Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences

Abstract

This article explores individual differences in citizens’ reliance on cues and values in political thinking. It uses experimental evidence to identify which citizens are likely to engage in heuristic processing and which citizens are likely to engage in systematic processing in developing opinions about a novel issue. The evidence suggests that political awareness crisply distinguishes between heuristic and systematic processors. The less politically aware rely on party cues and not on an issue-relevant value. As political awareness increases, reliance on party cues drops and reliance on an issue-relevant value rises. Need for cognition fails to yield clear results. The results suggest two routes to opinion formation: heuristic processing and systematic processing. Political awareness, not need for cognition, predicts which route citizens will take.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Scott L. Althaus (1998) ArticleTitleInformation effects in collective preferences American Political Science Review 92 545–558

  2. John A. Bargh (1999) The cognitive monster: the case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects Chaiken Shelly Trope Yaacov (Eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology Guilford New York 361–382

  3. Larry M. Bartels (1996) ArticleTitleUninformed votes: information effects in presidential elections American Journal of Political Science 40 194–230

  4. Bizer, George Y., Krosnick, Jon A., Petty, Richard E., Rucker, Derek D. and Wheeler, S. Christian (2000). Need for cognition and need to evaluate in the 1998 National Election Survey Pilot Study. Report to the Board of Overseers for the National Election Studies

  5. John T. Cacioppo Richard E. Petty (1982) ArticleTitleThe need for cognition Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42 116–131 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0022-3514.42.1.116

  6. John T. Cacioppo Richard E. Petty Jeffrey A. Feinstein W. B. G. Jarvis (1996) ArticleTitleDispositional differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition Psychological Bulletin 119 197–253 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0033-2909.119.3.488

  7. Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E. ([1960]1980). The American Voter: Unabridged Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  8. Serena Chen Shelly Chaiken (1999) The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context Chaiken Shelly Trope Yaacov (Eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology Guilford New York 73–96

  9. Serena Chen David Shechter Shelly Chaiken (1996) ArticleTitleGetting at the truth or getting along: accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 262–275 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.262

  10. Herbert H. Clark Michael F. Schober (1992) Asking questions and influencing answers Judith M. Tanur (Eds) Questions About Questions: Inquiries into the Cognitive Bases of Surveys Russell Sage Foundation New York 15–48

  11. Pamela Johnston Conover Stanley Feldman (1989) ArticleTitleCandidate perception in an ambiguous world: campaigns, cues, and inference processes American Journal of Political Science 33 912–940

  12. Philip E. Converse (1962) ArticleTitleInformation flow and the stability of partisan attitudes Public Opinion Quarterly 26 578–599 Occurrence Handle10.1086/267129

  13. Converse, Philip E. (1990). Popular representation and the distribution of information. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and Democratic Processes, pp. 369–388. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press

  14. Dewey, John ([1927]1954). The Public and its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press

  15. Dewey, John ([1933]1997). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process, Boston: D.C. Heath and Company

  16. Anthony Downs (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy Harper New York

  17. N. Druckman James (2000) Using credible advice to overcome framing effects Washington, D.C Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association

  18. N. Druckman James Kjersten R. Nelson (2003) ArticleTitleFraming and deliberation: how citizens’ conversations limit elite influence American Journal of Political Science 47 729–745 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1540-5907.00051

  19. Byron Egeland (1974) ArticleTitleTraining impulsive children in the use of more efficient scanning techniques Child Development 45 165–171 Occurrence Handle4820269

  20. Russell H. Fazio (1999) The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes Chaiken Shelly Trope Yaacov (Eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology Guilford New York 97–116

  21. Stanley Feldman (1988) ArticleTitleStructure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values American Journal of Political Science 32 416–440

  22. Stanley Feldman (2003) Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes O. Sears David Huddy Leonie Jervis Robert (Eds) Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology Oxford New York 477–508

  23. Stanley Feldman Pamela J. Conover (1983) ArticleTitleCandidates, issues, and voters: the role of inference in political perception Journal of Politics 45 810–839

  24. Stanley Feldman John R. Zaller (1992) ArticleTitleThe political culture of ambivalence American Journal of Political Science 36 268–307

  25. Martin Gilens (2001) ArticleTitlePolitical ignorance and collective policy preferences American Political Science Review 95 379–396

  26. Roger Giner-Sorolla (1999) Affect in attitude: immediate and deliberative perspectives Chaiken Shelly Trope Yaacov (Eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology Guilford New York 441–461

  27. H.P. Grice (1975) Logic and conversation Cole Peter L. Morgan Jerry (Eds) Syntax and Sematics Academic Press New York 41–58

  28. William G. Jacoby (1988) ArticleTitleThe impact of party identification on issue attitudes American Journal of Political Science 32 643–661

