Political Behavior

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 349–366 | Cite as

Political Disagreement in Context: The Conditional Effect of Neighborhood Context, Disagreement and Political Talk on Electoral Participation

Original Paper

Abstract

Despite scholarly interest in determining how exposure to disagreeable political ideas influences political participation, existing research supports few firm conclusions. This paper argues that these varied findings stem from an implicit model of contextual influence that fails to account for the indirect effect of aggregate social contexts. A model of contextual influence is outlined which implies that the neighborhood partisan context moderates the effect of political disagreement in social networks on campaign participation. The evidence shows that network disagreement demobilizes people who are the political minority in their neighborhood, but has no influence on people in the majority. When viewed together, these findings indicate that a person’s relationship to the broader political environment sets distinctive network processes in motion.

Keywords

Political participation Neighborhood context Social networks Political disagreement 

References

  1. Barabas, J. (2004). How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 687–702.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, D., & Hansen, S. B. (2005). All things considered: Systematic cognitive processing and electoral decision-making. Journal of Politics, 67(2), 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baybeck, B. (2006). Sorting out the competing effects of context. Journal of Politics. http://journalofpolitics.org/files/68_2/Sorting%20Out%20Baybeck.pdf. .Google Scholar
  4. Baybeck, B., & McClurg, S. D. (2005). What do they know and how do they know it? An examination of citizen awareness of context. American Politics Research, 33(4), 492–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Books, J. W., & Prysby, C. L. (1991). Political behavior and the local context. New York: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  7. Branton, R. P., & Jones, B. S. (2005). Reexamining racial attitudes: The conditional relationship between diversity and socioeconomic environment. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, D. E. (2004). Community heterogeneity and participation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL. .Google Scholar
  9. Cho, W. K., Gimpel, J. G., & Dyck, J. G. (2006). Residential concentration, political socialization, and american democracy. Journal of Politics, 68(1), 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cho, W. K., & Rudolph, T. J. (N.d.) Untangling the spatial structure of political participation. Unpublished manuscript. .Google Scholar
  11. Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2003). Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: An economist’s perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1(1), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cox, G. W., & Munger, M. C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures, and turnout in the 1982 house elections. American Political Science Review, 83(1), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finifter, A. (1974). The friendship group as a protective environment for political deviants. American Political Science Review, 68(2), 607–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedrich, R. J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 797–833.Google Scholar
  15. Gimpel, J. G., Lay, J. C., & Schuknecht, J. E. (2003). Cultivating democracy: Civic environments and political socialization in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  16. Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan J. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the spiral of silence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huckfeldt, R. (1983). Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: environmental constraints on friendship choice. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 651–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huckfeldt, R. (1984). Political loyalties and social class ties: The mechanisms of social influence. American Journal of Political Science, 28(2), 399–417.Google Scholar
  19. Huckfeldt, R. (1986). Politics in context: Assimilation and conflict in urban neighborhoods. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Huckfeldt, R. (2001). The social communication of political expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 425–439.Google Scholar
  21. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Huckfeldt, R., Plutzer, E., & Sprague, J. (1993). Alternative contexts of political behavior: Churches, neighborhoods, and individuals. Journal of Politics, 55(2), 365–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1984). Presidential election campaign study, 1984: [South Bend, Indiana] [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Indiana University, Center for Survey Research [producer], 1985. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1995. Google Scholar
  24. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1987). Networks in context: The social flow of political information. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1197–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1988). Choice, social structure, and political information: The information coercion of minorities. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 467–482.Google Scholar
  26. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1992). Political parties and electoral mobilization: political structure, social structure, and the party canvas. American Political Science Review, 86, 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Klofstad, C. A. (n.d.). The art of associating: The causal influence of peers on civic participation. Unpublished paper, University of Miami.Google Scholar
  29. Knoke, D. (1990). Networks of political action: Toward theory construction. Social Forces, 68(4), 1041–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lake, R. L. D., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leighley, J. E. (1990). Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation. American Politics Quarterly, 18(4), 459–475.Google Scholar
  32. MacKuen, M. (1990) Speaking of politics: Individual conversational choice, public opinion, and the prospects for deliberative democracy. In J. Ferejohn, & J. Kuklinski (Eds.), Information and democratic processes. Champaign-Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClurg, S. D. (2003). The role of social networks in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science. http://www.ajps.org/articles/50.3.McClurg.ms32318.Google Scholar
  36. Milgram, S. (1974) Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
  37. Mutz, D. (2002a). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855.Google Scholar
  38. Mutz, D. (2002b). Cross cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126.Google Scholar
  39. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion and our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Oliver, J. E. (2001). Democracy in suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993) Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  43. Ulbig, S. G., & Funk, C. L. (1999). Conflict avoidance and political participation. Political Behavior, 21(3), 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972) Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York, NY: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  45. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wolfinger, R. E., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceSouthern Illinois UniversityCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations