the complexity of contemporary American conservatism. In both datasets, we find evidence that economic and cultural conservatism stand as distinct strands of conservative attitudes. The original survey also allows us to further explore the role of beliefs about the market in economic conservatism. In the end, we find little support for either liberal hopes of fundamental ideological conflict among conservatives or conservative hopes of ideological fusion. Instead, our data suggests that a particular type of ideological coexistence among economic and cultural conservatives is the norm.

Keywords

Public Opinion Ideology Conservatism 

References

  1. Adams, G. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of an issue evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 718–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett, B. (2006). Imposter: How George W. Bush bankrupted American and betrayed the Reagan legacy. Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Bartels, L. (2006). What’s the matter with what’s the matter with Kansas. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(2), 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolce L., & DeMaio, G. (1998). The anti-christian factor in contemporary politics. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 502–542.Google Scholar
  5. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: David, E. (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent, Apter (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Converse, P. E., & Markus, G. B. (1979). Plus Ça change … The new CPS election study panel. American Political Science Review, 73, 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cross, G. S. (2000). An all-consuming century: Why commercialism won in modern America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dionne, E. J. (2006). The great republican rebranding. The Washington Post, May 6, Page A17.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2007a) On symbolic conservatism in America. Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2007b) Pathways to ideology in American politics: The Operational-Symbolic ‘Paradox’ Revisited. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  12. Frank, T. (2000). One market under God: Extreme capitalism, market Populism, and the end of economy democracy. Doubleday Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frank, T. (2004). What’s the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  14. Gaffaney, T. J. (1999). Citizens of the market: The un-political theory of the new right. Polity, 32 (Winter), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hart, J. (2005). The making of the American conservative mind: National review and its times. Intercollegiate Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  16. Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2005). Moral issues and voter decision making in the 2004 Presidential election. PS: Political Science and Politics, 38(April), 201–210.Google Scholar
  17. Himmelstein, J. (1992). To the right: The transformation of American conservatism. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jacoby, W. G. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 178–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kristol, W. (2005). The weekly standard: A reader: 1995–2005.Google Scholar
  20. Layman, G. (2001). The great divide: Religious and cultural conflict in American party politics. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Layman, G., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Cultural conflict in American politics: Religious traditionalism postmaterialism and US political behavior. Journal of Politics, 59(3), 751–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCloskey, H., & Zaller, J. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Meyer, D. (2004). The anatomy of a myth: How did one exit poll answer become the story of how Bush won? Good question. The Washington Post, December 5, Sec. B, p. 1.Google Scholar
  24. Nagourney, A. (2005). Democrats entangled: So what happened in that election, anyhow? The New York Times, January 2, Sec. 4, p. 3.Google Scholar
  25. Nie, N. H., & Andersen, K. (1974). Mass belief systems revisited: Political change and attitude structure. Journal of Politics, 36, 540–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reich, R. (2002). The future of success: Working and living in the new economy. Vintage Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rudolph, T. J., & Evans, J. (2005). Political trust, ideology and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s discontent: America in search of public policy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sears, D., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R., & Allen, H. M. Jr. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and Presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74, 670–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sirota, D. J. (2004). The democrats’ DaVinci code. The American Prospect Online, December 8.Google Scholar
  31. Stimson, J. A. (2004). Tides of discontent. University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sullivan, J. L., Piereson, J. E., & Marcus, G. E. (1978). Ideological constraint in the mass public: A methodolodical critique and some new findings. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sunstein, C. R. (1999). Free markets and social justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUnion CollegeSchenectadyUSA

Personalised recommendations