  29. Kam, Cindy D. (2003). Thinking more or less: cognitive effort in the formation of public opinion. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan

  30. Donald R. Kinder (1983) Diversity and complexity in American public opinion W. Finifter Ada (Eds) Political Science: The State of the Discipline American Political Science Association Washington, D.C. 389–425

  31. Donald R. Kinder Lynn M. Sanders (1996) Divided by Color University of Chicago Press Chicago

  32. Jon A. Krosnick (1990) ArticleTitleExpertise and political psychology Social Cognition 8 1–8

  33. Arie W. Kruglanski Donna M. Webster (1996) ArticleTitleMotivated closing of the mind: ‘Seizing’ and ‘freezing’ Psychological Bulletin 103 263–283

  34. James H. Kuklinski Norman L. Hurley (1994) ArticleTitleOn hearing and interpreting political messages: a cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking Journal of Politics 56 729–751

  35. Lippmann, Walter ([1922]1997). Public Opinion. New York: Free Press

  36. Arthur Lupia (1994) ArticleTitleShortcuts versus encyclopedias: information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections American Political Science Review 88 63–76

  37. Arthur Lupia Mathew McCubbins (1998) The Democratic Dilemma Cambridge University Press Cambridge

  38. Cynthia M. Lusk Charles M. Judd (1988) ArticleTitlePolitical expertise and the structural mediators of candidate evaluations Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24 105–126 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0022-1031(88)90016-9

  39. Herbert M. McClosky John Zaller (1984) The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy Harvard University Press Cambridge, M.A.

  40. Kathleen M. McGraw Neil Pinney David Neumann (1991) ArticleTitleMemory for political actors: contrasting the use of semantic and evaluative organizational strategies Political Behavior 13 165–189 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00992295

  41. Mill, John Stuart ([1859]1998). On liberty. In John Gray (ed.), John Stuart Mill: On Liberty and Other Essays, pp. 1–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press

  42. Jeffery J. Mondak (1993a) ArticleTitlePublic opinion and heuristic processing of source cues Political Behavior 15 167–192 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00993852

  43. Jeffery J. Mondak (1993b) ArticleTitleSource cues and policy approval: the cognitive dynamics of public support for the Reagan agenda American Journal of Political Science 37 186–212

  44. Diana C. Mutz (1998) Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes Cambridge University Press Cambridge

  45. David N. Perkins Michael Farady Barbara Bushey (1991) Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence F. Voss James N. Perkins David W. Segal Judith (Eds) Informal Reasoning and Education Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ 83–105

  46. Richard E. Petty John T. Cacioppo (1981) ArticleTitlePersonal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41 847–855 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0022-3514.41.5.847

  47. Richard E. Petty Curtis P. Haugtvedt Stephen M. Smith (1995) Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior E. Petty Richard A. Krosnick Jon (Eds) Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ 93–130

  48. Richard E. Petty Duane T. Wegener (1999) The elaboration likelihood model: current status and controversies Chaiken Shelly Trope Yaacov (Eds) Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology Guilford New York 41–72

  49. Samuel L. Popkin (1994) The Reasoning Voter, Second Edition University of Chicago Chicago

  50. Wendy Rahn (1993) ArticleTitleThe role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates American Journal of Political Science 37 472–496

  51. David O. Sears (1986) ArticleTitleCollege sophomores in the laboratory: influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 515–530 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515

  52. Peverill Squire Eric R. A. N. Smith (1988) ArticleTitleThe effect of partisan information on voters in nonpartisan elections Journal of Politics 50 169–79

  53. Lucy Suchman Brigitte Jordan (1990) ArticleTitleInteractional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews Journal of the American Statistical Association 85 232–241

  54. Seymour Sudman Norman M. Bradburn Norbert Schwarz (1996) Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology Jossey-Bass San Francisco

  55. Taber, Charles and Lodge, Milton (1999). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA

  56. Phillip E. Tetlock (1983) ArticleTitleAccountability and complexity of thought Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 74–83 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0022-3514.45.1.74

  57. Elizabeth Theiss-Morse George E. Marcus John. Sullivan (1993) Passion and reason in political life: the organization of affect and cognition and political tolerance E. Marcus George L. Hanson Russell (Eds) Reconsidering the Democratic Public The Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, PA 249–272

  58. John R. Zaller (1990) ArticleTitlePolitical awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response Social Cognition 8 125–153

  59. R. Zaller John (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion Cambridge University Press Cambridge

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Cindy D. Kam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kam, C.D. Who Toes the Party Line? Cues, Values, and Individual Differences. Polit Behav 27, 163–182 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-1764-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • public opinion
  • political psychology
  • political awareness
  • party cues
  • dual-process models
  • need for cognition.