Political Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 183–216 | Cite as

Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation



Political participation researchers have developed several evaluative techniques to assess the representativeness of political participation patterns. Yet, while the Internet has become a mainstream avenue for political participation in the United States, current assessments of online participation insufficiently apply these methods. To incorporate these methods we begin by drawing upon resource theory to inform two-stage ordered-logit models of online and offline political participation. Our results suggest that the factors predicting online participation often differ from the factors that predict offline participation. Even so, we find that those from higher socioeconomic backgrounds tend to disproportionately possess these distinct online determinants. Next, we use a wide spectrum of political opinion questions to determine whether online participators’ opinions reflect or distort those of the general population. Overall, we find that online participation tends to relate moderately with liberal preferences. However, because offline participation relates to political attitudes similarly, the Internet only marginally advantages the political voice of liberals. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results.


political participation Internet public opinion political representation resource theory 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvarez, Michael R., Hall, Thad 2004Point, Click, and VoteBrookingsWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels, Larry 1991.Instrumental and quasi-instrumental variablesAmerican Journal of Political Science35777800Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, Stephen Earl, Resnick, David 1990The implications of nonvoting for democracy in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Political Science34771802Google Scholar
  4. Bimber, Bruce 1999.The Internet and citizen communication with government: does the medium matter?Political Communication16409428Google Scholar
  5. Bimber, Bruce 2000.The study of information technology and civic engagementPolitical Communication17329333Google Scholar
  6. Bimber, Bruce 2003Information and American DemocracyCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady, Henry, Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman 1995Beyond ses: a resource model of political participationAmerican Political Science Review89271294Google Scholar
  8. Bucy, Erik 2000.Social access to the InternetHarvard International Journal of Press and Politics55061Google Scholar
  9. Bucy, Erik, Gregson, Kimberly 2001Media participation: a legitimizing mechanism of mass democracyNew Media and Society3357380Google Scholar
  10. Center for Survey Research & Analysis (2003). Data obtained from the survey center at the University of ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee, Samprit, Hadi, Ali, Price, Bertram 1999Regression Analysis by ExampleWileyNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Conway, M. Margaret 1991Political Participation in the United StatesCQ PressWashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornfield, Michael 2004.New and improvedCampaign & Elections2542Google Scholar
  14. Cornfield, Michael, Lee Rainie, and John Horrigan (2003). Untuned keyboards: online campaigners, citizens, and portals in the 2002 elections. A Pew Internet and American Life ProjectGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahl, Robert 1989Democracy and its CriticsYale University PressNew HavenGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, Richard, Owen, Diana 1998New Media and American PoliticsOxford University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Delli Carpini, Michael 2000.Gen.com: youth, civic engagement, and the new information environmentPolitical Communication17341349Google Scholar
  18. Fox, John 1991Regression DiagnosticsSage PublicationNewbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  19. Gant, Michael, Lyons, William 1993Democratic theory, nonvoting, and public policyAmerican Politics Quarterly21185204Google Scholar
  20. Grubesic, Tony, Murray, Alan 2002Constructing the divide: spatial disparities in broadband accessPapers in Regional Science81197221Google Scholar
  21. Hill, Quaile Kim, Jan E., Leighley 1992The policy consequences of class bias in state electoratesAmerican Journal of Political Science3635165Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, Thomas, Kaye, Barbara 2003A boost or bust for democracy?Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics8934Google Scholar
  23. Keeter, Scott, Miller, Carolyn, Kohut, Andrew, Groves, Robert M., Presser, Stanley 2000Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a large national telephone surveyPublic Opinion Quarterly64125148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiesler, Sara, Zdaniuk, Bozena, Lundmark, Vicki, and Kraut, Robert (2000). Trobules with the Internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction 15: 323–351Google Scholar
  25. Kling, Robert 1999.What is social informatics and why does it matter?D-Lib Magazine5130Google Scholar
  26. Krueger, Brian 2002.Assessing the potential of Internet political participation in the United States: a resource approachAmerican Politics Research30476498Google Scholar
  27. Lau, Richard, Pomper, Gerald 2002Effectiveness of negative campaigning in U.S. Senate electionsAmerican Journal of Political Science464767Google Scholar
  28. Leigh, Andrew, and Atkinson, Robert (2001). Clear thinking on the digital divide. Paper published by The Progressive Policy InstituteGoogle Scholar
  29. Levy, Steven 2004.Dean’s net effect is just the startNewsweek14373Google Scholar
  30. Lijphart, Arend 1997.Unequal participation: democracy’s unresolved dilemmaAmerican Political Science Review91114Google Scholar
  31. Murdock, Graham, Golding, Peter 1989Information poverty and political inequality: citizenship in the age of privatized communicationsJournal of Communication39180193Google Scholar
  32. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2000). Falling through the net: toward digital inclusion. Report published by the U.S. Department of CommerceGoogle Scholar
  33. Norris, Pippa (2002). Political campaigning on the Internet: business as usual? In Kamarck, Elaine and Joseph Nye, Jr. (eds.), Governance.com. Washington, D.C.: BrookingsGoogle Scholar
  34. Norris, Pippa (1999). Who surfs? new technology, old voters and virtual democracy in the 1996 and 1998 US elections. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conferenceGoogle Scholar
  35. Putnam, Robert 2000Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American CommunitySimon & SchusterNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Radcliff, Benjamin 1994.Turnout and the Democratic voteAmerican Politics Quarterly2225976Google Scholar
  37. Sargan, J.D. 1958.The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variablesEconometrica26393415Google Scholar
  38. Shah, Dhavan, Mcleod, Jack, Yoon, So-Hyang 2001Communication, context, and communityCommunication Research28464506Google Scholar
  39. Solop, Frederic (2000). Digital democracy comes of age in Arizona. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association conferenceGoogle Scholar
  40. Tabachnick, Barbara, Fidell, Linda 1996Using Multivariate Statistics3HarperCollinsNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Tichenor, P.J., Donohue, G.A., Olien, C.N. 1965Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledgePublic Opinion Quarterly34159170Google Scholar
  42. Tolbert, Caroline, McNeal, Ramona 2003Unraveling the effects of the Internet on political participation?Political Research Quarterly56175185Google Scholar
  43. Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary (2003). CLARIFY: software for interpreting and presenting statistical resultsGoogle Scholar
  44. Vavreck, Lynn, Spiliotes, Constantine, Fowler, Linda 2002The effects of retail politics in the New Hampshire primaryAmerican Journal of Political Science46595611Google Scholar
  45. Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Brady, Henry E. 1995Voice and EqualityHarvard University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Weber, Lori, Loumakis, Alysha, Bergman, James 2003Who participates and why?: an analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass publicSocial Science Computer Review212642Google Scholar
  47. Wolf, Gary 2004Weapons of mass mobilizationWired12.0918Google Scholar
  48. Wolfinger, Raymond, Rosenstone, Steven 1980Who Votes?Yale University PressNew HavenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public PolicyUniversity of ConnecticutWest Hartford
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston

Personalised recommendations